Accounting for Privacy in Citizen Science: Ethical Research in a Context of Openness

In citizen science, volunteers collect and share data with researchers, other volunteers, and the public at large. Data shared in citizen science includes information on volunteer location or other sensitive personal information; yet, volunteers do not typically express privacy concerns. This study uses the framework of contextual integrity to understand privacy accounting in the context of citizen science, by analyzing contextual variables including roles; information types; data flows and transmission principles; and, uses, norms, and values. Findings show that uses, norms, and values-including core values shared by researchers and public volunteers, and the motivations of individual volunteers' have a significant impact on privacy accounting. Overall, citizen science volunteers and practitioners share and promote openness and data sharing over protecting privacy. Studying the context of citizen science offers an example of contextually-appropriate data sharing that can inform broader questions about research ethics in an age of pervasive data. Based on these findings, this paper offers implications for designing data and information flows and supporting technologies in public and voluntary data sharing projects.

[1]  Lorrie Faith Cranor,et al.  Location-Sharing Technologies: Privacy Risks and Controls , 2009 .

[2]  G. Jasso Factorial Survey Methods for Studying Beliefs and Judgments , 2006 .

[3]  Mark A. Rothstein,et al.  Citizen Science on Your Smartphone: An ELSI Research Agenda , 2015, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[4]  Stuart J. Barnes,et al.  Modeling Use Continuance Behavior in Microblogging Services: The Case of Twitter , 2011, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Anne Bowser,et al.  Civic Education and Citizen Science: Definitions, Categories, Knowledge Representation , 2017 .

[6]  Alice E. Marwick,et al.  Social Privacy in Networked Publics: Teens’ Attitudes, Practices, and Strategies , 2011 .

[7]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Sensr: evaluating a flexible framework for authoring mobile data-collection tools for citizen science , 2013, CSCW.

[8]  Latanya Sweeney,et al.  k-Anonymity: A Model for Protecting Privacy , 2002, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[9]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Goals and Tasks: Two Typologies of Citizen Science Projects , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Steve Harrison,et al.  Co-creating & identity-making in CSCW: revisiting ethics in design research , 2014, CSCW Companion.

[11]  Wayne G. Lutters,et al.  Ethics for Studying Online Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World , 2015, CSCW Companion.

[12]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Privacy in Context - Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life , 2009 .

[13]  Frederic Stutzman,et al.  Boundary regulation in social media , 2012, CSCW.

[14]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science , 2014, CHI.

[15]  M. Edelstein Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development , 1998 .

[16]  Andrea Wiggins,et al.  Community-based Data Validation Practices in Citizen Science , 2016, CSCW.

[17]  Katie Shilton,et al.  Putting mobile application privacy in context: An empirical study of user privacy expectations for mobile devices , 2016, Inf. Soc..

[18]  Carsten S. Østerlund,et al.  Which Way Did They Go?: Newcomer Movement through the Zooniverse , 2016, CSCW.

[19]  Kirsten E. Martin,et al.  Transaction costs, privacy, and trust: The laudable goals and ultimate failure of notice and choice to respect privacy online , 2013, First Monday.

[20]  Rathindra Sarathy,et al.  Understanding Situational Online Information Disclosure as a Privacy Calculus , 2010, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Katie Shilton,et al.  Beyond the Belmont Principles: Ethical Challenges, Practices, and Beliefs in the Online Data Research Community , 2016, CSCW.

[22]  Anil Kumar Understanding Privacy , 2010 .

[23]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Privacy and human behavior in the age of information , 2015, Science.

[24]  Anne Bowser,et al.  Privacy in Participatory Research: Advancing Policy to support Human Computation , 2015, Hum. Comput..

[25]  Katie Shilton,et al.  "We Aren't All Going to Be on the Same Page about Ethics": Ethical Practices and Challenges in Research on Digital and Social Media , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[26]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects , 2012, CSCW.

[27]  Airi Lampinen,et al.  Measuring networked social privacy , 2013, CSCW '13.

[28]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Citizen Science: New Research Challenges for Human–Computer Interaction , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[29]  Candie C. Wilderman,et al.  Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design , 2012 .

[30]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy , 2009 .

[31]  Deirdre K. Mulligan,et al.  It's Not Privacy, and It's Not Fair , 2013 .

[32]  Julie E. Cohen Configuring the Networked Self - Law, Code, and the Play of Everyday Practice , 2012 .

[33]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science , 2014 .

[34]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Using Empirical Data to Reason About Internet Research Ethics , 2005, ECSCW.

[35]  Aleecia M. McDonald,et al.  The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies , 2009 .

[36]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[37]  Madhu C. Reddy,et al.  Privacy practices in collaborative environments: a study of emergency department staff , 2014, CSCW.

[38]  Pamela J. Wisniewski,et al.  Reconciling privacy with social media , 2012, CSCW.

[39]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  “Go Away”: Participant Objections to Being Studied and the Ethics of Chatroom Research , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[40]  Andrea Wiggins,et al.  Free as in puppies: compensating for ict constraints in citizen science , 2013, CSCW.

[41]  Carsten S. Østerlund,et al.  Planet hunters and seafloor explorers: legitimate peripheral participation through practice proxies in online citizen science , 2014, CSCW.

[42]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Five Provocations for Ethical HCI Research , 2016, CHI.

[43]  Kevin C. Elliott,et al.  A framework for addressing ethical issues in citizen science , 2015 .

[44]  J. Reeve,et al.  Solutions to problematic polypharmacy: learning from the expertise of patients. , 2015, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[45]  D. Boyd,et al.  CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA , 2012 .