Evaluating Intermediate Spanish Students' Speaking Skills through a Taped Test: A Pilot Study.

A pilot study used the Spanish Oral Proficiency Test (SOPT)-a taped oral test to evaluate oral proficiency level of students of Intermediate Spanish. Based on the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines (1986), the Intermediate-Mid was the appropriate level of oral proficiency for students at the end of two years of college-level language study. The study also examined what variables might affect the development of students' oral skills. The results showed that foreign language learning experience in academic settings or outside of class, such as study abroad and travel abroad, might affect students' overall speaking proficiency. In addition, linguistic inaccuracy from informal training may keep speakers to lower levels of proficiency. Learners should be more aware of the need to speak correctly to maintain a balance between function, content, and accuracy.

[1]  Erwin Tschirner,et al.  Reasonable Expectations: Oral Proficiency Goals for Intermediate-Level Students of German. , 1998 .

[2]  Heidi Byrnes,et al.  Defining and developing proficiency : guidelines, implementations, and concepts , 1987 .

[3]  神保 尚武.  言語運用能力(Communicative Competence) , 1987 .

[4]  Claire J. Kramsch.  From Language Proficiency to Interactional Competence , 1986 .

[5]  G. Halleck.  The Oral Proficiency Interview: Discrete Point Test or a Measure of Communicative Language Ability? , 1992 .

[6]  Erwin Tschirner.  Scope and Sequence: Rethinking Beginning Foreign Language Instruction , 1996 .

[7]  M. Swain,et al.  THEORETICAL BASES OF COMMUNICATIVE APPROACHES TO SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING AND TESTING , 1980 .

[8]  Proficiency Testing and the Schools. , 1991 .

[9]  N. Underhill.  Testing Spoken Language: A Handbook of Oral Testing Techniques , 1987 .

[10]  Guadalupe Valdés,et al.  Teaching spanish to hispanic bilinguals: a look at oral proficiency testing and the proficiency movement , 1989 .

[11]  Tina Raffaldini,et al.  The Use of Situation Tests as Measures of Communicative Ability , 1988, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[12]  Dorry M. Kenyon,et al.  Research on the comparability of the oral proficiency interview and the simulated oral proficiency interview , 1992 .

[13]  Irene Thompson,et al.  Assessing Foreign Language Skills: Data from Russian , 1996 .

[14]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  Assessing Language Ability in the Classroom , 1994 .

[15]  E. Shohamy.  A Proposed Framework for Testing the Oral Language of Second/Foreign Language Learners , 1988, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[16]  アラン E. ジャクソン.  Testing the Spoken Language , 1986 .

[17]  Sally Sieloff Magnan.  Grammar and the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview: Discussion and Data , 1988 .

[18]  Susan McMillen Villar,et al.  Proficiency Requirement-Based and Nonproficiency Requirement-Based Second Language Programs; How Do Students Rate?. , 1993 .

[19]  Sally Sieloff Magnan.  Assessing Speaking Proficiency in the Undergraduate Curriculum: Data from French , 1986 .

[20]  Carol A Klee,et al.  Reconsidering the FL requirement: From seat-time to proficiency in the Minnesota experience , 1991 .

[21]  Aleidine J. Moeller,et al.  A Second Look at Grading and Classroom Performance: Report of a Research Study , 1993 .

[22]  B. Vanpatten.  The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines: Implications for Grammatical Accuracy in the Classroom? , 1986, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[23]  David V. Hiple,et al.  ACTFL Provisional Proficiency Guidelines. , 1982 .

[24]  Peter MacIntyre,et al.  Language anxiety: from theory and research to classroom implications , 1992 .

[25]  Barbara F. Freed.  Preliminary Impressions of the Effects of a Proficiency-Based Language Requirement1 , 1987 .

[26]  Gene B. Halleck,et al.  Assessing Oral Proficiency: A Comparison of Holistic and Objective Measures. , 1995 .