Using synthetic biology to make cells tomorrow's test tubes.

The main tenet of physical biology is that biological phenomena can be subject to the same quantitative and predictive understanding that physics has afforded in the context of inanimate matter. However, the inherent complexity of many of these biological processes often leads to the derivation of complex theoretical descriptions containing a plethora of unknown parameters. Such complex descriptions pose a conceptual challenge to the establishment of a solid basis for predictive biology. In this article, we present various exciting examples of how synthetic biology can be used to simplify biological systems and distill these phenomena down to their essential features as a means to enable their theoretical description. Here, synthetic biology goes beyond previous efforts to engineer nature and becomes a tool to bend nature to understand it. We discuss various recent and classic experiments featuring applications of this synthetic approach to the elucidation of problems ranging from bacteriophage infection, to transcriptional regulation in bacteria and in developing embryos, to evolution. In all of these examples, synthetic biology provides the opportunity to turn cells into the equivalent of a test tube, where biological phenomena can be reconstituted and our theoretical understanding put to test with the same ease that these same phenomena can be studied in the in vitro setting.

[1]  J. Kahn,et al.  Quantitative methods for measuring DNA flexibility in vitro and in vivo. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[2]  Sriram Kosuri,et al.  Causes and Effects of N-Terminal Codon Bias in Bacterial Genes , 2013, Science.

[3]  N. S. Bayliss A ``Metallic'' Model for the Spectra of Conjugated Polyenes , 1948 .

[4]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Synthetic biology: Engineering Escherichia coli to see light , 2005, Nature.

[5]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Build life to understand it , 2010, Nature.

[6]  S. Basu,et al.  A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation , 2005, Nature.

[7]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Programming gene expression with combinatorial promoters , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[8]  Terence Hwa,et al.  Combinatorial transcriptional control of the lactose operon of Escherichia coli , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  R. Phillips Napoleon Is in Equilibrium. , 2015, Annual review of condensed matter physics.

[10]  John S. Townsend,et al.  A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics , 1992 .

[11]  Dmitri Papatsenko,et al.  A self-organizing system of repressor gradients establishes segmental complexity in Drosophila , 2003, Nature.

[12]  R. Lehmann,et al.  Determination of anteroposterior polarity in Drosophila. , 1987, Science.

[13]  D. Endy Foundations for engineering biology , 2005, Nature.

[14]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  The Influence of Promoter Architectures and Regulatory Motifs on Gene Expression in Escherichia coli , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Promoter architecture dictates cell-to-cell variability in gene expression , 2014, Science.

[16]  B. Wold,et al.  Sequence census methods for functional genomics , 2008, Nature Methods.

[17]  J. Peccoud,et al.  Markovian Modeling of Gene-Product Synthesis , 1995 .

[18]  S. Leibler,et al.  DNA looping and physical constraints on transcription regulation. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  David H Burkhardt,et al.  Quantifying Absolute Protein Synthesis Rates Reveals Principles Underlying Allocation of Cellular Resources , 2014, Cell.

[20]  Mark Thomas Holtzapple,et al.  Foundations of Engineering , 1999 .

[21]  M. Bennett,et al.  A fast, robust, and tunable synthetic gene oscillator , 2008, Nature.

[22]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Quantitative dissection of the simple repression input–output function , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Hanno Steen,et al.  Post‐translational modification: nature's escape from genetic imprisonment and the basis for dynamic information encoding , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[24]  M F Crommie,et al.  Confinement of Electrons to Quantum Corrals on a Metal Surface , 1993, Science.

[25]  J. Posakony,et al.  Posterior stripe expression of hunchback is driven from two promoters by a common enhancer element. , 1995, Development.

[26]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis in Vivo of Translation with Nucleotide Resolution Using Ribosome Profiling , 2009, Science.

[27]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  Repression of lac promoter as a function of distance, phase and quality of an auxiliary lac operator. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  S. Small,et al.  A System of Repressor Gradients Spatially Organizes the Boundaries of Bicoid-Dependent Target Genes , 2012, Cell.

[29]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Cell signaling : principles and mechanisms , 2015 .

[30]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Theoretical and experimental dissection of DNA loop-mediated repression. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[31]  James E. Gentle,et al.  Alarm activation, pattern discovery, and anomaly detection in sensor networks , 2012 .

[32]  Michael B. Elowitz,et al.  Architecture-Dependent Noise Discriminates Functionally Analogous Differentiation Circuits , 2009, Cell.

[33]  N. David Mermin,et al.  Is the Moon There When Nobody Looks? Reality and the Quantum Theory , 1985 .

[34]  Michael D. Lemonick,et al.  Life at the speed of light: From the double helix to the dawn of digital life. , 2013 .

[35]  D. Sprinzak,et al.  From Notch signaling to fine-grained patterning: Modeling meets experiments. , 2011, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[36]  J. Monod,et al.  Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. , 1961, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  Michael R. Seringhaus Operators and Promoters: The Story of Molecular Biology and Its Creators , 2002, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[38]  Julio Collado-Vides,et al.  RegulonDB v8.0: omics data sets, evolutionary conservation, regulatory phrases, cross-validated gold standards and more , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[39]  B. Cohen,et al.  Massively parallel in vivo enhancer assay reveals that highly local features determine the cis-regulatory function of ChIP-seq peaks , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  L. Wolpert Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  Peter Buri,et al.  GENE FREQUENCY IN SMALL POPULATIONS OF MUTANT DROSOPHILA , 1956 .

[42]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Biology and Applications of CRISPR Systems: Harnessing Nature’s Toolbox for Genome Engineering , 2016, Cell.

[43]  J. Weissman,et al.  Nascent transcript sequencing visualizes transcription at nucleotide resolution , 2011, Nature.

[44]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Biological consequences of tightly bent DNA: the other life of a macromolecular celebrity. , 2006, Biopolymers.

[45]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  On schemes of combinatorial transcription logic , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  K. Mullis,et al.  Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: the polymerase chain reaction. , 1986, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[47]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Combinatorial Synthesis of Genetic Networks , 2002, Science.

[48]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  Quality and position of the three lac operators of E. coli define efficiency of repression. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[49]  M. Clegg,et al.  MULTIGENIC RESPONSE TO ETHANOL IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[50]  Ahmad S. Khalil,et al.  Synthetic biology: applications come of age , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[51]  Benno Müller-Hill,et al.  Induction of the lac promoter in the absence of DNA loops and the stoichiometry of induction , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[52]  K. Struhl,et al.  Connecting a promoter-bound protein to TBP bypasses the need for a transcriptional activation domain , 1995, Nature.

[53]  H. J. Beaumont,et al.  Experimental evolution of bet hedging , 2009, Nature.

[54]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner , 1988, Cell.

[55]  Benno Müller-Hill,et al.  Repression oflacPromoter as a Function of Distance, Phase and Quality of an AuxiliarylacOperator , 1996 .

[56]  Jeffrey E. Barrick,et al.  Genomic Analysis of a Key Innovation in an Experimental E. coli Population , 2012, Nature.

[57]  J. Elf,et al.  Direct measurement of transcription factor dissociation excludes a simple operator occupancy model for gene regulation , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[58]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Genes and Signals , 2001 .

[59]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[60]  M Ptashne,et al.  Transcriptional activation by artificial recruitment in yeast is influenced by promoter architecture and downstream sequences. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators , 2000, Nature.

[62]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome , 2011 .

[63]  Z. Yakhini,et al.  Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[64]  I. Herskowitz,et al.  Isolation of ORC6, a component of the yeast origin recognition complex by a one-hybrid system. , 1993, Science.

[65]  Michael M. Desai,et al.  Pervasive Genetic Hitchhiking and Clonal Interference in 40 Evolving Yeast Populations , 2013, Nature.

[66]  Jean Sippy,et al.  Decision Making at a Subcellular Level Determines the Outcome of Bacteriophage Infection , 2010, Cell.

[67]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Cis Interactions between Notch and Delta Generate Mutually Exclusive Signaling States , 2010, Nature.

[68]  Drew Endy,et al.  Amplifying Genetic Logic Gates , 2013, Science.

[69]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  Supplemental Information The Transcription Factor Titration Effect Dictates Level of Gene Expression , 2014 .

[70]  Jeffrey E. Barrick,et al.  Genome dynamics during experimental evolution , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[71]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  The embryo as a laboratory: quantifying transcription in Drosophila. , 2014, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[72]  Friedrich Wöhler,et al.  Ueber künstliche Bildung des Harnstoffs , 1828 .

[73]  S. Fields,et al.  A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions , 1989, Nature.

[74]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Effect of Promoter Architecture on the Cell-to-Cell Variability in Gene Expression , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[75]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Scaling of gene expression with transcription-factor fugacity. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[76]  J. Kahn,et al.  Bacterial repression loops require enhanced DNA flexibility. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[77]  M. Gossen,et al.  Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[78]  J. B. Duffy,et al.  GAL4 system in drosophila: A fly geneticist's swiss army knife , 2002, Genesis.

[79]  E. Siggia,et al.  Analysis of Combinatorial cis-Regulation in Synthetic and Genomic Promoters , 2008, Nature.

[80]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation by the Numbers 2: Applications , 2004, q-bio/0412011.

[81]  Mark Ptashne,et al.  A Genetic Switch, Phage Lambda Revisited , 2004 .

[82]  B. Müller-Hill The lac Operon: A Short History of a Genetic Paradigm , 1996 .

[83]  J. Dekker,et al.  Capturing Chromosome Conformation , 2002, Science.

[84]  F. Sanger,et al.  Sequences, sequences, and sequences. , 1988, Annual review of biochemistry.

[85]  J. Keller The Probability of Heads , 1986 .

[86]  A. Hochschild,et al.  Conversion of the omega subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase into a transcriptional activator or an activation target. , 1998, Genes & development.

[87]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Genetic programs constructed from layered logic gates in single cells , 2012, Nature.

[88]  Ales Vancura,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation , 2012, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[89]  Thomas Gregor,et al.  Dynamic interpretation of maternal inputs by the Drosophila segmentation gene network , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[90]  Hans Kuhn,et al.  A Quantum‐Mechanical Theory of Light Absorption of Organic Dyes and Similar Compounds , 1949 .

[91]  R. Lenski,et al.  Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli , 2008 .

[92]  M. Levine,et al.  Mutually repressive interactions between the gap genes giant and Krüppel define middle body regions of the Drosophila embryo. , 1991, Development.

[93]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Transcriptional activation by recruitment , 1997, Nature.

[94]  Pamela Reinagel,et al.  Contact with a component of the polymerase II holoenzyme suffices for gene activation , 1995, Cell.

[95]  Michael M. Wang,et al.  Molecular cloning of the olfactory neuronal transcription factor Olf-1 by genetic selection in yeast , 1993, Nature.

[96]  Terence Hwa,et al.  Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[97]  Leighton J. Core,et al.  Precise Maps of RNA Polymerase Reveal How Promoters Direct Initiation and Pausing , 2013, Science.