Visual politics is becoming increasingly salient online. The
qualitative methods of the research tradition do not expand to complex media ecologies, but
advances in deep neural networks open an unprecedented path to large-scale analysis on the
basis of actual visual content. However, the analysis of social visuals is challenging,
since social and political scenes are semantically rich and convey complex narratives and
ideas. This paper examines validity conditions for integrating deep neural network tools in
the study of digitally augmented social visuals. It argues that the complexity of social
visuals needs to be reflected in the validation process and its communication: It is
necessary to move beyond the conventionally dichotomous approach to neural network
validation which focuses on data and neural network respectively, to instead acknowledge the
interdependency between data and tool. The final definition of good data is not available
until the end of the process, which itself relies on a tool that needs good data to be
trained. Themes change during the process not just because of our interaction with the data,
but also because of our interactions with the tool and the specific way in which it mediates
our analysis. An upshot is that the conventional approach of performance assessment – i.e.,
counting errors – is potentially misleading in this context. We explore our argument
experimentally in the context of a study that addresses climate communication on YouTube.
Climate themes such as polar bear in arctic landscapes and elite people/events present tough
cases of social visuals.
[1]
Felix M. Simon,et al.
Beyond (Mis)Representation: Visuals in COVID-19 Misinformation
,
2020,
The International Journal of Press/Politics.
[2]
Yilang Peng.
What Makes Politicians’ Instagram Posts Popular? Analyzing Social Media Strategies of Candidates and Office Holders with Computer Vision
,
2020,
The International Journal of Press/Politics.
[3]
T. Venturini,et al.
"We only have 12 years": YouTube and the IPCC report on global warming of 1.5ºC
,
2020,
First Monday.
[4]
Emiliano De Cristofaro,et al.
Characterizing the Use of Images in State-Sponsored Information Warfare Operations by Russian Trolls on Twitter
,
2019,
ICWSM.
[5]
Joachim Allgaier.
Science and Environmental Communication on YouTube: Strategically Distorted Communications in Online Videos on Climate Change and Climate Engineering
,
2019,
Front. Commun..
[6]
Andreu Casas,et al.
Images that Matter: Online Protests and the Mobilizing Role of Pictures
,
2018,
Political Research Quarterly.