A design methodology based on the principles of system analysis was used to design a noise abatement approach procedure for Louisville International Airport. In a flight demonstration test, this procedure was shown to reduce the noise at seven locations along the flight path by 3.9 to 6.5 dBA and reduce the fuel consumed during approach by 400 to 500 lbs. The noise reduction is significant given that a 3-decibel difference represents a 50% reduction in acoustic energy and is noticeable to the human ear, and the 7% reduction in the size of the 50 DNL contour that would result if all aircraft were to perform the procedure. The fuel saving is also significant given the financial benefit to airlines and the accompanying reduction in gaseous and particulate emissions. While the analysis of aircraft performance data showed how pilot delay, in combination with auto-throttle and flight management system logic, can result in deviations from the desired trajectory, the results confirm that near-term implementation of this advanced noise abatement procedure is possible. The results also provide ample motivation for proposed pilot cueing solutions and low-noise guidance features in flight management systems. ∗ Associate Professor, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 33-408, Cambridge, MA 02139. AIAA Associate Fellow. ξ Research Assistant, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 35-217, Cambridge, MA 02139. AIAA Student Member. φ Research Assistant, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 35-220, Cambridge, MA 02139. § Principal ATC Analyst, ATM Emerging Program, Phantom Works, The Boeing Company, P.O. Box 3707, MC 7X-40, Seattle, WA 98124. # Senior Engineer, Acoustics Technology, Phantom Works, The Boeing Company, 5301 Bolsa Avenue, MC H013-B308, Huntington Beach, CA 92647-2099. η Engineer/Scientist, ATM Emerging Program, Phantom Works, The Boeing Company, P.O. Box 3707, MC 7X-40, Seattle, WA 98124. AIAA Senior Member. κ Principal Engineer, Acoustics Technology, Phantom Works, The Boeing Company, 5301 Bolsa Avenue, MC H013-B308, Huntington Beach, CA 92647-2099. AIAA Member.
[1]
Nhut Tan Ho,et al.
MITIGATING OPERATIONAL AIRCRAFT NOISE IMPACT BY LEVERAGING ON AUTOMATION CAPABILITY
,
2001
.
[2]
David Bond.
THE BOOK ON NOISE REACHES CHAPTER 4
,
2001
.
[3]
Richard O. Lynch,et al.
Introduction to Design and Analysis of Experiments
,
1999,
Technometrics.
[4]
John-Paul Barrington Clarke.
A systems analysis methodology for developing single event noise abatement procedures
,
1997
.
[5]
Anthony W. Warren,et al.
Development of continuous descent approach concepts for noise abatement [ATC]
,
2002,
Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.
[6]
D. G. Denery,et al.
Flight Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Area Navigation for Jet Transport Noise Abatement
,
1973
.
[7]
Ian A. Waitz,et al.
Trailing-Edge Blowing for Reduction of Turbomachinery Fan Noise
,
2000
.
[8]
John-Paul Clarke,et al.
A Study of Noise Abatement Procedures Using Ames B747-400 Flight Simulator
,
2002
.
[9]
Joseph Giesing,et al.
A summary of industry MDO applications and needs
,
1998
.
[10]
L.J.J. Erkelens.
Development of noise abatement procedures in the Netherlands
,
1999
.
[11]
A. Kershaw,et al.
- 1The influence of ATC in approach noise abatement
,
2000
.
[12]
K. C. White D.G. Denery,et al.
Status and Benefits of Instrumented Two-Segment Approaches; August, 1974
,
1975
.