Identifying potential marine pests--a deductive approach applied to Australia.

Introduced marine organisms continue to threaten coastal resources around the world. Many agencies rely on lists of potentially harmful species for risk assessment and to prioritise management responses to an incursion. This study outlines a deductive hazard assessment technique to identify potential marine pests that may arrive via ballast water and/or hull fouling. This technique is then applied in an Australian context to identify potential "next pests" for this region. An extensive literature review identified 851 introduced marine species from around the world. The following selection criteria were then applied to develop a next pest list: (a) the species has been reported in a shipping vector or has a ship-mediated invasion history; (b) the vector still exists; (c) the species is responsible for economic or environmental harm; and, (d) it is exotic to Australia or present in Australia but subject to official control. The selection criteria are transparent and consistent with other international and national biosecurity initiatives. Thirty three of the species identified in the initial literature review satisfied all four selection criteria. These species are described here together with their associated vectors and impacts.

[1]  Marnie L. Campbell,et al.  Marine biological invasions of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria , 1999 .

[2]  Morley Rs.  A model for the assessment of the animal disease risks associated with the importation of animals and animal products. , 1993 .

[3]  M. S. Hoddle,et al.  Population biology of invasive species. , 2001 .

[4]  D. Baltz.  Introduced fishes in marine systems and inland seas , 1991 .

[5]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Impact: Toward a Framework for Understanding the Ecological Effects of Invaders , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[6]  M. Verlaque,et al.  Biological pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: invasive versus introduced macrophytes. , 2002, Marine pollution bulletin.

[7]  R. Lubke,et al.  Assessing the potential for biological invasion - the case of Ammophila arenaria in South Africa. , 2000 .

[8]  P. Hutchings,et al.  A Review of Exotic Marine Organisms Introduced to the Australian Region. II. Invertebrates and Algae , 1990, Asian Fisheries Science.

[9]  E. Grosholz,et al.  Non‐indigenous species as stressors in estuarine and marine communities: Assessing invasion impacts and interactions , 1999 .

[10]  F. Castri,et al.  Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective , 1989 .

[11]  C. Duke,et al.  Ecological Risk Assessment Review , 2001 .

[12]  A. Ricciardi,et al.  Predicting the identity and impact of future biological invaders: a priority for aquatic resource management , 1998 .

[13]  Marjorie J. Wonham,et al.  Invasion of Coastal Marine Communities in North America: Apparent Patterns, Processes, and Biases , 2000 .

[14]  Keith R. Hayes,et al.  Identifying Hazards in Complex Ecological Systems. Part 2: Infection Modes and Effects Analysis for Biological Invasions , 2002, Biological Invasions.

[15]  Michael J. Keough,et al.  Introduced and cryptogenic species in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, Australia , 2004 .

[16]  R. Thresher,et al.  Diversity, Impacts and Options for Managing Invasive Marine Species in Australian Waters , 1999 .

[17]  J. Geller,et al.  Ecological Roulette: The Global Transport of Nonindigenous Marine Organisms , 1993, Science.