Participatory Evaluation of Development Assistance

This article addresses two issues: the theoretical strengthening of the participatory evaluation concept, and the strengths and weaknesses in practice of this approach. It demonstrates how participatory evaluation can be strengthened conceptually and theoretically if based on fourth-generation evaluation and Giddens's structuration theory. Through an analysis of two evaluations in Zambia and Swaziland, strengths and weaknesses of applying the approach in practice are illustrated. The analysis includes elements from Foucault's theory on power, and from theories about decision-making and learning from political and organizational science. It concludes that, using a participatory evaluation approach, interaction and thus learning processes among stakeholders are initiated and facilitated, and that this benefits the ongoing project-implementation process. The characteristic asymmetrical relationship of power between donor and recipient is potentially ameliorated, allowing the less powerful a greater influence on the evaluation and the ensuing implementation process.

[1]  T. Koschmann Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer: Hubert L. Dreyfus and Stuart E. Dreyfus (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1986); 223 pages, £15.00 , 1987 .

[2]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[3]  M. Villarreal The poverty of practice. , 1992 .

[4]  N. Long,et al.  Battlefields of knowledge : the interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development , 1992 .

[5]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[6]  A. Binnendijk Donor Agency Experience With the Monitoring and Evaluation of Development Projects , 1989, Methods for Social Analysis in Developing Countries.

[7]  M. Foucault Orders of discourse , 1971 .

[8]  R. D'amico Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[9]  Peter Oakley,et al.  Approaches to participation in rural development , 1984 .

[10]  M. Lyons,et al.  Community assessment: a tool for motivation and evaluation in primary health care in Sierra Leone. , 1983 .

[11]  Basil E. Cracknell Evaluating development assistance: A review of the literature , 1988 .

[12]  A. Guzmán,et al.  Participatory evaluation: A tool to assess projects and empower people , 1989 .

[13]  E. Lemert Paradigm lost or paradigm regained. , 1979, Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement.

[14]  M. R. Hollnsteiner,et al.  Development by people: Citizen construction of a just world , 1984 .

[15]  P. Bachrach,et al.  Two Faces of Power , 1962, American Political Science Review.

[16]  Deepa Narayan Participatory Evaluation: Tools for Managing Change in Water and Sanitation , 1993 .

[17]  Marie-Thérèse Feuerstein,et al.  Partners in Evaluation: Evaluating Development and Community Programmes with Participants , 1987 .

[18]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[19]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[20]  Anthony Giddens,et al.  Social theory and modern sociology , 1988 .

[21]  The Monitoring and Evaluation of Public Sector Programs in Asia , 1989 .

[22]  John E. S. Lawrence Engaging Recipients in Development Evaluation , 1989 .

[23]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .