Cardinal and deep uterosacral ligament lines of action: MRI based 3D technique development and preliminary findings in normal women

Introduction and hypothesisThe cardinal ligament (CL) and deep uterosacral ligament (US) play a critical role in utero-vaginal support. This study aims to quantify their geometrical relationships in living women using a MRI-based 3D technique.MethodsThe angles between ligaments, the ligaments length and curvature were assessed on 3D models constructed from twenty MRIs of volunteers with normal support. How angle variation theoretically affects ligament tension was investigated using a simplified biomechanical model.ResultsThe CLs are 18.1 ° ± 6.8 °(SD) from the cephalic-caudal body axis , and the USs are dorsally directed and 92.5 ° ± 13.5 from the body axis. The CLs are longer and more curved than US. The theoretical calculated tension on CL is 52 % larger than that on US.ConclusionsThe CL is relatively parallel to the body axis while the US is dorsally directed. The tensions on these ligaments are affected by their orientations.

[1]  F. Blaisdell.  The anatomy of the sacro‐uterine ligaments , 1917 .

[2]  R. Campbell.  The anatomy and histology of the sacrouterine ligaments. , 1950, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  R. T. Woodburne,et al.  THE GROSS AND MICROSCOPIC ANATOMY OF THE TRANSVERSE CERVICAL LIGAMENT. , 1964, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  J. Delancey,et al.  A technique to study the passive supports of the uterus. , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  J. Delancey.  Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  F A Jolesz,et al.  MR imaging of pelvic floor continence mechanisms in the supine and sitting positions. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  J. Polak,et al.  Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical hysterectomy and simple hysterectomy , 2000, Cancer.

[8]  Visibility of pelvic organ support system structures in magnetic resonance images without an endovaginal coil. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. , 2002, Radiology.

[10]  Ph.D. Ahmed Shafik M.D.,et al.  Etiology of the Resting Myoelectric Activity of the Levator Ani Muscle: Physioanatomic Study with a New Theory , 2003, World Journal of Surgery.

[11]  R McN Alexander,et al.  Modelling approaches in biomechanics. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  J. Ashton-Miller,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Uterosacral Ligament Origin and Insertion Points by Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  A. O'Boyle,et al.  Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  H. Hussain,et al.  The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  H. Hussain,et al.  Levator plate angle in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared to women with normal support using dynamic MR imaging. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  L. Brubaker,et al.  Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  J. Ashton-Miller,et al.  Interaction Among Apical Support, Levator Ani Impairment, and Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  J. Jelovsek,et al.  Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life. , 2006, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  D. Patel,et al.  Distribution of pelvic organ support measures in a population-based sample of middle-aged, community-dwelling African American and white women in southeastern Michigan. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  James A Ashton-Miller,et al.  A 3D finite element model of anterior vaginal wall support to evaluate mechanisms underlying cystocele formation. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  J. Ashton-Miller,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional model of anterior vaginal wall position at rest and maximal strain in women with and without prolapse , 2010, International Urogynecology Journal.

[22]  Y. Hsu,et al.  Do repetitive Valsalva maneuvers change maximum prolapse on dynamic MRI? , 2010, International Urogynecology Journal.

[23]  B. Haylen,et al.  Surgical anatomy of the uterosacral ligament , 2010, International Urogynecology Journal.