Magnetic resonance imaging of superficial cartilage lesions: Role of contrast in lesion detection

Excised patellar cartilage phantoms with artificial surface lesions were imaged in a 2 g/dl albumin solution to determine the effect of cartilage/fluid contrast on detection of early degenerative change. Surface lesions consisted of full‐thickness holes, superficial grooves, and coarse abrasion. Phantoms were imaged with a T1‐weighted fast low‐angle shot (FLASH) and T2*‐weighted dual‐echo in the steady state (DESS) sequence. Although both sequences were able to identify full‐thickness holes, they underestimated the presence of superficial grooves and extent of fibrillation. Despite greater bulk tissue contrast between cartilage and fluid for the FLASH sequence, detection of fibrillation was poorer compared with the DESS images. The results of this study suggest that surface properties of fibrillated cartilage contribute significantly to the insensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting superficial lesions. In contrast to previous papers suggesting that T1‐weighted spoiled gradient‐echo imaging provides the greatest accuracy for lesion detection, our results indicate that, in the presence of joint fluid, T2*‐weighted imaging increases detection of superficial lesions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999;10:178–182. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  S. Futagawa,et al.  Fast spin-echo MR of the articular cartilage in the osteoarthrotic knee , 1998, Acta radiologica.

[2]  D Resnick,et al.  Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. , 1993, Radiology.

[3]  C. Rorabeck,et al.  Damage to type II collagen in aging and osteoarthritis starts at the articular surface, originates around chondrocytes, and extends into the cartilage with progressive degeneration. , 1995, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[4]  J. B. Kneeland,et al.  Quantification of the volume of articular cartilage in the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand: accuracy and precision of three-dimensional MR imaging. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  F Eckstein,et al.  In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  G. Lust,et al.  Origin of cartilage laminae in MRI , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  徐貴淑.  Hyaline cartilage: In vivo and in vitro assessment with magnetization transfer imaging(磁気遷移法を利用した硝子軟骨の検討) , 1997 .

[8]  M. Ochi,et al.  The diagnostic value and limitation of magnetic resonance imaging on chondral lesions in the knee joint. , 1994, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[9]  S. A. Schmidt,et al.  Clinical magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in knees: a comparative prospective study of meniscus anterior cruciate ligament and cartilage lesions. , 1998, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  S. Carmichael,et al.  MR imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: Evaluation of two‐ and three‐dimensional sequences , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  L. Frank,et al.  Evaluation of patellar cartilage in cadavers with a low-field-strength extremity-only magnet: comparison of MR imaging sequences, with macroscopic findings as the standard. , 1998, Radiology.

[12]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High resolution MRI of small joints: impact of spatial resolution on diagnostic performance and SNR. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  J. Gore,et al.  Relative contributions of chemical exchange and other relaxation mechanisms in protein solutions and tissues , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Baker Dg,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance evaluation of synovial fluid and articular tissues. , 1985 .

[15]  V. Chandnani,et al.  Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  M. Reiser,et al.  Assessment of normal patellar cartilage volume and thickness using MRI: an analysis of currently available pulse sequences , 1996, Skeletal Radiology.

[17]  Y. Mori,et al.  A scanning electron microscopic study of the degenerative cartilage in patellar chondropathy. , 1993, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[18]  Bernard F. Morrey.  Orthopaedics: Principles and Their Application, 4th ed (in 2 vols) , 1985 .

[19]  G. Wolf,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance evaluation of synovial fluid and articular tissues. , 1985, The Journal of rheumatology.

[20]  Samuel L. Turek,et al.  Orthopaedics : Principles and Their Application , 1977 .

[21]  D. Disler,et al.  Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  D Resnick,et al.  Knee hyaline cartilage evaluated with MR imaging: a cadaveric study involving multiple imaging sequences and intraarticular injection of gadolinium and saline solution. , 1991, Radiology.

[23]  W. Blackburn,et al.  Arthroscopic evaluation of knee articular cartilage: a comparison with plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1994, The Journal of rheumatology.

[24]  David Thomasson,et al.  Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free‐precession sequence for imaging cartilage , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  R S Balaban,et al.  Analysis of water‐macromolecule proton magnetization transfer in articular cartilage , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  D J Mikulis,et al.  Quantitation of articular cartilage using magnetic resonance imaging and three‐dimensional reconstruction , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[27]  G. Adam,et al.  Experimental hyaline cartilage lesions: Two‐dimensional spin‐echo versus three‐dimensional gradient‐echo MR imaging , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  S. Erickson,et al.  In vitro and in vivo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage: zonal anatomy, imaging pitfalls, and pathologic conditions. , 1997, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[29]  R. Balaban,et al.  Musculoskeletal MR imaging at 4 T and at 1.5 T: comparison of relaxation times and image contrast. , 1995, Radiology.

[30]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio requirements for MR imaging of degenerative cartilage. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Artificially produced cartilage lesions in small joints: detection with optimized MRI-sequences. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[32]  J Romero,et al.  MRI of patellar articular cartilage: Evaluation of an optimized gradient‐echo sequence (3D‐DESS) , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[33]  A. Leblanc,et al.  The origin of biexponential T2 relaxation in muscle water , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  D G Disler,et al.  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  Van,et al.  Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage. , 1997, Radiology.