Towards a Model of Virtual Proxemics for Wearables

We present a Virtual Proxemics Model inspired by Hall’s Proxemics Theory targeting wearable technology design and use. In Virtual Proxemics the degree of data control defines different levels of data spaces personal closeness including: Intimate, Personal, Social and Public in the same way Hall’s proxemics defines these for physical distance from a person. This model is important for wearable technology design due to the design characteristics of wearables such as: attention-free, invisibility, closeness to the body, sensory linked, controllability and always-on that may compromise a wearer’s ability to adequately control data either coming to them or being sent. We describe an experience with a wearable system, called ‘The Cat in the Map.’ In this system, when strangers accessed the wearer’s Intimate data space, she became uncomfortable, consistent with the model. Likewise, when her intimate relations accessed the same data space, she enjoyed the experience. Thus, we see that Virtual Proxemics Model aligns with wearer’s experience of data control that may be suitable for the design of automated data access control mechanisms.

[1]  K J Biba,et al.  Integrity Considerations for Secure Computer Systems , 1977 .

[2]  Florian Mueller,et al.  Watch your steps: designing a semi-public display to promote physical activity , 2013, IE.

[3]  Robert S. Allison,et al.  Personal Space in Virtual Reality , 2003, TAP.

[4]  D. E. Bell,et al.  Secure Computer Systems : Mathematical Foundations , 2022 .

[5]  Anu Lehtiö,et al.  You Can Wear It, But Do They Want to Share It or Stare at It? , 2011, INTERACT.

[6]  Thecla Schiphorst,et al.  Designing a wearable social network , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[8]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[9]  Nicolai Marquardt,et al.  Proxemic interactions: the new ubicomp? , 2011, INTR.

[10]  Yoshio Matsumoto,et al.  How Do People Perceive and Trust a Lifelike Robot , 2013 .

[11]  Tek-Jin Nam,et al.  Biosignal sharing for affective connectedness , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  Richard Martin,et al.  Design for wearability , 1998, Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Cat. No.98EX215).

[14]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Fundamentals of Wearable Computers and Augumented Reality , 2000 .

[15]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[16]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Sociocultural Conventions in Avatar-Mediated Nonverbal Communication: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Virtual Proxemics , 2012 .

[17]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace , 1999 .

[18]  Steve Mann,et al.  Smart clothing: the shift to wearable computing , 1996, CACM.

[19]  Elena Mugellini,et al.  Hugginess: encouraging interpersonal touch through smart clothes , 2014, ISWC '14 Adjunct.

[20]  Ana Viseu,et al.  Simulation and augmentation: Issues of wearable computers , 2003, Ethics and Information Technology.

[21]  Kris Luyten,et al.  Suit up!: enabling eyes-free interactions on jacket buttons , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[22]  Tek-Jin Nam,et al.  'STEPS': walking on the music, moving with light breathing , 2010, CHI EA '10.

[23]  Neil Gershenfeld,et al.  When things start to think , 1999 .

[24]  Edward T. Hall,et al.  Handbook for Proxemic Research , 1974 .