Regional climate model downscaling of the U.S. summer climate and future change

[1] A mesoscale model (MM5)–based regional climate model (CMM5) integration driven by the Parallel Climate Model (PCM), a fully coupled atmosphere-ocean-land-ice general circulation model (GCM), for the present (1986–1995) summer season climate is first compared with observations to study the CMM5's downscaling skill and uncertainty over the United States. The results indicate that the CMM5, with its finer resolution (30 km) and more comprehensive physics, simulates the present U.S. climate more accurately than the driving PCM, especially for precipitation, including summer mean patterns, diurnal cycles, and daily frequency distributions. Hence the CMM5 downscaling provides a credible means to improve GCM climate simulations. A parallel CMM5 integration driven by the PCM future (2041–2050) projection is then analyzed to determine the downscaling impact on regional climate changes. It is shown that the CMM5 generates climate change patterns very different from those predicted by the driving PCM. A key difference is a summer “warming hole” over the central United States in the CMM5 relative to the PCM. This study shows that the CMM5 downscaling can significantly reduce GCM biases in simulating the present climate and that this improvement has important consequences for future projections of regional climate changes. For both the present and future climate simulations, the CMM5 results are sensitive to the cumulus parameterization, with strong regional dependence. The deficiency in representing convection is likely the major reason for the PCM's unrealistic simulation of U.S. precipitation patterns and perhaps also for its large warming in the central United States.

[1]  J. Seinfeld.  RETHINKING THE OZONE PROBLEM IN URBAN AND REGIONAL AIR POLLUTION , 1991 .

[2]  Guang J. Zhang,et al.  Roles of tropospheric and boundary layer forcing in the diurnal cycle of convection in the U.S. southern great plains , 2003 .

[3]  J. Roads,et al.  U.S. Climate Sensitivity Simulated with the NCEP Regional Spectral Model , 2004 .

[4]  R. Oglesby,et al.  Effects of resolution and physics on precipitation in the NCAR Community Climate Model , 1997 .

[5]  G. Grell.  Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterizations , 1993 .

[6]  M. Kanamitsu,et al.  NCEP–DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2) , 2002 .

[7]  Raquel V. Francisco,et al.  Regional Climate Information—Evaluation and Projections , 2001 .

[8]  Christopher A. Davis,et al.  Coherence of Warm-Season Continental Rainfall in Numerical Weather Prediction Models , 2003 .

[9]  Kenneth E. Kunkel,et al.  Development of a Regional Climate Model for U.S. Midwest Applications. Part I: Sensitivity to Buffer Zone Treatment , 2001 .

[10]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Climates of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries Simulated by the NCAR Climate System Model , 2001 .

[11]  J. Christensen,et al.  Evaluation of uncertainties in regional climate change simulations , 2001 .

[12]  N. McFarlane,et al.  Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model , 1995, Data, Models and Analysis.

[13]  K. Kunkel,et al.  Regional Climate Model Simulation of U.S. Precipitation during 1982–2002. Part I: Annual Cycle , 2004 .

[14]  J. Gregory,et al.  A comparison of extreme European daily precipitation simulated by a global and a regional climate model for present and future climates , 2001 .

[15]  G. Zhang,et al.  Simulation of the North American Monsoon by the NCAR CCM3 and Its Sensitivity to Convection Parameterization , 2006 .

[16]  Kevin E. Trenberth,et al.  Observed and model‐simulated diurnal cycles of precipitation over the contiguous United States , 1999 .

[17]  R. Arritt,et al.  Altered hydrologic feedback in a warming climate introduces a “warming hole” , 2004 .

[18]  Y. Qian,et al.  The Sensitivity of Precipitation and Snowpack Simulations to Model Resolution via Nesting in Regions of Complex Terrain , 2003 .

[19]  J. Janowiak,et al.  A Gridded Hourly Precipitation Data Base for the United States , 1996 .

[20]  K. Emanuel,et al.  The Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models , 1993 .

[21]  John M. Wallace,et al.  Diurnal Variations in Precipitation and Thunderstorm Frequency over the Conterminous United States , 1975 .

[22]  K. Kunkel,et al.  Climate Atlas of Illinois , 2004 .

[23]  B. Bonan,et al.  A Land Surface Model (LSM Version 1.0) for Ecological, Hydrological, and Atmospheric Studies: Technical Description and User's Guide , 1996 .

[24]  Xin‐Zhong Liang,et al.  Regional climate model simulation of U.S. soil temperature and moisture during 1982-2002 , 2005 .

[25]  Linda O. Mearns,et al.  Regional climate research - Needs and opportunities , 2003 .

[26]  J. Hack.  Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model (CCM2) , 1994 .

[27]  A. Craig,et al.  Factors that affect the amplitude of El Nino in global coupled climate models , 2001 .

[28]  U. Willén,et al.  European climate in the late twenty-first century: regional simulations with two driving global models and two forcing scenarios , 2004 .

[29]  John S. Kain,et al.  Convective parameterization for mesoscale models : The Kain-Fritsch Scheme , 1993 .

[30]  Kenneth E. Kunkel,et al.  Regional climate model simulation of summer precipitation diurnal cycle over the United States , 2004 .

[31]  K. Trenberth,et al.  The Diurnal Cycle and Its Depiction in the Community Climate System Model , 2004 .

[32]  W. G. Strand,et al.  The ACPI Climate Change Simulations , 2004 .

[33]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  Impact of a Revised Convective Triggering Mechanism on CAM2 Model Simulations: Results from Short-Range Weather Forecasts , 2004 .

[34]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Regional Nested Model Simulations of Present Day and 2 × CO2 Climate over the Central Plains of the U.S. , 1998 .

[35]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Ensemble Simulation of Twenty-First Century Climate Changes: Business-as-Usual versus CO2 Stabilization , 2001 .

[36]  James J. Hack,et al.  Response of Climate Simulation to a New Convective Parameterization in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model (CCM3) , 1998 .

[37]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Predictability and uncertainty in a regional climate model , 2003 .

[38]  E. Trenberth,et al.  Vertical Interpolation and Truncation of Model-coordinate Data , 1993 .

[39]  R. Arritt,et al.  Observations and Regional Climate Model Simulations of Heavy Precipitation Events and Seasonal Anomalies: A Comparison , 2002 .

[40]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  Impact of a revised convective triggering mechanism on Community Atmosphere Model, Version 2, simulations: Results from short‐range weather forecasts , 2004 .

[41]  Lake Springfield,et al.  Illinois State Water Survey , 1991 .

[42]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Comparison of climate change scenarios generated from regional climate model experiments and statistical downscaling , 1999 .

[43]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation and Sensitivity , 2001 .

[44]  G. Grell,et al.  A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques , 2002 .

[45]  P. Stone,et al.  A Case Study of the Adequacy of GCM Simulations for Input to Regional Climate Change Assessments. , 1996 .

[46]  W. G. Strand,et al.  Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations , 2000 .

[47]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Effects of Clouds, Soil Moisture, Precipitation, and Water Vapor on Diurnal Temperature Range , 1999 .