Pilot cueing synergies for degraded visual environments

Operating in a degraded visual environment (DVE) poses a significant risk to helicopter operations. A DVE can be caused by partial or total loss of visibility from airborne dust, sand, or snow stirred up by the helicopter’s rotor downwash. A DVE can cause a loss of spatial orientation and situational awareness, which has on several occasions led to controlled flight into terrain, ground obstacle collisions, and the loss of aircraft and personnel. DVEs have driven the development of new display technologies, which in turn present new challenges, including the integration of scene imagery, visual symbology, tactile cueing, and aural cueing. In a full-motion DVE simulation study with seven test pilots, we evaluated aural and tactile cueing along with sensor imagery displayed on either a helmet-mounted display (HMD) or panel-mounted display (PMD). The symbology and forward looking infrared (FLIR) imagery were presented on a UH-60M PMD or a SA Photonics high definition, wide field-of-view, binocular HMD. Additionally, the synergistic effects of aural and tactile cues were assessed. Tactile cues were presented via belt, shoulder harness, and seat cushion using electromechanical tactile stimulators. Aural cues were presented via an HGU-56/P rotary-wing aircrew helmet. The compatibility and effectiveness of each combination of FLIR sensor imagery, selected display, and aural and tactile cueing set were evaluated with quantitative measures of flight performance, pilot subjective reports, and pilot psychophysiological measures.

[1]  Michelle N. Lumicao,et al.  EEG correlates of task engagement and mental workload in vigilance, learning, and memory tasks. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[2]  David H. Klyde,et al.  The Real-Flight Approach to Assess Flight Simulator Force Cueing Fidelity , 2013 .

[3]  J. Dusek,et al.  Impact of Incremental Increases in Cognitive Workload on Physiological Arousal and Performance in Young Adult Drivers , 2009 .

[4]  Robert J. Shively,et al.  Forward-Looking Integrated Symbology For 4-D Reroutable Helicopter Approach-To-Landing , 2010 .

[5]  John M. Flach,et al.  Information Processing in Aviation , 2010 .

[6]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  Effective Indices for Monitoring Mental Workload While Performing Multiple Tasks , 2015, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  Xi-Qing Sun,et al.  Heart Rate and Respiration Responses to Real Traffic Pattern Flight , 2008, Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback.

[8]  Spatial Multisensory Cueing to Support Visual Target-Acquisition Performance , 2012 .

[9]  Adelbert W. Bronkhorst,et al.  3-D Audio in the Fighter Cockpit Improves Task Performance , 2004 .

[10]  Linda R. Elliott,et al.  Development of Tactile and Haptic Systems for U.S. Infantry Navigation and Communication , 2011, HCI.

[11]  Angus H. Rupert,et al.  Coalition Warfare Program Tactile Situation Awareness System for Aviation Applications: System Development , 2014 .

[12]  Nadine Sarter,et al.  Multiple-Resource Theory as a Basis for Multimodal Interface Design: Success Stories, Qualifications, and Research Needs , 2006 .

[13]  Lynette A. Jones,et al.  Tactile Displays: Guidance for Their Design and Application , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Leonard C. Mead,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS IN ENGINEERING DESIGN , 1947 .

[15]  Lynette A. Jones,et al.  Getting the Buzz: What's Next for Tactile Information Delivery? , 2010 .

[16]  Chua Wei Liang Kenny,et al.  Association Testing-A Methodology for Selecting and Evaluating Audio Alerts , 2009 .

[17]  Sion Jennings,et al.  Flight-Test of a Tactile Situational Awareness System in a Land-based Deck Landing Task , 2004 .

[18]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Informing the Design of Multimodal Displays , 2011 .

[19]  N. Holmes The Principle of Inverse Effectiveness in Multisensory Integration: Some Statistical Considerations , 2009, Brain Topography.

[20]  Mickaël Causse,et al.  Failure to Detect Critical Auditory Alerts in the Cockpit , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Rebecca A. Grier How High is High? A Meta-Analysis of NASA-TLX Global Workload Scores , 2015 .

[22]  nbsp,et al.  Symbology for Brown-Out Landings: The First Simulation for the 3D-LZ Program , 2009 .

[23]  Matthew S. Prewett,et al.  A Review and Meta Analysis of Vibrotactile and Visual Information Displays , 2009 .

[24]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Good Vibrations: Tactile Feedback in Support of Attention Allocation and Human-Automation Coordination in Event-Driven Domains , 1999, Hum. Factors.