The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress

Escalating commitment (or escalation) refers to the tendency for decision makers to persist with failing courses of action. The present article first reviews evidence suggesting that escalation is determined, at least in part, by decision makers' unwillingness to admit that their prior allocation of resources to the chosen course of action was in vain (the self-justification explanation). A distinction is drawn in the second part of the article between alternative (to self-justification) explanations of escalating commitment: Some are designed to replace self-justification, whereas others are intended to supplement self-justification, that is, to add explanatory power beyond that which can be accounted for by self-justification. There is little evidence that the replacement theories provide a better explanation than does self-justification; however, theories designed to supplement self-justification are likely to lead to a more complete explanation. The article concludes by describing several research str...

[1]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[2]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[3]  H. Becker.  Notes on the Concept of Commitment , 1960, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[5]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Factors affecting entrapment in waiting situations: The Rosencrantz and Guildenstern effect. , 1975 .

[6]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[7]  H. Weiss.  Subordinate imitation of supervisor behavior: The role of modeling in organizational socialization , 1977 .

[8]  A. Bandura.  Social learning theory , 1977 .

[9]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Commitment to a Policy Decision: A Multi-Theoretical Perspective. , 1978 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[11]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  The Trapped Administrator: Effects of Job Insecurity and Policy Resistance upon Commitment to a Course of Action. , 1979 .

[12]  A. Buss.  Self-consciousness and social anxiety , 1980 .

[13]  A. Teger,et al.  Too Much Invested to Quit , 1980 .

[14]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[15]  Edward J. Conlon,et al.  The moderating effects of strategy, visibility, and involvement on allocation behavior: An extension of Staw's escalation paradigm. , 1980 .

[16]  B. M. Staw.  The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action , 1981 .

[17]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  The commitment and job tenure of new employees: Some evidence of postdecisional justification. , 1981 .

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[19]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Face-Saving and Entrapment , 1981 .

[20]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Factors affecting entrapment in escalating conflicts: The importance of timing☆ , 1982 .

[21]  Rafik I. Beekun,et al.  Performance Evaluation in a Dynamic Context: A Laboratory Study of the Impact of a Prior Commitment to the Ratee , 1982 .

[22]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  The Relevance of Kahneman and Tversky's Concept of Framing to Organizational Behavior , 1984 .

[23]  Joel Brockner,et al.  The role of modeling processes in the “knee deep in the big muddy” phenomenon , 1984 .

[24]  Michael J. Strube,et al.  Time urgency and the Type A behavior pattern: Implications for time investment and psychological entrapment☆ , 1984 .

[25]  Gregory B. Northcraft,et al.  Dollars, Sense, and Sunk Costs: A Life Cycle Model of Resource Allocation Decisions , 1984 .

[26]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[27]  D. Isenberg.  Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[28]  M. Snyder.  Public Appearances, Private Realities: The Psychology of Self-Monitoring , 1986 .

[29]  Glen Whyte,et al.  Escalating Commitment to a Course of Action: A Reinterpretation , 1986 .

[30]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Expo 86: An Escalation Prototype. , 1986 .

[31]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Escalation of Commitment to an Ineffective Course of Action: The Effect of Feedback Having Negative Implications for Self-Identity. , 1986 .

[32]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making , 1986 .

[33]  Edward J. Conlon,et al.  Information requests in the context of escalation. , 1987 .

[34]  J. Brockner,et al.  Reward allocation and self-esteem: The roles of modeling and equity restoration. , 1987 .

[35]  Michael G. Bowen.  The Escalation Phenomenon Reconsidered: Decision Dilemmas or Decision Errors? , 1987 .

[36]  Edward J. Conlon,et al.  Diffusibility of Blame: Effects on Persistence in a Project , 1987 .

[37]  F. Schoorman,et al.  Escalation bias in performance appraisals: An unintended consequence of supervisor participation in hiring decisions. , 1988 .

[38]  H. Thomas,et al.  Attitudes Toward Risk and The Risk–Return Paradox: Prospect Theory Explanations , 1988 .

[39]  M. Strube,et al.  Time urgency and the Type A behavior pattern: Time investment as a function of cue salience , 1989 .

[40]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Commitment in the face of adversity : a value-affirmation approach , 1990 .

[41]  ENTRAPMENT: ARE GROUPS LESS SUSCEPTIBLE? , 1990 .

[42]  H. Garland.  Throwing Good Money After Bad: The Effect of Sunk Costs on the Decision to Escalate Commitment to an Ongoing Project , 1990 .