National intellectual capital model and measurement

Over the past few decades, intangible assets, such as knowledge, patents, and innovation, have been identified as fundamental sources of wealth and progress. These assets represent a major concern for business firms, their stakeholders, policy makers and world organisations for proper positioning in the world competition and for wise resource allocation. As a result, measuring the intangibles has become a challenge. This paper reports a validated national intellectual capital measurement model, consisting human capital, market capital, process capital, renewal capital and financial capital that enables nations to conduct comparisons, benchmarking, refining and re-orienting national development strategies for sustaining their competitive advantages. The national intellectual capital ranking for 41 countries and their dynamic development are also elaborated.

[1]  Daniela Carlucci,et al.  The Knoware Tree and the Regional Intellectual Capital Index , 2008 .

[2]  A. Bounfour,et al.  Understanding dynamics of intellectual capital of nations , 2008 .

[3]  L. Edvinsson,et al.  National intellectual capital: comparison of the Nordic countries , 2008 .

[4]  Phil Hancock,et al.  The Evolving research on intellectual capital , 2008 .

[5]  T. A. Stewart Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations , 1997 .

[6]  Ante Pulic,et al.  Chapter 12 – Value Creation Efficiency at National and Regional Levels: Case Study—Croatia and the European Union , 2005 .

[7]  Dorota Weziak,et al.  Measurement of national intellectual capital: application to EU countries , 2007 .

[8]  Ahmed Bounfour,et al.  The IC‐dVAL approach , 2003 .

[9]  Ridha M. Al‐Khayyat,et al.  The Intellectual Capital Performance of KuwaitiBanks: An Application of vaicTM1 Model , 2011 .

[10]  Annabel Bismuth,et al.  Creating value from intellectual assets , 2008 .

[11]  Yogesh Malhotra,et al.  Knowledge Assets in the Global Economy: Assessment of National Intellectual Capital , 2000, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[12]  N. Carr IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[13]  M. Malone,et al.  Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower , 1997 .

[14]  Sigal Shachar,et al.  Chapter 9 – The Intellectual Capital of the State of Israel , 2005 .

[15]  Juan Ignacio Dalmau-Porta,et al.  Which IC components explain national IC stocks , 2007 .

[16]  A. Bounfour,et al.  Intellectual Capital for Communities: Nations, Regions, and Cities , 2005 .

[17]  D. Archibugi,et al.  Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice , 2005 .

[18]  N. Bontis Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital , 2001 .

[19]  Yogesh Malhora,et al.  Knowledge assets in the global economy: assessment of national intellectual capital , 2001 .

[20]  林月雲,et al.  What National Intellectual Capital Indices Can Tell About the Global Economic Crisis of 2007-2009? , 2009 .

[21]  Fulvio Castellacci,et al.  The technology clubs: the distribution of knowledge across nations , 2008 .

[22]  J. Collins,et al.  Level 5 leadership. The triumph of humility and fierce resolve. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[23]  Leif Edvinsson,et al.  The New Knowledge Economics , 2002 .

[24]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Chapter 8 – National Intellectual Capital Index: The Benchmarking of Arab Countries , 2005 .

[25]  Leif Edvinsson,et al.  National Intellectual Capital: A Comparison of 40 Countries , 2010 .

[26]  National Statistics—Portrait of the Value Floor , 2000 .

[27]  Pirjo Ståhle,et al.  Intellectual Capital and National Competitiveness: A Critical Examination. Case Finland , 2005, ECKM.

[28]  Agustín J. Sánchez Medina,et al.  Intellectual Capital and Sustainable Development on Islands: An Application to the Case of Gran Canaria , 2007 .