Investigation of the Effects of Various Energy and Exergy-Based Figures of Merit on the Optimal Design of a High Performance Aircraft System

This paper shows the advantages of applying exergy-based analysis and optimization methods to the synthesis/design and operation of aircraft systems. In particular, an Advanced Aircraft Fighter (AAF) with three subsystems: a Propulsion Subsystem (PS), an Environmental Control Subsystem (ECS), and an Airframe Subsystem - Aerodynamics (AFS-A) is used to illustrate these advantages. Thermodynamic (both energy and exergy based), aerodynamic, geometric, and physical models of the components comprising the subsystems are developed and their interactions defined. Off-design performance is considered as well and is used in the analysis and optimization of system synthesis/design and operation as the aircraft is flown over an entire mission. An exergy-based parametric study of the PS and its components is first presented in order to show the type of detailed information on internal system losses which an exergy analysis can provide and an energy analysis by its very nature is unable to provide. This is followed by a series of constrained, system synthesis/design optimizations based on five different objective functions, which define energy-based and exergy-based measures of performance. The former involve minimizing the gross takeoff weight or maximizing the thrust efficiency while the latter involve minimizing the rates of exergy destruction plus the rate of exergy fuel loss (with and without AFS-A losses) or maximizing the thermodynamic effectiveness. A first set of optimizations involving four of the objecttives (two energy-based and two exergy-based) are performed with only PS and ECS degrees of freedom. Losses for the AFS-A are not incorporated into the two exergy-based objectives. The results show that as expected all four objectives globally produce the same optimum vehicle. A second set of optimizations is then performed with AFS-A degrees of freedom and again with two energy- and exergy-based objectives. However, this time one of the exergy-based objectives incorporates AFS-A losses directly into the objective. The results are that with this latter objective, a significantly better optimum vehicle is produced. Thus, an exergy-based approach is not only able to pinpoint where the greatest inefficiencies in the system occur but appears at least in this case to produce a superior optimum vehicle as well by accounting for irreversibility losses in subsystems (e.g., the AFS-A) only indirectly tied to fuel usage.Copyright © 2006 by ASME

[1]  Von Spakovsky.  A Second Law Based Integrated Thermoeconomic Modeling and Optimization Strategy for Aircraft/Aerospace Energy System Synthesis and Design , 2001 .

[2]  David Moorhouse.  The vision and need for energy-based design methods , 2000 .

[3]  Daniel Favrat,et al.  The Thermoeconomic and Environomic Modeling and Optimization of the Synthesis, Design, and Operation of Combined Cycles With Advanced Options , 2001 .

[4]  Daniel Favrat,et al.  An Approach for the Time–Dependent Thermoeconomic Modeling and Optimization of Energy System Synthesis, Design and Operation. , 1997 .

[5]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Method for Propulsion Technology Impact Evaluation via Thermodynamic Work Potential , 2003 .

[6]  Bryce Roth.  A work potential perspective of engine component performance , 2001 .

[7]  Richard Figliola,et al.  An Exergy-Based Methodology for Decision-Based Design of Integrated Aircraft Thermal Systems , 2000 .

[8]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  A Comparision of Thermodynamic Loss Models Suitable for Gas Turbine Propulsion: Theory and Taxonomy , 2000 .

[9]  Michael R. von Spakovsky,et al.  A Decomposition Strategy Applied to the Optimal Synthesis/Design and Operation of an Advanced Fighter Aircraft System: A Comparison With and Without Airframe Degrees of Freedom , 2003 .

[10]  Charles Suchomel,et al.  Exergy methods applied to the hypersonic vehicle challenge , 2001 .

[11]  David W. Riggins,et al.  High-speed engine/component performance assessment using exergy and thrust-based methods , 1996 .

[12]  David J. Moorhouse,et al.  Proposed System-Level Multidisciplinary Analysis Technique Based on Exergy Methods , 2003 .

[13]  Michael R. von Spakovsky,et al.  Development of Thermodynamic, Geometric, and Economic Models for Use in the Optimal Synthesis/Design of a PEM Fuel Cell Cogeneration System for Multi-Unit Residential Applications , 2004 .

[14]  Michael R. von Spakovsky,et al.  Optimal Synthesis/Design of a Pem Fuel Cell Cogeneration System for Multi-Unit Residential Applications–Application of a Decomposition Strategy , 2004 .

[15]  J. Anderson,et al.  Fundamentals of Aerodynamics , 1984 .

[16]  Gian Paolo Beretta,et al.  Thermodynamics: Foundations and Applications , 1991 .

[17]  Diego Fernando Rancruel,et al.  A Decomposition Strategy Based on Thermoeconomic Isolation Applied to the Optimal Synthesis/Design and Operation of an Advanced Fighter Aircraft System , 2003 .

[18]  Daniel Favrat,et al.  An Approach for the Time-Dependent Thermoeconomic Modeling and Optimization of Energy System Synthesis, Design and Operation (Part II : Reliability and Availability) , 1999 .

[19]  Diego Fernando Rancruel,et al.  Dynamic Synthesis/Design and Operation/Control Optimization Approach applied to a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell based Auxiliary Power Unit under Transient Conditions , 2005 .

[20]  Toshio Hatada,et al.  Heat Transfer Characteristics of Convex Louvered Fins for Air Conditioning Heat Exchangers : 1st Report, Experimental Study , 1984 .

[21]  David J. Moorhouse,et al.  Thermal Analysis of Hypersonic Inlet Flow with Exergy-Based Design Methods , 2002 .

[22]  A. London,et al.  Compact heat exchangers , 1960 .

[23]  Michael J. Moran,et al.  Availability analysis: A guide to efficient energy use , 1982 .

[24]  Michael R. von Spakovsky,et al.  Decomposition with Thermoeconomic Isolation Applied to the Optimal Synthesis/Design of an Advanced Tactical Aircraft System , 2003 .

[25]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  A Method for Propulsion Technology Evaluation Via Thermodynamic Work Potential , 2000 .

[26]  George Tsatsaronis,et al.  Exergoeconomic evaluation and optimization of energy systems — application to the CGAM problem , 1994 .

[27]  A. C. Hoffmann,et al.  AIChE Symposium Series , 1999 .

[28]  David W. Riggins,et al.  The Thermodynamic Continuum of Jet Engine Performance: The Principle of Lost Work due to Irreversibility in Aerospace Systems , 2003 .

[29]  Richard A. Gaggioli,et al.  Rational Objective Functions for Vehicles , 2003 .

[30]  Michael von Spakovsky,et al.  Application of Engineering Functional Analysis to the Analysis and Optimization of the CGAM Problem , 1994 .

[31]  Michael R. von Spakovsky,et al.  The Application of Decomposition to the Large Scale Synthesis/Design Optimization of Aircraft Energy Systems , 2001 .

[32]  Antonio Valero,et al.  Application of the exergetic cost theory to the CGAM problem , 1994 .

[33]  Daniel Favrat,et al.  An environomic approach for the modeling and optimization of a district heating network based on centralized and decentralized heat pumps, cogeneration and/or gas furnace. Part I: Methodology , 2000 .

[34]  Jack D. Mattingly,et al.  Aircraft engine design , 1987 .

[35]  Michael R. von Spakovsky,et al.  A Decomposition Approach for the Large Scale Synthesis Design Optimization of Highly Coupled, Highly Dynamic Energy Systems , 2001 .

[36]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THERMODYNAMIC LOSS MODELS APPLIED TO THE J-79 TURBOJET ENGINE , 2000 .

[37]  David W. Riggins,et al.  Evaluation of Performance Loss Methods for High-Speed Engines and Engine Components , 1997 .

[38]  D. Beecher,et al.  Effects of fin pattern on the air side heat transfer coefficient in plate finned tube heat exchangers , 1987 .

[39]  Michael R. von Spakovsky,et al.  Development and Application of a Dynamic Decomposition Strategy for the Optimal Synthesis/Design and Operational/Control of a SOFC Based APU Under Transient Conditions , 2005 .

[40]  E. S. Geskin,et al.  Application of the first and second laws to fuel minimization in a batch furnace , 1998 .

[41]  Michael R. von Spakovsky,et al.  Decomposition in Energy System Synthesis/Design Optimization for Stationary and Aerospace Applications , 2000 .

[42]  Jeffrey Robert Butt,et al.  A Study of Morphing Wing Effectiveness in Fighter Aircraft using Exergy Analysis and Global Optimization Techniques , 2005 .

[43]  Bryce Alexander Roth.  Work Potential Perspective of Engine Component Performance , 2002 .

[44]  Michael R. von Spakovsky,et al.  A Decomposition Strategy Based on Thermoeconomic Isolation Applied to the Optimal Synthesis/Design and Operation of a Fuel Cell Based Total Energy System , 2002 .

[45]  T. J. Rabas,et al.  Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Performance of Finned Tube Bundles , 1985 .

[46]  Kyle Charles Markell,et al.  Exergy Methods for the Generic Analysis and Optimization of Hypersonic Vehicle Concepts , 2005 .

[47]  A. Bejan.  Entropy Generation Minimization: The Method of Thermodynamic Optimization of Finite-Size Systems and Finite-Time Processes , 1995 .