Illusory words created by repetition blindness: A technique for probing sublexical representations

When two orthographically similar words are displayed using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), the repeated letters in the second critical word (W2) are not detected, leading to a deficit in reporting this word, a phenomenon known as repetition blindness (RB). The unrepeated letters in W2 do appear to be detected and available to feed activation to words compatible with them (Morris & Harris, 1999). When a fragment was strategically placed in the RSVP stream, as inGROW throw ank, observers reported seeingthank more often than in the control conditionBEAT throw ank. Illusory words were facilitated by repetition blindness only when the recombining letters maintained their position in the words. Illusory word report was insensitive to the phonological similarity of the recombining letters; equal quantities of illusory words were created by sequences likechina CHEAT THR (→ threat) andswung SWEAT THR (→ threat). In addition to being an interesting phenomenon in its own right, the illusory words paradigm may have considerable use as a tool for probing the perceptual units underlying visual word recognition.

[1]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Perceptual repetition blindness effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  J. Grainger Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. , 1990 .

[3]  H. Hoffman,et al.  Automatic processes in word perception: an analysis from illusory conjunctions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  N Kanwisher,et al.  Determinants of repetition blindness. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  M. Potter,et al.  Repetition blindness: levels of processing. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Signal detection analyses of repetition blindness. , 1996 .

[7]  Timothy R. Jordan,et al.  Presenting words without interior letters: Superiority over single letters and influence of postmask boundaries. , 1990 .

[8]  T D Wickens,et al.  Signal detection analyses of repetition blindness. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Repeated events in rapid lists: I. Encoding and representation. , 1995 .

[10]  Philip T Quinlan,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word identification , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Paul W. B. Atkins,et al.  Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .

[12]  M. Mozer Letter migration in word perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  F. Velde Effect of orthographic preactivation on letter migration. , 1992 .

[14]  D. Bavelier Repetition blindness between visually different items: the case of pictures and words , 1994, Cognition.

[15]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[16]  R. Treiman,et al.  How to see a reading unit , 1986 .

[17]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phonological access of the lexicon: evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[19]  Randolph G. Bias,et al.  Word recognition inside out and outside in , 1981 .

[20]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity , 1970 .

[21]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Reverse “repetition blindness” and release from “repetition blindness”: Constructive variations on the “repetition blindness” effect , 1997, Psychological research.

[22]  G. C. Orden A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[23]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Lexical access-via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS) , 1979 .

[24]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Lexical Access via an Orthographic Code? The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) Reconsidered. , 1983 .

[25]  R. Burchfield Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[26]  J. Segui,et al.  Repetition blindness between words : Nature of the orthographic and phonological representations involved BAVELIER , 2022 .

[27]  D J Mewhort,et al.  Repetition deficit in rapid-serial-visual-presentation displays: encoding failure or retrieval failure? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  H Pashler,et al.  Repetition blindness: perception or memory failure? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[30]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Identity and similarity factors in repetition blindness: implications for lexical processing , 1997, Cognition.

[31]  Eleanor J. Gibson,et al.  Perceptual learning and the theory of word perception , 1971 .

[32]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Repeated events in rapid lists: II. Remembering repetitions. , 1995 .

[33]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The role of syllables in perceptual processing , 1973 .

[34]  M. Potter,et al.  Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness , 1992 .

[35]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[36]  N. Kanwisher Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.

[37]  E. Gibson Learning to read , 1965, Science.

[38]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[39]  C. Harris,et al.  Orthographic Repetition Blindness , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[40]  C. Harris,et al.  A sublexical locus for repetition blindness: evidence from illusory words. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming , 1991 .

[42]  R Treiman To what extent do orthographic units in print mirror phonological units in speech? , 1994, Journal of psycholinguistic research.