Characterizing the Nonlinearity of Power System Generator Models

Power system dynamics are naturally nonlinear. The nonlinearity stems from power flows, generator dynamics, and electromagnetic transients. Characterizing the nonlinearity of the dynamical power system model is useful for designing superior estimation and control methods, providing better situational awareness and system stability. In this paper, we consider the synchronous generator model with a phasor measurement unit (PMU) that is installed at the terminal bus of the generator. The corresponding nonlinear process-measurement model is shown to be locally Lipschitz, i.e., the dynamics are limited in how fast they can evolve in an arbitrary compact region of the state-space. We then investigate different methods to compute Lipschitz constants for this model, which is vital for performing dynamic state estimation (DSE) or state-feedback control using Lyapunov theory. In particular, we compare a derived analytical bound with numerical methods based on low discrepancy sampling algorithms. Applications of the computed bounds to dynamic state estimation are showcased. The paper is concluded with numerical tests.

[1]  Shuai Lu,et al.  Estimation of the Dynamic States of Synchronous Machines Using an Extended Particle Filter , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  J. Lofberg,et al.  YALMIP : a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37508).

[3]  Deian Stefan,et al.  Low discrepancy sequences for Monte Carlo simulations on reconfigurable platforms , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Application-Specific Systems, Architectures and Processors.

[4]  R. Rajamani,et al.  Observer design for Lipschitz nonlinear systems using Riccati equations , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[5]  Sara Ahmed,et al.  Optimal resilient defense strategy against false data injection attacks on power system state estimation , 2018, 2018 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT).

[6]  Jitesh H. Panchal,et al.  Risk Mitigation for Dynamic State Estimation Against Cyber Attacks and Unknown Inputs , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[7]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  Comparing Kalman Filters and Observers for Power System Dynamic State Estimation With Model Uncertainty and Malicious Cyber Attacks , 2016, IEEE Access.

[8]  Kai Sun,et al.  Dynamic State Estimation for Multi-Machine Power System by Unscented Kalman Filter With Enhanced Numerical Stability , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[9]  Nikolaos Gatsis,et al.  Robust Control Architectures for Renewable-Integrated Power Networks using Convex Approximations , 2018, ArXiv.

[10]  Knud D. Andersen,et al.  The Mosek Interior Point Optimizer for Linear Programming: An Implementation of the Homogeneous Algorithm , 2000 .

[11]  Vu C. Dinh,et al.  Support Vector Machine Informed Explicit Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Using Low-Discrepancy Sequences , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Joe H. Chow,et al.  Power System Dynamics and Stability: With Synchrophasor Measurement and Power System Toolbox 2e: With Synchrophasor Measurement and Power System Toolbox , 2017 .

[13]  Javad Lavaei,et al.  Multiplier-based Observer Design for Large-Scale Lipschitz Systems , 2018 .

[14]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[15]  Babu Narayanan,et al.  Power system stability and control , 2007 .

[16]  Jian Cheng,et al.  Computational Investigation of Low-Discrepancy Sequences in Simulation Algorithms for Bayesian Networks , 2000, UAI.

[17]  Joe H. Chow,et al.  A toolbox for power system dynamics and control engineering education and research , 1992 .

[18]  I. Kamwa,et al.  Dynamic State Estimation in Power System by Applying the Extended Kalman Filter With Unknown Inputs to Phasor Measurements , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Nikolaos Gatsis,et al.  Robust Control for Renewable-Integrated Power Networks Considering Input Bound Constraints and Worst Case Uncertainty Measure , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[20]  L. Mili,et al.  A Robust Iterated Extended Kalman Filter for Power System Dynamic State Estimation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  D. Siljak,et al.  Robust Decentralized Turbine/Governor Control Using Linear Matrix Inequalities , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[22]  Zhenyu Huang,et al.  Decentralized Robust Control for Damping Inter-area Oscillations in Power Systems , 2017, ArXiv.