Use of the Challenge Point Framework to Guide Motor Learning of Stepping Reactions for Improved Balance Control in People With Stroke: A Case Series

Background and Purpose Stepping reactions are important for walking balance and community-level mobility. Stepping reactions of people with stroke are characterized by slow reaction times, poor coordination of motor responses, and low amplitude of movements, which may contribute to their decreased ability to recover their balance when challenged. An important aspect of rehabilitation of mobility after stroke is optimizing the motor learning associated with retraining effective stepping reactions. The Challenge Point Framework (CPF) is a model that can be used to promote motor learning through manipulation of conditions of practice to modify task difficulty, that is, the interaction of the skill of the learner and the difficulty of the task to be learned. This case series illustrates how the retraining of multidirectional stepping reactions may be informed by the CPF to improve balance function in people with stroke. Case Description Four people (53–68 years of age) with chronic stroke (>1 year) and mild to moderate motor recovery received 4 weeks of multidirectional stepping reaction retraining. Important tenets of motor learning were optimized for each person during retraining in accordance with the CPF. Outcomes Participants demonstrated improved community-level walking balance, as determined with the Community Balance and Mobility Scale. These improvements were evident 1 year later. Aspects of balance-related self-efficacy and movement kinematics also showed improvements during the course of the intervention. Discussion The application of CPF motor learning principles in the retraining of stepping reactions to improve community-level walking balance in people with chronic stroke appears to be promising. The CPF provides a plausible theoretical framework for the progression of functional task training in neurorehabilitation.

[1]  G. Wulf,et al.  Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence? , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[2]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Effects of physical guidance on short-term learning of walking on a narrow beam. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[3]  C. Winstein,et al.  Contextual Interference Effect: Elaborative Processing or Forgetting—Reconstruction? A Post Hoc Analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation—Induced Effects on Motor Learning , 2008, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  Carolee J Winstein,et al.  Impact of explicit information on implicit motor-sequence learning following middle cerebral artery stroke. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[5]  P N T Wells,et al.  Can technology truly reduce healthcare costs? , 2003, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[6]  Brenda Brouwer,et al.  Validity of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale in community-dwelling persons after stroke. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  J. Eng,et al.  Fall-related self-efficacy, not balance and mobility performance, is related to accidental falls in chronic stroke survivors with low bone mineral density , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[8]  Geoff R Fernie,et al.  Change-in-support reactions for balance recovery. , 2003, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[9]  C. Shea,et al.  The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  W. McIlroy,et al.  Training Rapid Stepping Responses in an Individual With Stroke , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[11]  Sung Shin Kim,et al.  Mechanisms of the contextual interference effect in individuals poststroke. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  R M Kohl,et al.  Knowledge of Results for Motor Learning: Relationship Between Error Estimation and Knowledge of Results Frequency , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  R. Masters,et al.  Motor learning of a dynamic balancing task after stroke: implicit implications for stroke rehabilitation. , 2006, Physical therapy.

[14]  C. Winstein,et al.  Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1994, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[15]  R. Hanlon Motor learning following unilateral stroke. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  Carolee J Winstein,et al.  Neural Correlate of the Contextual Interference Effect in Motor Learning: A Kinematic Analysis , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  S. Robinovitch,et al.  The effect of step length on young and elderly women's ability to recover balance. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  M. Guadagnoli,et al.  Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  S. Knorr,et al.  Muscle activation patterns and postural control following stroke. , 2009, Motor control.

[20]  Lara A. Boyd,et al.  Implicit motor-sequence learning in humans following unilateral stroke: the impact of practice and explicit knowledge , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  G Wulf,et al.  Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. , 1999, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[22]  C. Winstein,et al.  Determining the Optimal Challenge Point for Motor Skill Learning in Adults With Moderately Severe Parkinson's Disease , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  D. Filion,et al.  Implicit learning of a motor skill after mild and moderate stroke , 2006, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  T. Ivanova,et al.  Effects of Fast Functional Exercise on Muscle Activity After Stroke , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[25]  W. Miller,et al.  Measurement properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale among individuals with stroke , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[26]  M. Verrier,et al.  The Community Balance and Mobility Scale-a balance measure for individuals with traumatic brain injury , 2006, Clinical rehabilitation.

[27]  C. Shea,et al.  Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.