Cochlear Electrically Evoked Emissions Modulated by Mechanical Transduction Channels

Cochlear outer hair cells are capable of both mechanical-to-electrical and electrical-to-mechanical transduction. Vibration of their stereocilia by sound is believed to stimulate somatic motility via a receptor potential developed across the basolateral membrane, thereby enhancing the mechanical vibration and increasing the sensitivity and frequency selectivity of the ear. Extrinsic electrical currents, applied at the tops of the cells, also appear to activate motility in vivo, presumably after entering the cell. Earlier experiments suggested such currents might enter through the transduction channels themselves, but an alternative shunt pathway through the membrane capacitance seems more likely on physical grounds. We therefore recorded electrically evoked oto-acoustic emissions while modulating the transduction channels by driving them with low-frequency sound. Recordings of the low-frequency cochlear microphonic provided a measure of the mean electrical conductance through the channels during sound stimulation. Emissions increased during displacement of the basilar membrane toward scala vestibuli, when the channels were biased open, and decreased on the opposite phase, and the modulation of the emission was in direct proportion to the cochlear microphonic. The results are the strongest evidence yet that electrically evoked emissions are generated directly by mechanisms related to cochlear transduction and lead to the surprising conclusion that, for frequencies up to at least 12 kHz, extrinsic electrical currents enter the hair cell predominantly by the resistive pathway through the transduction channels. Alternatively, the results might be consistent with direct modulation of a motility source driven by capacitive currents but whose output depends on the state of the channels.

[1]  G. K. Yates,et al.  4-Aminopyridine in Scala media Reversibly Alters the Cochlear Potentials and Suppresses Electrically Evoked Oto-Acoustic Emissions , 1998, Audiology and Neurotology.

[2]  Otoacoustic emissions, hair cells, and myosin motors. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  G. Geleoc,et al.  A quantitative comparison of mechanoelectrical transduction in vestibular and auditory hair cells of neonatal mice , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  G K Yates,et al.  Frequency tuning and acoustic enhancement of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig cochlea. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A J Hudspeth,et al.  Rapid, Active Hair Bundle Movements in Hair Cells from the Bullfrog’s Sacculus , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Nuttall,et al.  Electromotile hearing: evidence from basilar membrane motion and otoacoustic emissions , 1995, Hearing Research.

[7]  J. Santos-Sacchi,et al.  Membrane tension directly shifts voltage dependence of outer hair cell motility and associated gating charge. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[8]  P Dallos,et al.  High-frequency motility of outer hair cells and the cochlear amplifier. , 1995, Science.

[9]  M. Cheatham,et al.  Stimulus biasing: A comparison between cochlear hair cell and organ of corti response patterns , 1994, Hearing Research.

[10]  D. Mountain,et al.  Effects of electrical biasing on electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions , 1994, Hearing Research.

[11]  Peter G. Gillespie,et al.  Pulling springs to tune transduction: Adaptation by hair cells , 1994, Neuron.

[12]  Shuwan Xue,et al.  Acoustic enhancement of electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions reflects basilar membrane tuning: Experiment results , 1993, Hearing Research.

[13]  P. Dallos,et al.  The location and mechanism of electromotility in guinea pig outer hair cells. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  P. Dallos The active cochlea , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  J. Santos-Sacchi,et al.  On the frequency limit and phase of outer hair cell motility: effects of the membrane filter , 1992, Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Mechanical preprocessing in the mammalian cochlea , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  Y. Hosokawa,et al.  Alternating current induced otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig , 1991, Hearing Research.

[18]  A. J. Hudspeth,et al.  Localization of the hair cell's transduction channels at the hair bundle's top by iontophoretic application of a channel blocker , 1991, Neuron.

[19]  J. Ashmore,et al.  Spectrin, actin and the structure of the cortical lattice in mammalian cochlear outer hair cells. , 1990, Journal of cell science.

[20]  A. E. Hubbard,et al.  Rapid force production in the cochlea , 1989, Hearing Research.

[21]  J. Santos-Sacchi,et al.  Asymmetry in voltage-dependent movements of isolated outer hair cells from the organ of Corti , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  D Robertson,et al.  Tuning in the mammalian cochlea. , 1988, Physiological reviews.

[23]  J. Santos-Sacchi,et al.  Whole cell currents and mechanical responses of isolated outer hair cells , 1988, Hearing Research.

[24]  H. Ohmori,et al.  Mechanical stimulation and Fura‐2 fluorescence in the hair bundle of dissociated hair cells of the chick. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  D. Lim,et al.  Functional structure of the organ of Corti: a review , 1986, Hearing Research.

[26]  D. O. Kim Active and nonlinear cochlear biomechanics and the role of outer-hair-cell subsystem in the mammalian auditory system , 1986, Hearing Research.

[27]  Peter Dallos,et al.  Neurobiology of cochlear inner and outer hair cells: intracellular recordings , 1986, Hearing Research.

[28]  I. J. Russell,et al.  The responses of inner and outer hair cells in the basal turn of the guinea-pig cochlea and in the mouse cochlea grown in vitro , 1986, Hearing Research.

[29]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. II. Responses to low-frequency tones and relationship to microphonics and spike initiation in the VIII nerve. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  The modulation of the sensitivity of the mammalian cochlea by low frequency tones. III. Basilar membrane motion , 1984, Hearing Research.

[31]  Hallowell Davis,et al.  An active process in cochlear mechanics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[32]  Allyn E. Hubbard,et al.  Electromechanical Processes in the Cochlea , 1983 .

[33]  F. A. Bilsen,et al.  Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioural Studies in Hearing , 1980 .

[34]  Duck O. Kim,et al.  An Active Cochlear Model with Negative Damping in the Partition: Comparison with Rhode’s Ante- and Post-Mortem Observations , 1980 .

[35]  T. Konishi,et al.  The temporal relationship between basilar membrane motion and nerve impulse initiation in auditory nerve fibers of guinea pigs. , 1978, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[36]  G. Zweig Basilar membrane motion. , 1976, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[37]  P H Ward,et al.  Longitudinal distribution of the cochlear microphonics inside the cochlear duct (guinea pig). , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Kenneth S. Cole,et al.  PERMEABILITY AND IMPERMEABILITY OF CELL MEMBRANES FOR IONS , 1940 .