Anthropogenic Noise: Implications for Conservation

In the past 100 years, human activities have increased dramatically on both local and global scales, and as a result, levels of anthropogenic noise have risen in many habitats. Noise disturbance may have adverse effects for animals, including triggering of direct stress, acoustic masking of cues used to find prey and to avoid predators, and also disruption of the exchange of acoustic signals. Many species use acoustic signals in their reproduction, for example, to find mating partners. When noise masks these biologically important signals, and thus impairs effective communication, it can have negative effects on the animals’ breeding biology and thus may affect the viability of populations. It has been shown that many species are less abundant near anthropogenic noise sources, but researchers are only just beginning to identify the implications of increasing noise pollution for animal populations. We need to increase our understanding of how anthropogenic noise reduces the maximum distance at which one animal can recognize the acoustic signals of another in its natural habitat. Future studies that link anthropogenic noise with reproductive success are urgently needed to develop reasonable action plans for noise abatement before the voices of many animals vanish forever.

[1]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate , 2005 .

[2]  A. A. Ríos-Chelén,et al.  Strategies of song adaptation to urban noise in the house finch: syllable pitch plasticity or differential syllable use? , 2009 .

[3]  Jörg Lewald,et al.  High-frequency sound transmission in natural habitats: implications for the evolution of insect acoustic communication , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[4]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Auditory masking of anuran advertisement calls by road traffic noise , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Erin M. Bayne,et al.  Chronic industrial noise affects pairing success and age structure of ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla , 2006 .

[6]  F. Rheindt The impact of roads on birds: Does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? , 2003, Journal für Ornithologie.

[7]  Joachim Ostwald,et al.  Foraging bats avoid noise , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  Patrick J. O. Miller,et al.  Background noise constrains communication: acoustic masking of courtship song in the fruit fly Drosophila montana , 2009 .

[9]  H. Brumm The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird , 2004 .

[10]  M. Smotherman,et al.  Context-dependent effects of noise on echolocation pulse characteristics in free-tailed bats , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[11]  B. McCowan,et al.  Anthropogenic Noise and its Effect on Animal Communication: An Interface Between Comparative Psychology and Conservation Biology , 2003, International Journal of Comparative Psychology.

[12]  A. Horn,et al.  Ambient noise and the design of begging signals , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Cities Change the Songs of Birds , 2006, Current Biology.

[14]  R. Dooling,et al.  Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: estimating the active space of a signal , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[16]  Peter L. Tyack,et al.  Implications for marine mammals of large-scale changes in the marine acoustic environment , 2008 .

[17]  John L. Quinn,et al.  Noise, predation risk compensation and vigilance in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs , 2006 .

[18]  L. E. Wysocki,et al.  Effects of noise exposure on click detection and the temporal resolution ability of the goldfish auditory system , 2005, Hearing Research.

[19]  Ruud Foppen,et al.  The effects of traffic on the density of breeding birds in Dutch agricultural grasslands , 1996 .

[20]  Thierry Lengagne,et al.  Traffic noise affects communication behaviour in a breeding anuran, Hyla arborea , 2008 .

[21]  Stan Boutin,et al.  Impacts of Chronic Anthropogenic Noise from Energy‐Sector Activity on Abundance of Songbirds in the Boreal Forest , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[22]  Friedrich Ladich,et al.  Ship noise and cortisol secretion in European freshwater fishes , 2006 .

[23]  F. Rheindt The impact of roads on birds: Does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? , 2003 .

[24]  Clinton D. Francis,et al.  Noise Pollution Changes Avian Communities and Species Interactions , 2009, Current Biology.

[25]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[26]  H. Brumm,et al.  Blackbirds sing higher-pitched songs in cities: adaptation to habitat acoustics or side-effect of urbanization? , 2009, Animal Behaviour.