Information technology, contextual factors and the volatility of firm performance

This study uses previous theory developed in the IT implementation literature and the information processing view of the firm to empirically investigate the impact of IT investments and several contextual variables on the volatility of future earnings. We use InformationWeek 500 data on IT spending from 1992–1997 to find evidence that IT investments increase the volatility of future earnings but that this impact is highly contingent upon three firm level contextual factors — sales growth, unrelated diversification, and size. These factors can lead to conditions in which IT increases or reduces earnings volatility. Taken together, these results may help explain what has recently been termed the “new productivity paradox,” i.e., the apparent under-investment in information technology despite evidence of highly positive returns for doing so, and suggests settings where managers may be under- or over-discounting returns on IT investments.

[1]  Stephan Kudyba,et al.  Information Technology and Corporate Profitability: A Focus on Operating Efficiency , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[2]  C. B. Schoonhoven.  Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[3]  S. Kothari,et al.  Capitalization Versus Expensing: Evidence on the Uncertainty of Future Earnings from Current Investments in Pp&E Versus R&D , 1998 .

[4]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  Investigating the Risk-Return Relationship of Information Technology Investment: Firm-Level Empirical Analysis , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[5]  M. Pettus.  The Resource-Based View as a Developmental Growth Process: Evidence From the Deregulated Trucking Industry , 2001 .

[6]  P. Strassmann.  The business value of computers , 1990 .

[7]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL GROWTH: BIG IS BEAUTIFUL , 1985 .

[8]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information Technology As A Factor Of Production: The Role Of Differences Among Firms , 1995 .

[9]  D. Kynaston,et al.  Financial times , 2024, Nursery World.

[10]  F. Lichtenberg.  The Output Contributions of Computer Equipment and Personnel: A Firm- Level Analysis , 1993 .

[11]  Michel Benaroch,et al.  Managing Information Technology Investment Risk: A Real Options Perspective , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  R. Grant.  Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications , 1991 .

[13]  F. W. McFarlan,et al.  Portfolio approach to information systems , 1989 .

[14]  P. Ghemawat,et al.  Organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency, The , 1993 .

[15]  W. W. Muir,et al.  Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1980 .

[16]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Refining and Extending the Business Model with Information Technology: Dell Computer Corporation , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[17]  Herman Daems,et al.  Strategic Groups, Strategic Moves and Performance , 1994 .

[18]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  The new productivity paradox , 2003, Commun. ACM.

[19]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  The impact of information systems on organizations and markets , 1991, CACM.

[20]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Measuring Gains in Operational Efficiency from Information Technology: A Study of the Positran Deployment at Hardee'S Inc. , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q , 1999 .

[22]  S. Shane.  Hybrid Organizational Arrangements and Their Implications for Firm Growth and Survival: A Study of New Franchisors , 1996 .

[23]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[24]  M. Aldenderfer,et al.  Cluster Analysis. Sage University Paper Series On Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 07-044 , 1984 .

[25]  Bernadette A. Minton,et al.  The Impact of Cash Flow Volatility on Discretionary Investment and the Costs of Debt and Equity Financing , 1999 .

[26]  Chung-ki Min,et al.  The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: a Firm Level Analysis , 1997 .

[27]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[28]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Value Implications of Investments in Information Technology , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Vernon J. Richardson,et al.  Determinants and Consequences of Firm Information Technology Budgets , 2008 .

[30]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[31]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Interaction effects in multiple regression , 1992 .

[32]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Market rewards associated with patterns of increasing earnings , 1999 .

[33]  Sanjeev Dewan,et al.  Firm Characteristics and Investments in Information Technology: Scale and Scope Effects , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Strategy and Structure in the Multiproduct Firm , 1987 .

[35]  Eli Bartov,et al.  The Timing of Asset Sales and Earnings Manipulations , 1993 .

[36]  D. Whetten.  Organizational Growth and Decline Processes , 1987 .

[37]  M. Morton,et al.  The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation , 1993 .

[38]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[39]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[40]  Bernadette A. Minton,et al.  Does Cash Flow Volatility Affect Firm Value? Its Impact on Discretionary Investment and the Costs of Debt and Equity Financing , 1998 .

[41]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Strategic Information Technology Investments: Guidelines for Decision Making , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Mark Shanley,et al.  Exploiting a Cost Advantage and Coping with a Cost Disadvantage , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[43]  Nancy L. Martin,et al.  IS Project Management: Size, Complexity, Practices and the Project Management Office , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[44]  E. Penrose,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[45]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[46]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  K. Ohmae,et al.  Managing in a borderless world. , 1989, Harvard business review.

[49]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Attention Shaping and Software Risk - A Categorical Analysis of Four Classical Risk Management Approaches , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  Jayant R. Kale,et al.  Patterns of Institutional Investment, Prudence, and the Managerial "Safety-Net" Hypothesis , 1989 .

[51]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Information Technology and Firm Boundaries: Evidence from Panel Data , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[52]  S. Kothari,et al.  Capitalization versus Expensing: Evidence on the Uncertainty of Future Earnings from Capital Expenditures versus R&D Outlays , 2002 .