Sensory incongruity: comparing vision to touch, audition and olfaction

[1]  David Sprott,et al.  It's beginning to smell (and sound) a lot like Christmas: the interactive effects of ambient scent and music in a retail setting , 2005 .

[2]  L. Marks,et al.  Cross-Modal Interaction between Vision and Touch: The Role of Synesthetic Correspondence , 2000, Perception.

[3]  Dinesh K. Pai,et al.  Perception of Material from Contact Sounds , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[4]  Louise Blackwell,et al.  Visual cues and their effects on odour assessment , 1995 .

[5]  H. Schifferstein.  The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: a study of self-reports. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[6]  L. Marks.  The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations Among the Modalities , 1978 .

[7]  Geke D.S. Ludden,et al.  Effects of visual-auditory incongruity on product expression and surprise , 2007 .

[8]  P. Hekkert.  Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design , 2006 .

[9]  Laurent Gilles,et al.  Engineering Hedonic Attributes to Generate Perceptions of Luxury:Consumer Perception of an Everyday Sound , 2003 .

[10]  de Gelder.  Sound Enhances Visual Perception: Cross-Modal Effects of Auditory Organization on Vision , 2001 .

[11]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Visual illusion induced by sound. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  B. Jones,et al.  Combining vision and touch in texture perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Charles Spence,et al.  The role of auditory cues in modulating the perceived crispness and staleness of potato chips , 2004 .

[14]  H. Schifferstein,et al.  Capturing product experiences: a split-modality approach. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[15]  Geke D.S. Ludden,et al.  Surprise As a Design Strategy , 2008, Design Issues.