Productivity change in the water industry in England and Wales: application of the meta-Malmquist index

This paper uses a meta-Malmquist index for measuring productivity change of the water industry in England and Wales and compares this to the traditional Malmquist index. The meta-Malmquist index computes productivity change with reference to a meta-frontier, it is computationally simpler and it is circular. The analysis covers all 22 UK water companies in existence in 2007, using data over the period 1993–2007. We focus on operating expenditure in line with assessments in this field, which treat operating and capital expenditure as lacking substitutability. We find important improvements in productivity between 1993 and 2005, most of which were due to frontier shifts rather than catch up to the frontier by companies. After 2005, the productivity shows a declining trend. We further use the meta-Malmquist index to compare the productivities of companies at the same and at different points in time. This shows some interesting results relating to the productivity of each company relative to that of other companies over time, and also how the performance of each company relative to itself over 1993–2007 has evolved. The paper is grounded in the broad theory of methods for measuring productivity change, and more specifically on the use of circular Malmquist indices for that purpose. In this context, the contribution of the paper is methodological and applied. From the methodology perspective, the paper demonstrates the use of circular meta-Malmquist indices in a comparative context not only across companies but also within company across time. This type of within-company assessment using Malmquist indices has not been applied extensively and to the authors’ knowledge not to the UK water industry. From the application perspective, the paper throws light on the performance of UK water companies and assesses the potential impact of regulation on their performance. In this context, it updates the relevant literature using more recent data.

[1]  David S. Saal,et al.  Productivity and Price Performance in the Privatized Water and Sewerage Companies of England and Wales , 2001 .

[2]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth during the Deregulation of Norwegian Banking, 1980-89 , 1992 .

[3]  S. Ray,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH, TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND EFFICIENCY CHANGE IN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES: COMMENT , 1997 .

[4]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects☆ , 1995 .

[5]  A. Bottasso,et al.  Cost Inefficiency in the English and Welsh Water Industry: An Heteroskedastic Stochastic Cost Frontier Approach , 2003 .

[6]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Hicks′ Neutrality and Trade Biased Growth: A Taxonomy , 1994 .

[7]  David S. Saal,et al.  Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985–2000 , 2007 .

[8]  David Parker,et al.  The comparative impact of privatisation and regulation on productivity growth in the English and Welsh water and sewerage industry, 1985-99 , 2004 .

[9]  David Parker,et al.  The impact of privatization and regulation on the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: a translog cost function model , 2000 .

[10]  Jesus T. Pastor,et al.  Circularity of the Malmquist productivity index , 2007 .

[11]  Arnaud Reynaud,et al.  The Impact of Regulation on Cost Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis of Wisconsin Water Utilities , 2005 .

[12]  Scott Reid,et al.  Estimating OPEX productivity growth in English and Welsh water and sewerage companies:1992-2003 , 2004 .

[13]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  ON THE CIRCULARITY OF THE MALMQUIST PRODUCTIVITY INDEX , 2002 .

[14]  A. Camanho,et al.  Assessing the evolution of school performance and value-added: trends over four years , 2013 .

[15]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[16]  George E. Battese,et al.  Technology Gap, Efficiency, and a Stochastic Metafrontier Function , 2002 .

[17]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Malmquist Indexes Using a Geometric Distance Function (GDF). Application to a Sample of Portuguese Bank Branches , 2004 .

[18]  J. Pastor,et al.  A global Malmquist productivity index , 2005 .

[19]  Rikard Althin,et al.  Measurement of Productivity Changes: Two Malmquist Index Approaches , 2001 .

[20]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Scale Economies , Technology and Technical Change in the Water Industry : Evidence from the English Water Only Sector , 2007 .

[22]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Malmquist-type indices in the presence of negative data: An application to bank branches , 2010 .

[23]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[24]  Steven Renzetti,et al.  THE PERFORMANCE OF MUNICIPAL WATER UTILITIES: EVIDENCE ON THE ROLE OF OWNERSHIP , 2004, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[25]  G. Battese,et al.  Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios , 2008 .

[26]  Martin Cave,et al.  Regulation and Efficiency Incentives: Evidence from the England and Wales Water and Sewerage Industry , 2007 .

[27]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  A circular Malmquist-type index for measuring productivity , 2008 .