CRISPR-Cas9 Editing in Maize: Systematic Evaluation of Off-target Activity and Its Relevance in Crop Improvement

CRISPR-Cas9 enabled genome engineering has great potential for improving agriculture productivity, but the possibility of unintended off-target edits has evoked some concerns. Here we employ a three-step strategy to investigate Cas9 nuclease specificity in a complex plant genome. Our approach pairs computational prediction with genome-wide biochemical off-target detection followed by validation in maize plants. Our results reveal high frequency (up to 90%) on-target editing with no evidence of off-target cleavage activity when guide RNAs were bioinformatically predicted to be specific. Predictable off-target edits were observed but only with a promiscuous guide RNA intentionally designed to validate our approach. Off-target editing can be minimized by designing guide RNAs that are different from other genomic locations by at least three mismatches in combination with at least one mismatch occurring in the PAM proximal region. With well-designed guides, genetic variation from Cas9 off-target cleavage in plants is negligible, and much less than inherent variation.

[1]  Erin L. Doyle,et al.  Targeting DNA Double-Strand Breaks with TAL Effector Nucleases , 2010, Genetics.

[2]  Steven Lin,et al.  Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery , 2014, eLife.

[3]  Erik L. G. Wernersson,et al.  BLISS is a versatile and quantitative method for genome-wide profiling of DNA double-strand breaks , 2017, Nature Communications.

[4]  J. Guzy-Wróbelska,et al.  HorTILLUS—A Rich and Renewable Source of Induced Mutations for Forward/Reverse Genetics and Pre-breeding Programs in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[5]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  In vivo CRISPR editing with no detectable genome-wide off-target mutations , 2018, Nature.

[6]  L Alexander Lyznik,et al.  Heritable targeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease. , 2010, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[7]  David A. Scott,et al.  Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra,et al.  Improved maize reference genome with single-molecule technologies , 2017, Nature.

[9]  Leslie S. Edwards,et al.  Mapping the genomic landscape of CRISPR–Cas9 cleavage , 2017, Nature Methods.

[10]  Daesik Kim,et al.  Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins , 2014, Genome research.

[11]  David R. Liu,et al.  High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Steven L Salzberg,et al.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 , 2012, Nature Methods.

[13]  Jay Shendure,et al.  Single molecule molecular inversion probes for targeted, high-accuracy detection of low-frequency variation , 2013, Genome research.

[14]  Xiaojun Xu,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage efficiency correlates strongly with target-sgRNA folding stability: from physical mechanism to off-target assessment , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Malcolm J Hawkesford,et al.  An integrated approach to crop genetic improvement. , 2012, Journal of integrative plant biology.

[16]  Jing Zhang,et al.  High‐efficiency genome editing using a dmc1 promoter‐controlled CRISPR/Cas9 system in maize , 2018, Plant biotechnology journal.

[17]  M. Albertsen,et al.  Two male-sterile mutants of Zea Mays (Poaceae) with an extra cell division in the anther wall. , 2000, American journal of botany.

[18]  Jong-il Kim,et al.  Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells , 2015, Nature Methods.

[19]  Joshua K Young,et al.  Targeted Mutagenesis, Precise Gene Editing, and Site-Specific Gene Insertion in Maize Using Cas9 and Guide RNA[OPEN] , 2015, Plant Physiology.

[20]  J. Ward,et al.  Bringing New Plant Varieties to Market: Plant Breeding and Selection Practices Advance Beneficial Characteristics while Minimizing Unintended Changes , 2017 .

[21]  S Chandrasegaran,et al.  Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Jay Shendure,et al.  Massively parallel exon capture and library-free resequencing across 16 genomes , 2009, Nature Methods.

[23]  Renata Orłowska,et al.  Quantification of the tissue-culture induced variation in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) , 2007, BMC Plant Biology.

[24]  S. Kaeppler,et al.  Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: breakdown of normal controls. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  S. Tingey,et al.  Artificial chromosome formation in maize (Zea mays L.) , 2009, Chromosoma.

[26]  A. Zanghellini,et al.  A novel engineered meganuclease induces homologous recombination in yeast and mammalian cells. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  High frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  Lin Sun,et al.  High efficient multisites genome editing in allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) using CRISPR/Cas9 system , 2017, Plant biotechnology journal.

[29]  Jan Gorodkin,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9 off-targeting assessment with nucleic acid duplex energy parameters , 2018, Genome Biology.

[30]  C. Chung,et al.  Somaclonal variation does not preclude the use of rice transformants for genetic screening. , 2016, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[31]  Itay Mayrose,et al.  A machine learning approach for predicting CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage efficiencies and patterns underlying its mechanism of action , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  Richard M. Clark,et al.  The Rate and Molecular Spectrum of Spontaneous Mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2010, Science.

[33]  Zhongming Fang,et al.  Blocking amino acid transporter OsAAP3 improves grain yield by promoting outgrowth buds and increasing tiller number in rice , 2018, Plant biotechnology journal.

[34]  P. Schnable,et al.  Extensive intraspecific gene order and gene structural variations between Mo17 and other maize genomes , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[35]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR-Cas9 targeting accuracy , 2017, Nature.

[36]  J. Joung,et al.  CIRCLE-seq: a highly sensitive in vitro screen for genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease off-targets , 2017, Nature Methods.

[37]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Activities and specificities of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cas12a nucleases for targeted mutagenesis in maize , 2018, Plant biotechnology journal.

[38]  Jin-Soo Kim,et al.  Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases , 2014, Bioinform..

[39]  Leping Li,et al.  ART: a next-generation sequencing read simulator , 2012, Bioinform..

[40]  J. Joung,et al.  High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 variants with undetectable genome-wide off-targets , 2015, Nature.

[41]  Dipali G. Sashital,et al.  Achieving Plant CRISPR Targeting that Limits Off‐Target Effects , 2016, The plant genome.

[42]  Zachary H. Lemmon,et al.  Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing , 2018, Nature Plants.

[43]  Bo Zhang,et al.  CasOT: a genome-wide Cas9/gRNA off-target searching tool , 2014, Bioinform..

[44]  R. Barrangou,et al.  Cas9–crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[46]  J. Casacuberta,et al.  Site-directed nucleases: a paradigm shift in predictable, knowledge-based plant breeding. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[47]  Botao Zhang,et al.  Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  GUIDE-Seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[49]  A. Marocco,et al.  The Enhancement of Plant Disease Resistance Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[50]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[51]  B. Larkins,et al.  Stimulation of the cell cycle and maize transformation by disruption of the plant retinoblastoma pathway , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  David A. Scott,et al.  Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity , 2015, Science.

[53]  Konstantin Severinov,et al.  Interference by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA is governed by a seed sequence , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Yannick Jacob,et al.  Increased efficiency of targeted mutagenesis by CRISPR/Cas9 in plants using heat stress , 2018, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[55]  Tautvydas Karvelis,et al.  Rapid characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements , 2015, Genome Biology.

[56]  Tao Zhang,et al.  A large-scale whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals highly specific genome editing by both Cas9 and Cpf1 (Cas12a) nucleases in rice , 2018, Genome Biology.

[57]  Hui Chen,et al.  The initiation, propagation and dynamics of CRISPR-SpyCas9 R-loop complex , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[58]  Rita Batista,et al.  Microarray analyses reveal that plant mutagenesis may induce more transcriptomic changes than transgene insertion , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Peng Wang,et al.  Simultaneous Editing of Two Copies of Gh14-3-3d Confers Enhanced Transgene-Clean Plant Defense Against Verticillium dahliae in Allotetraploid Upland Cotton , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[60]  Justin E. Anderson,et al.  Genomic variation and DNA repair associated with soybean transgenesis: a comparison to cultivars and mutagenized plants , 2016, BMC Biotechnology.

[61]  Aaron R. Quinlan,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS APPLICATIONS NOTE , 2022 .

[62]  Namritha Ravinder,et al.  Rapid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via Cas9 protein transfection. , 2015, Journal of biotechnology.

[63]  K. Lowe,et al.  Male-sterile maize plants produced by targeted mutagenesis of the cytochrome P450-like gene (MS26) using a re-designed I-CreI homing endonuclease. , 2013, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[64]  A. Hoischen,et al.  A molecular inversion probe-based next-generation sequencing panel to detect germline mutations in Chinese early-onset colorectal cancer patients , 2017, Oncotarget.

[65]  Shuifang Zhu,et al.  Skewer: a fast and accurate adapter trimmer for next-generation sequencing paired-end reads , 2014, BMC Bioinformatics.

[66]  Qian Zhu,et al.  Tissue-aware data integration approach for the inference of pathway interactions in metazoan organisms , 2015, Bioinform..

[67]  Jianbing Yan,et al.  Contributions of Zea mays subspecies mexicana haplotypes to modern maize , 2017, Nature Communications.

[68]  Lanie Feigenbutz,et al.  Targeted mutagenesis of a conserved anther‐expressed P450 gene confers male sterility in monocots , 2016, Plant biotechnology journal.

[69]  Yanpeng Wang,et al.  Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[70]  M. Freeling,et al.  The liguleless-1 gene acts tissue specifically in maize leaf development. , 1990, Developmental biology.

[71]  J. Qiu,et al.  Progress and prospects in plant genome editing , 2017, Nature Plants.

[72]  Yunbo Luo,et al.  Lycopene Is Enriched in Tomato Fruit by CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Multiplex Genome Editing , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[73]  Y. Oono,et al.  Physiological status of plant tissue affects the frequency and types of mutations induced by carbon-ion irradiation in Arabidopsis , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[74]  J. Doudna,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9 Structures and Mechanisms. , 2017, Annual review of biophysics.

[75]  Joshua K Young,et al.  Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR–Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes , 2016, Nature Communications.

[76]  C. Armstrong,et al.  Development and availability of germplasm with high Type II culture formation response , 1991 .

[77]  Quan Du,et al.  Profiling single-guide RNA specificity reveals a mismatch sensitive core sequence , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[78]  Jin-Soo Kim,et al.  Cas-Designer: a web-based tool for choice of CRISPR-Cas9 target sites , 2015, Bioinform..

[79]  Alejandro Chavez,et al.  Enhanced Bacterial Immunity and Mammalian Genome Editing via RNA-Polymerase-Mediated Dislodging of Cas9 from Double-Strand DNA Breaks. , 2018, Molecular cell.

[80]  Sabina Sánchez-Hernández,et al.  Biased and Unbiased Methods for the Detection of Off-Target Cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9: An Overview , 2016, International journal of molecular sciences.