Shaking Table Substructure Testing Based on Three-Variable Control Method with Velocity Positive Feedback

[1]  Colin Anthony Taylor,et al.  The performance of delay compensation in real-time dynamic substructuring , 2017 .

[2]  Bin Wu,et al.  Robust integrated actuator control: experimental verification and real‐time hybrid‐simulation implementation , 2015 .

[3]  Narutoshi Nakata,et al.  Substructure shake table test method using a controlled mass: formulation and numerical simulation , 2012 .

[4]  Feng Jin,et al.  Real-Time Dynamic Hybrid Testing Coupling Finite Element and Shaking Table , 2014 .

[5]  Igor Lanese,et al.  Development of Software and Hardware Architecture for Real-Time Dynamic Hybrid Testing and Application to a Base Isolated Structure , 2012 .

[6]  Selim Günay,et al.  Enhancement of real-time hybrid simulation on a shaking table configuration with implementation of an advanced control method , 2015 .

[7]  Bin Wu,et al.  An improved equivalent force control algorithm for hybrid seismic testing of nonlinear systems , 2018 .

[8]  Okpin Na,et al.  Verification of Optimized Real-time Hybrid Control System for Prediction of Nonlinear Materials Behavior with 3-DOF Dynamic Test , 2020 .

[9]  Lanfang Luo,et al.  Analysis of the Effects of Soil on the Seismic Energy Responses of an Equipment-Structure System via Substructure Shaking Table Testing , 2019, Shock and Vibration.

[10]  Yong Yuan,et al.  Hybrid Simulation of Seismic Responses of a Typical Station with a Reinforced Concrete Column , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[11]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Development of real‐time pseudo dynamic testing , 1992 .

[12]  R. Park,et al.  Seismic Load Tests on Interior and Exterior Beam-Column Joints with Substandard Reinforcing Details , 2000 .

[13]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Real-Time Hybrid Simulation Using Shake Tables and Dynamic Actuators , 2011 .

[14]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real‐time hybrid structural simulation , 2008 .

[15]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Large‐scale real‐time hybrid simulation of a three‐story steel frame building with magneto‐rheological dampers , 2014 .

[16]  Guoshan Xu,et al.  High performance compensation using an adaptive strategy for real-time hybrid simulation , 2019 .

[17]  Young Suk Park,et al.  Experimental study on the rate-dependency of reinforced concrete structures using slow and real-time hybrid simulations , 2017 .

[18]  Li-Qiao Lu,et al.  Real‐time hybrid simulation of the size effect of tuned liquid dampers , 2017 .

[19]  Zhen Wang,et al.  An adaptive delay compensation method based on a discrete system model for real-time hybrid simulation , 2020 .

[20]  Ruiyang Zhang,et al.  Shake table real‐time hybrid simulation techniques for the performance evaluation of buildings with inter‐story isolation , 2017 .

[21]  Søren Nielsen,et al.  Real-time hybrid aeroelastic simulation of wind turbines with various types of full-scale tuned liquid dampers , 2018, Wind Energy.

[22]  Tao Wu,et al.  Experimental study of seismic response reduction effects of particle damper using substructure shake table testing method , 2018, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[23]  Rosario Gigliotti,et al.  Modeling of gravity-designed RC sub-assemblages subjected to lateral loads , 2017 .

[24]  Hongbin Jiang,et al.  Application of the Hybrid Simulation Method for the Full-Scale Precast Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Structure , 2018 .

[25]  Jihong Bi,et al.  Effects of soil on the energy response of equipment–structure systems with different connection types between the equipment and structure , 2020, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings.

[26]  Pouria Bahmani,et al.  Real-time hybrid simulation of a multi-story wood shear wall with first-story experimental substructure incorporating a rate-dependent seismic energy dissipation device , 2014 .

[27]  Richard Christenson,et al.  Large-Scale Experimental Verification of Semiactive Control through Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2008 .

[28]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Laboratory testing of structures under dynamic loads: an introductory review , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  Xiaodong Ji,et al.  A substructure shaking table test for reproduction of earthquake responses of high‐rise buildings , 2009 .

[30]  Kyung-Won Min,et al.  Real-time substructuring technique for the shaking table test of upper substructures , 2007 .

[31]  Guoshan Xu,et al.  Operator‐splitting method for real‐time substructure testing , 2006 .

[32]  Y. Namita,et al.  Real‐time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber , 1999 .

[33]  Zong Woo Geem,et al.  Optimum Design of PID Controlled Active Tuned Mass Damper via Modified Harmony Search , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[34]  Teng Wu,et al.  Real-time aerodynamics hybrid simulation: Wind-induced effects on a reduced-scale building equipped with full-scale dampers , 2019, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.

[35]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  An overview of seismic hybrid testing of engineering structures , 2016 .

[36]  Bin Wu,et al.  Stability of central difference method for dynamic real‐time substructure testing , 2009 .

[37]  Jeong-Hoi Koo,et al.  Feasibility study of an adaptive mount system based on magnetorheological elastomer using real-time hybrid simulation , 2019 .

[38]  Hong Yue,et al.  Performance extension of shaking table‐based real‐time dynamic hybrid testing through full state control via simulation , 2020, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[39]  Xiuyu Gao,et al.  Real time hybrid simulation: from dynamic system, motion control to experimental error , 2013 .

[40]  Sung-Kyung Lee,et al.  Real-time hybrid shaking table testing method for the performance evaluation of a tuned liquid damper controlling seismic response of building structures , 2007 .

[41]  Hadi Malekghasemi,et al.  Implementation and verification of real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) using a shake table for research and education , 2015 .

[42]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Stability analysis of substructure shake table testing using two families of model-based integration algorithms , 2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[43]  Bin Wu,et al.  Performance of an offshore platform with MR dampers subjected to ice and earthquake , 2011 .