Parametric Alternatives to the Student T Test under Violation of Normality and Homogeneity of Variance

Introductory statistics textbooks in psychology, education, and social sciences have contributed to the belief that nonparametric tests, such as the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, are effective against violations of both normality and homogeneity of variance. The present paper emphasizes that, although rank methods often are useful when samples are obtained from heavy-tailed, nonnormal distributions, they are influenced by unequal variances just like parametric tests. Computer programs are now available to perform modified t tests based on unequal sample variances, in which degrees of freedom and critical values are altered from sample to sample. These procedures, although neglected for many years because they are computationally complex, are far more effective than nonparametric methods in protecting against violation of homogeneity of variance.

[1]  Welch Bl THE GENERALIZATION OF ‘STUDENT'S’ PROBLEM WHEN SEVERAL DIFFERENT POPULATION VARLANCES ARE INVOLVED , 1947 .

[2]  R. F.,et al.  Mathematical Statistics , 1944, Nature.

[3]  R. Iman,et al.  Rank Transformations as a Bridge between Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics , 1981 .

[4]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[5]  R. Pagano Understanding Statistics in the Behavioral Sciences , 1981 .

[6]  M. E. Muller,et al.  A Note on the Generation of Random Normal Deviates , 1958 .

[7]  John W. Pratt,et al.  Obustness of Some Procedures for the Two-Sample Location Problem , 1964 .

[8]  D. Ruppert Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions , 1987 .

[9]  G. Glass,et al.  Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and Covariance , 1972 .

[10]  B. L. Welch THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO MEANS WHEN THE POPULATION VARIANCES ARE UNEQUAL , 1938 .

[11]  Jean D. Gibbons,et al.  Comparisons of the Mann-Whitney, Student’s t, and Alternate t Tests for Means of Normal Distributions , 1991 .

[12]  P. Hsu Contribution to the theory of "Student's" t-test as applied to the problem of two samples. , 1938 .

[13]  D. C. Howell Statistical methods for psychology, 3rd ed. , 1992 .

[14]  D. W. Zimmerman Comparative Power of Student T Test and Mann-Whitney U Test for Unequal Sample Sizes and Variances , 1987 .

[15]  H. Keselman,et al.  An evaluation of some non-parametric and parametric tests for location equality , 1977 .

[16]  T. Micceri The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. , 1989 .

[17]  F. E. Satterthwaite An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946, Biometrics.

[18]  T. A. Bray,et al.  A Convenient Method for Generating Normal Variables , 1964 .

[19]  Ronald C. Serlin,et al.  QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY Comparison of ANOVA Alternatives Under Variance Heterogeneity and Specific Noncentrality Structures , 1986 .

[20]  J. L. Hodges,et al.  The Efficiency of Some Nonparametric Competitors of the t-Test , 1956 .

[21]  P. A. W. Lewis,et al.  A Pseudo-Random Number Generator for the System/360 , 1969, IBM Syst. J..

[22]  Satterthwaite Fe An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946 .

[23]  J. J. Higgins,et al.  A Comparison of the Power of Wilcoxon's Rank-Sum Statistic to that of Student'st Statistic Under Various Nonnormal Distributions , 1980 .

[24]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Experimental designs, 2nd ed. , 1957 .