Bladder-sparing strategies in patients with clinically localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW Radical cystectomy is the standard of care for patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). In this context, bladder-sparing strategies (BSS) have been investigated as viable alternatives for patients who are unfit for radical cystectomy or aim to preserve their bladder without compromising oncological outcomes. This review aims to provide the most up-to-date evidence on BSSs as an alternative treatment for patients with MIBC. RECENT FINDINGS Different studies have highlighted the long-term efficacy of trimodal therapy or chemoradiation protocols. However, due to the lack of randomized controlled trials, there is still a lack of high-level evidence on BSS efficacy as compared to radical cystectomy. Consequently, the adoption of these approaches is still limited. A possible turning point could be represented by the introduction of immunotherapy, as several studies are investigating the potential combination with chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone. Patient selection, together with the implementation of new predictive biomarkers and imaging tools, may improve the efficacy of BSS in the near future. SUMMARY Radical cystectomy with perioperative chemotherapy remains the gold standard treatment for MIBC patients. Nevertheless, BSS can be considered a viable option in selected patients who desire to preserve their bladder. Further evidence is needed to clearly state the role of BSS in MIBC.