MODELING ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES ACROSS SCALES

The issue of scaling impinges on every aspect of landscape ecology and much of ecology in general. Consequently, the topic has invited a vast commentary. One result of scaling research is so-called scaling laws that describe how observations scale (e.g., as power laws). Importantly, such scaling rules seldom derive from a process-based understanding of why they emerge. Alternatively, the task of scaling is often addressed via simulation models. This is a scaling operation about which we are somewhat less confident, although recent advances in computing power and computational statistics provide for some promising new solutions. Here, I focus on methods for scaling simulations developed at fine grain and small extent, to their implications over much larger extent. The intent in scaling is to simplify the model while retaining those details essential for larger-scale applications. This approach should lead to scaling rules that are well founded in fine-scale ecological process and yet useful for making predictions at the larger scales of management and environmental policy.

[1]  R. Gardner,et al.  Evaluating empirical scaling relations of pattern metrics with simulated landscapes , 2004 .

[2]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  Bayesian inference in ecology , 2004 .

[3]  S. Pacala,et al.  A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED) , 2001 .

[4]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Detecting Critical Scales in Fragmented Landscapes , 1997 .

[5]  L. Tischendorf Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently? , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  A scale invariant coupling of plants, water, energy, and terrain , 2002 .

[7]  M. Huston,et al.  A theory of the spatial and temporal dynamics of plant communities , 1989, Vegetatio.

[8]  W. Baker A review of models of landscape change , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[9]  Marc Bélisle,et al.  MEASURING LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: THE CHALLENGE OF BEHAVIORAL LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY , 2005 .

[10]  Dean L. Urban,et al.  Transition and Gap Models of Forest Dynamics , 1995 .

[11]  JAMES R. MILLER,et al.  Spatial Extrapolation: The Science of Predicting Ecological Patterns and Processes , 2004 .

[12]  Anthony W King,et al.  Aggregating Fine-Scale Ecological Knowledge to Model Coarser-Scale Attributes of Ecosystems. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[13]  Anthony W. King,et al.  Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: when do spatial pattern and dispersal behavior really matter? , 2002 .

[14]  Dean L. Urban,et al.  Estimating parameters of forest patch transition models from gap models , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  Dean L. Urban,et al.  Using model analysis to design monitoring programs for landscape management and impact assessment. , 2000 .

[16]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape , 2000, Nature.

[17]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[18]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[20]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Motivation and Benefits of Complex Systems Approaches in Ecology , 1998, Ecosystems.

[21]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[22]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Transmutation and functional representation of heterogeneous landscapes , 1991, Landscape Ecology.

[23]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant Succession: Life History and Competition , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[24]  Carol A. Wessman,et al.  Spatial Scales and Global Change: Bridging the Gap from Plots to GCM Grid Cells , 1992 .

[25]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Reid's Paradox of Rapid Plant Migration Dispersal theory and interpretation of paleoecological records , 1998 .

[26]  A. Prasad,et al.  PREDICTING ABUNDANCE OF 80 TREE SPECIES FOLLOWING CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[27]  B. Danielson,et al.  Spatially Explicit Population Models: Current Forms and Future Uses , 1995 .

[28]  Carol Miller,et al.  A model of surface fire, climate and forest pattern in the Sierra Nevada, California , 1999 .

[29]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[30]  Charles B. Halpern,et al.  Potential response of pacific northwestern forests to climatic change, effects of stand age and initial composition , 1993 .

[31]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[32]  R. Levins Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[33]  Tarmo K. Remmel,et al.  On the role of spatial stochastic models in understanding landscape indices in ecology , 2003 .

[34]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  Seed Dispersal Near and Far: Patterns Across Temperate and Tropical Forests , 1999 .

[35]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth , 1972 .

[36]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory , 2000 .

[37]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Using Mechanistic Models to Scale Ecological Processes across Space and Time , 2003 .

[38]  Alain Franc,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics as a contact process on a graph , 2004 .

[39]  Jianguo Wu Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[40]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  T. F. H. Allen,et al.  Ordination of simulated complex forest succession: A new test of ordination methods , 1983, Vegetatio.

[42]  L. M. Berliner,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian space-time models , 1998, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[43]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements: I. The design of a northeastern forest simulator , 1993 .

[44]  B. Hayes Graph Theory in Practice: Part II , 2000, American Scientist.

[45]  David L. Strayer,et al.  What kind of spatial and temporal details are required in models of heterogeneous systems , 2003 .

[46]  H. Shugart,et al.  Models of forest dynamics based on roles of tree species , 1996 .

[47]  Patrick N. Halpin,et al.  Forest gradient response in Sierran landscapes: the physical template , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[48]  E. Rastetter,et al.  PREDICTING GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY IN TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS , 1997 .

[49]  S. Garman Design and evaluation of a forest landscape change model for western Oregon , 2004 .

[50]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to map spatial extent , 2001 .

[51]  James S. Clark,et al.  UNCERTAINTY AND VARIABILITY IN DEMOGRAPHY AND POPULATION GROWTH: A HIERARCHICAL APPROACH , 2003 .

[52]  Debra P. C. Peters,et al.  Strategies for ecological extrapolation , 2004 .

[53]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern , 1987, Landscape Ecology.

[54]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Importance of patch scale vs landscape scale on selected forest birds , 2002 .

[55]  O. Ovaskainen,et al.  Spatially structured metapopulation models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity. , 2001, Theoretical population biology.

[56]  D. Schneider The Rise of the Concept of Scale in Ecology , 2001 .

[57]  Anthony W. King,et al.  The Use and Misuse of Neutral Landscape Models in Ecology , 1997 .