Effectiveness of Physiological and Psychological Features to Estimate Helicopter Pilots' Workload: A Bayesian Network Approach

Despite growing interest over the decades, the question of estimating cognitive workload of operators involved in complex multitask operations, such as helicopter pilots, remains a key issue. One of the main difficulties facing workload inference models is that no single specific indicator of workload exists, so that multiple sources of information have to be inputted to the model. The question then arises as to the nature and the quantity of features to be used for increasing model performance. In this research, done in cooperation with Eurocopter, the effectiveness of physiological, psychological, and cognitive features for estimating helicopter pilots' workload was systematically investigated, using Bayesian networks (BNs). The study took place in two different contexts: a constrained laboratory situation with low ecological validity and a more realistic and challenging situation relying on virtual reality. The constrained conditions of the laboratory study allowed us for testing various combinations of entropy-based physiological, cognitive, and affect features as inputs of BN models. These three different kinds of features are shown to carry complementary information that can be used with advantage by the model. The results also suggest that increasing the number of physiological inputs improves the model performance. The second study aimed at challenging some of these conclusions in a more ecological context, by using the NH90 full-flight simulator of the Helisim company. The results emphasize the problem of accessing the ground truth, as well as the need for an efficient feature selection or extraction step prior to the classification step.

[1]  Stuart J. Russell,et al.  Dynamic bayesian networks: representation, inference and learning , 2002 .

[2]  David Heckerman,et al.  A Tutorial on Learning with Bayesian Networks , 1998, Learning in Graphical Models.

[3]  Nanning Zheng,et al.  Cognitive Cars: A New Frontier for ADAS Research , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[4]  Patrick Gaudreau,et al.  Positive and negative affective states in a performance-related setting: Testing the factorial structure of the panas across two samples of french-canadian participants. , 2006 .

[5]  B. Cain A Review of the Mental Workload Literature , 2007 .

[6]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Inferring psychological significance from physiological signals. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[7]  Glenn F. Wilson,et al.  Real-Time Assessment of Mental Workload Using Psychophysiological Measures and Artificial Neural Networks , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[9]  Tanja Schultz,et al.  Multimodal Recognition of Cognitive Workload for Multitasking in the Car , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Human factors and safety in the design of intelligent vehicle-highway systems (IVHS) , 1992 .

[11]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  M. Dawson,et al.  The electrodermal system , 2007 .

[13]  S. Filipović,et al.  Psychophysiology: Human Behavior and Physiological Response (4th ed.) , 2001 .

[14]  Christophe Bourdin,et al.  Cognitive workload and affective state: A computational study using Bayesian networks , 2012, 2012 6th IEEE International Conference Intelligent Systems.

[15]  Masoud Nikravesh,et al.  Feature Extraction - Foundations and Applications , 2006, Feature Extraction.

[16]  Jennifer Healey,et al.  Detecting stress during real-world driving tasks using physiological sensors , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[17]  Pavlo A. Krokhmal,et al.  An algorithm for online detection of temporal changes in operator cognitive state using real-time psychophysiological data , 2010, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[18]  Nico H. Frijda,et al.  Varieties of affect: Emotions and episodes, moods, and sentiments. , 1994 .

[19]  P. Salovey,et al.  TARGET ARTICLES: "Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Findings, and Implications" , 2004 .

[20]  Sandra G. Hart NASA Task Load Index (TLX). Volume 1.0; Computerized Version , 1986 .

[21]  Christophe Bourdin,et al.  Bayesian Network classifiers inferring workload from physiological features: Compared performance , 2012, 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[22]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  From error probability to information theoretic (multi-modal) signal processing , 2005, Signal Process..

[23]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[24]  Changchun Liu,et al.  An empirical study of machine learning techniques for affect recognition in human–robot interaction , 2006, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[25]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[26]  Rafael A. Calvo,et al.  Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[27]  Yorgos Goletsis,et al.  Real-Time Driver's Stress Event Detection , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[28]  Keiichi Uchimura,et al.  Driver Inattention Monitoring System for Intelligent Vehicles: A Review , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[29]  F. Thomas Eggemeier,et al.  Workload assessment methodology. , 1986 .

[30]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Learning-Based Driver Workload Estimation , 2008, Computational Intelligence in Automotive Applications.

[31]  Rouja Nikolova,et al.  Functional Determination of the Operator State in the Interaction of Humans with Automated Systems , 2003 .

[32]  André Charles,et al.  Fatigue, sleepiness, and performance in simulated versus real driving conditions. , 2005, Sleep.

[33]  Anthony F. Norcio,et al.  Adaptive human-computer interfaces: a literature survey and perspective , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[34]  Changxu Wu,et al.  A Queueing Model Based Intelligent Human–Machine Task Allocator , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[35]  A. Hasman,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference , 1991 .

[36]  Zhiwei Zhu,et al.  Toward a decision-theoretic framework for affect recognition and user assistance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[37]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[38]  A. Isen,et al.  An Influence of Positive Affect on Decision Making in Complex Situations: Theoretical Issues With Practical Implications , 2001 .

[39]  Michela Terenzi,et al.  Using the Distribution of Eye Fixations to Assess Pilots' Mental Workload , 2006 .

[40]  Marco Botta,et al.  Evaluation of Distraction in a Driver-Vehicle-Environment Framework: An Application of Different Data-Mining Techniques , 2009, ICDM.

[41]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer; , 1984 .

[42]  Luis Maldonado Ramos,et al.  Alcalá de Henares , 2005 .