Uncertainty Visualization in Medical Volume Rendering Using Probabilistic Animation

Direct volume rendering has proved to be an effective visualization method for medical data sets and has reached wide-spread clinical use. The diagnostic exploration, in essence, corresponds to a tissue classification task, which is often complex and time-consuming. Moreover, a major problem is the lack of information on the uncertainty of the classification, which can have dramatic consequences for the diagnosis. In this paper this problem is addressed by proposing animation methods to convey uncertainty in the rendering. The foundation is a probabilistic Transfer Function model which allows for direct user interaction with the classification. The rendering is animated by sampling the probability domain over time, which results in varying appearance for uncertain regions. A particularly promising application of this technique is a "sensitivity lens" applied to focus regions in the data set. The methods have been evaluated by radiologists in a study simulating the clinical task of stenosis assessment, in which the animation technique is shown to outperform traditional rendering in terms of assessment accuracy.

[1]  Ross T. Whitaker,et al.  Curvature-based transfer functions for direct volume rendering: methods and applications , 2003, IEEE Visualization, 2003. VIS 2003..

[2]  Markus Hadwiger,et al.  Real-time volume graphics , 2006, Eurographics.

[3]  Anders Ynnerman,et al.  Eurographics -ieee Vgtc Symposium on Visualization (2005) Extending and Simplifying Transfer Function Design in Medical Volume Rendering Using Local Histograms , 2022 .

[4]  Charles Hansen,et al.  The Visualization Handbook , 2011 .

[5]  Anders Ynnerman,et al.  Local Histograms for Design of Transfer Functions in Direct Volume Rendering , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  T. Hengl,et al.  Visualisation of uncertainty using the HSI colour model : computations with colours , 2003 .

[7]  Joe Michael Kniss,et al.  Statistically quantitative volume visualization , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[8]  Alex T. Pang,et al.  Approaches to uncertainty visualization , 1996, The Visual Computer.

[9]  Ö. Smedby,et al.  Volume rendering compared with maximum intensity projection for magnetic resonance angiography measurements of the abdominal aorta , 2004, Acta radiologica.

[10]  Alex T. Pang,et al.  Volume Rendering Data with Uncertainty Information , 2001, VisSym.

[11]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Theoretical analysis of uncertainty visualizations , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Nahum D. Gershon,et al.  Visualization of fuzzy data using generalized animation , 1992, Proceedings Visualization '92.

[13]  Penny Rheingans,et al.  Visualization of Molecules with Positional Uncertainty , 1999, VisSym.

[14]  Penny Rheingans,et al.  Point-based probabilistic surfaces to show surface uncertainty , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[15]  Robert S. Laramee,et al.  Uncertainty Visualization Methods in Isosurface Rendering , 2003, Eurographics.

[16]  Chris R. Johnson Top Scientific Visualization Research Problems , 2004, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[17]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Visualizing spatial data uncertainty using animation , 1997 .