Surface Topography, Cobb Angles, and Cosmetic Change in Scoliosis

Study Design Preliminary analysis of the clinical value of surface topography in a spinal deformity clinic. Objectives The Cobb angle is the gold standard for the monitoring of scoliosis. This study was designed to determine whether surface topography would reflect Cobb angle status with sufficient reliability to permit its safe use as an alternative means of documentation in some circumstances. Summary of Background Data Surface topography offers the possibility of describing spinal deformity more fully than radiographic measures alone. To be useful, it must ignore changes due to varying posture and reliably detect differences that are clinically significant, while broadening the ability to assess deformity. Methods Surface topography using Quantec (Quantec Image Processing, Warrington, Cheshire, UK) was obtained routinely in all patients attending a spinal deformity unit. Intrasubject variation was reduced by taking the mean for each parameter of four repositioned scans, which gives a smallest detectable change on all measures of approximately 10 U. Fifty-nine patients with two sets of radiographs and topography scans were studied to determine the ability of the different measurements to detect significant change. Results There was a significant correlation between Cobb angle and Quantec spinal angle. A significant change in Cobb angle could be identified by associated change in at least one topographic measure in a significant proportion of cases. Conclusions It is unlikely that topography will supplant radiography for the ascertainment of Cobb angles, because the error margins of both are wide, and the two are not measuring the same aspect of the deformity. The Quantec system is useful in patient monitoring as an alternative to radiography, without diminishing the standard of care.

[1]  I. Stokes Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. , 1994, Spine.

[2]  D. Bradford Adult scoliosis. Current concepts of treatment. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  A R Turner-Smith,et al.  A television/computer three-dimensional surface shape measurement system. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  C. Merritt,et al.  Low‐Dose Radiography of Scoliosis in Children: A Comparison of Methods , 1994, Spine.

[5]  J. Birch,et al.  Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  R. Fitch,et al.  An Assessment of the Reliability of the Scoliometer , 1993, Spine.

[7]  J. Daruwalla,et al.  Moiré topography in scoliosis. Its accuracy in detecting the site and size of the curve. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  R. Gillespie,et al.  The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurement, analysis and response to treatment. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  E. Hall,et al.  Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  M. El-Sayyad Comparison of roentgenography and moiré topography for quantifying spinal curvature. , 1986, Physical therapy.

[11]  T. Ono [Trunk deformity in scoliosis studied by surface measurement]. , 1995, Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai zasshi.

[12]  W. P. Bunnell,et al.  The Natural History of Idiopathic Scoliosis Before Skeletal Maturity , 1986, Spine.

[13]  H Labelle,et al.  Diurnal Variation of Cobb Angle Measurement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1993, Spine.

[14]  C E Beekman,et al.  Variability of scoliosis measurement from spinal roentgenograms. , 1979, Physical therapy.

[15]  R J Jefferson,et al.  An analysis of normal back shape measured by ISIS scanning. , 1991, Spine.

[16]  E. C. Gregg,et al.  Risks of exposure to X-rays in patients undergoing long-term treatment for scoliosis. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  E. Fogarty,et al.  School Scoliosis Screening and the United States Preventive Services Task Force: An Examination of Long‐Term Results , 1995, Spine.

[18]  R J Jefferson,et al.  Quantifying the cosmetic defect of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1993, Spine.

[19]  M G Ehrlich,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in the evaluation of scoliosis: an application of digital radiography. , 1986, Radiology.

[20]  G. Harris,et al.  Variability in three-dimensional measurements of back contour with raster stereography in normal subjects. , 2000, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[21]  D J Pearsall,et al.  Comparison of three noninvasive methods for measuring scoliosis. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[22]  R J Jefferson,et al.  A method for analysis of back shape in scoliosis. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  G. Andersson,et al.  Postural and time-dependent effects on body height and scoliosis angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1983, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[24]  L. D. De Wilde,et al.  Examination of the back using the Bunnell scoliometer in a Belgian school population around puberty. , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[25]  J. Austin,et al.  Moiré topography in scoliosis. Correlations with vertebral lateral curvature as determined by radiography. , 1986, Physical therapy.

[26]  W. P. Bunnell An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  R. J. Jefferson,et al.  SCOLIOSIS SURGERY AND ITS EFFECT ON BACK SHAPE , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  Mazur Jm,et al.  An evaluation of the Adams forward bend test and the scoliometer in a scoliosis school screening setting. , 1995 .

[29]  R. Cummings,et al.  An evaluation of the Adams forward bend test and the scoliometer in a scoliosis school screening setting. , 1995, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[30]  J. Hanley,et al.  Projecting the lifetime risk of cancer from exposure to diagnostic ionizing radiation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1994, Health physics.

[31]  J. Boice,et al.  Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic x rays. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[32]  Michael Hoke A STUDY OF A CASE OF LATERAL CURVATURE OF THE SPINE: A REPORT ON AN OPERATION FOR THE DEFORMITY , 1903 .

[33]  Y. Wilson,et al.  Standardised trunk asymmetry scores. A study of back contour in healthy school children. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[34]  P. Lee,et al.  Interpretation and Uses of Medical Statistics. , 1969 .

[35]  J. Risser,et al.  The Classic: The Iliac Apophysis: An Invaluable Sign in the Management of Scoliosis , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics.