Interpreting local visual features as a global shape requires awareness

How the brain constructs a coherent representation of the environment from noisy visual input remains poorly understood. Here, we explored whether awareness of the stimulus plays a role in the integration of local features into a representation of global shape. Participants were primed with a shape defined either by position or orientation cues, and performed a shape-discrimination task on a subsequently presented probe shape. Crucially, the probe could either be defined by the same or different cues as the prime, which allowed us to distinguish the effect of priming by local features and global shape. We found a robust priming benefit for visible primes, with response times being faster when the probe and prime were the same shape, regardless of the defining cue. However, rendering the prime invisible uncovered a dissociation: position-defined primes produced behavioural benefit only for probes of the same cue type. Surprisingly, orientation-defined primes afforded an enhancement only for probes of the opposite cue. In further experiments, we showed that the effect of priming was confined to retinotopic coordinates and that there was no priming effect by invisible orientation cues in an orientation-discrimination task. This explains the absence of priming by the same cue in our shape-discrimination task. In summary, our findings show that while in the absence of awareness orientation signals can recruit retinotopic circuits (e.g. intrinsic lateral connections), conscious processing is necessary to interpret local features as global shape.

[1]  R F Hess,et al.  Relationship between facilitation at threshold and suprathreshold contour integration. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  U. Polat,et al.  The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions , 1994, Vision Research.

[3]  B. Julesz,et al.  Perceptual sensitivity maps within globally defined visual shapes , 1994, Nature.

[4]  Hamutal Slovin,et al.  Population response to contextual influences in the primary visual cortex. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  S. Rauch,et al.  Masked Presentations of Emotional Facial Expressions Modulate Amygdala Activity without Explicit Knowledge , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Flank facilitation and contour integration: Different sites , 2006, Vision Research.

[7]  R. Dolan,et al.  A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating "unseen" fear. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  G. Rees,et al.  Fine-scale activity patterns in high-level visual areas encode the category of invisible objects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[9]  M. Carandini,et al.  Stimulus contrast modulates functional connectivity in visual cortex , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  C. Gilbert Horizontal integration and cortical dynamics , 1992, Neuron.

[11]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[13]  James Gordon,et al.  Entrainment to Video Displays in Primary Visual Cortex of Macaque and Humans , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[15]  Huafu Chen,et al.  Neural mechanism of unconscious perception of surprised facial expression , 2010, NeuroImage.

[16]  Donald I A MacLeod,et al.  Imperceptibly rapid contrast modulations processed in cortex: Evidence from psychophysics. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[17]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  Contributions of local orientation and position features to shape integration , 2005, Vision Research.

[18]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Circuits for Local and Global Signal Integration in Primary Visual Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  H. Decker The unconscious. , 1977, Psychological issues.

[20]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  Asaid Khateb,et al.  Discriminating emotional faces without primary visual cortices involves the right amygdala , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Orientation Selectivity and the Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Striate Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  A. Angelucci,et al.  Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate V1 neurons. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[24]  R. Dolan,et al.  Unconscious fear influences emotional awareness of faces and voices. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Learning to Link Visual Contours , 2008, Neuron.

[26]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[27]  K. H. Mild,et al.  Steady-state visual evoked potentials to computer monitor flicker. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[28]  R. Blake,et al.  Suppression During Binocular Rivalry Broadens Orientation Tuning , 2009, Psychological science.

[29]  S Zeki,et al.  The relationship between cortical activation and perception investigated with invisible stimuli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  W. Geisler Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  H. Aarts,et al.  The Unconscious Will: How the Pursuit of Goals Operates Outside of Conscious Awareness , 2010, Science.

[32]  Edward Vul,et al.  Contingent aftereffects distinguish conscious and preconscious color processing , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Kenneth Knoblauch,et al.  Estimating classification images with generalized linear and additive models. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[34]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Reproducibility Distinguishes Conscious from Nonconscious Neural Representations , 2010, Science.

[35]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Contextual Modulation outside of Awareness , 2005, Current Biology.

[36]  G. Rees,et al.  Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  François Mauguière,et al.  Human lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex respond to screen flicker , 2003, Annals of neurology.

[38]  David Fitzpatrick,et al.  Emergent Properties of Layer 2/3 Neurons Reflect the Collinear Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Visual Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Spatial distribution of contextual interactions in primary visual cortex and in visual perception. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.