HIV RNA level in early infection is predicted by viral load in the transmission source

Objective:HIV-1 viral load in early infection predicts the risk of subsequent disease progression but the factors responsible for the differences between individuals in viral load during this period have not been fully identified. We sought to determine the relationship between HIV-1 RNA levels in the source partner and recently infected recipient partners within transmission pairs. Methods:We recruited donor partners of persons who presented with acute or recent (<6 months) HIV infection. Transmission was confirmed by phylogenetic comparison of virus sequence in the donor and recipient partners. We compared viral load in the donor partner and the recipient in the first 6 months of HIV infection. Results:We identified 24 transmission pairs. The median estimated time from infection to evaluation in acutely/recently infected recipient individuals was 72 days. The viral load in the donor was closely associated with viral load at presentation in the recipient case (r = 0.55, P = 0.006). Conclusion:The strong correlation between HIV-1 RNA levels within HIV transmission pairs indicates that virus characteristics are an important determinant of viral load in early HIV infection.

[1]  T. Merigan,et al.  Alternating and Intermittent Regimens of Zidovudine and Dideoxycytidine in Patients with AIDS or AIDS-Related Complex , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  M. Carrington,et al.  Association of HLA profiles with early plasma viral load, CD4+ cell count and rate of progression to AIDS following acute HIV‐1 infection , 1998, AIDS.

[3]  J. Mellors,et al.  Quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in Plasma Predicts Outcome after Seroconversion , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  J. Baeten,et al.  Higher set point plasma viral load and more-severe acute HIV type 1 (HIV-1) illness predict mortality among high-risk HIV-1-infected African women. , 2006, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[5]  F. Hecht,et al.  The Relation Between Symptoms, Viral Load, and Viral Load Set Point in Primary HIV Infection , 2007, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[6]  T. Wrin,et al.  Relationship between In Vitro Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Replication Rate and Virus Load in Plasma , 2003, Journal of Virology.

[7]  J. Baeten,et al.  Virus load during primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) type 1 infection is related to the severity of acute HIV illness in Kenyan women. , 2002, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[8]  Michael P Busch,et al.  Use of laboratory tests and clinical symptoms for identification of primary HIV infection , 2002, AIDS.

[9]  G A Satten,et al.  New testing strategy to detect early HIV-1 infection for use in incidence estimates and for clinical and prevention purposes. , 1998, JAMA.

[10]  Winston A Hide,et al.  Transmission of HIV-1 CTL Escape Variants Provides HLA-Mismatched Recipients with a Survival Advantage , 2008, PLoS pathogens.

[11]  John Sidney,et al.  Reversion of CTL escape–variant immunodeficiency viruses in vivo , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[12]  B. Walker,et al.  Fitness Cost of Escape Mutations in p24 Gag in Association with Control of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 , 2006, Journal of Virology.

[13]  David Heckerman,et al.  Transmission of HIV-1 Gag immune escape mutations is associated with reduced viral load in linked recipients , 2008, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  Jianming Tang,et al.  HLA allele sharing and HIV type 1 viremia in seroconverting Zambians with known transmitting partners. , 2004, AIDS research and human retroviruses.

[15]  D. B. Anderson,et al.  Emerging cytopathic and antigenic simian immunodeficiency virus variants influence AIDS progression , 1999, Nature Medicine.

[16]  M. Goldman.  New testing strategy to detect early HIV-1 infection for use in incidence estimates and for clinical and prevention purposes , 1999 .