Two decades of digital photogrammetry: Revisiting Chandler’s 1999 paper on “Effective application of automated digital photogrammetry for geomorphological research” – a synthesis

Digital photogrammetry has experienced rapid development regarding the technology involved and its ease of use over the past two decades. We revisit the work of Jim Chandler who in 1999 published a technical communication seeking to familiarise novice users of photogrammetric methods with important theoretical concepts and practical considerations. In doing so, we assess considerations such as camera calibration and the need for photo-control and check points, as they apply to modern software and workflows, in particular for structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry. We also highlight the implications of lightweight drones being the new platform of choice for many photogrammetry-based studies in the geosciences. Finally, we present three examples based on our own work, showing the opportunities that SfM photogrammetry offers at different scales and systems: at the micro-scale for monitoring geomorphological change, and at the meso-scale for hydrological modelling and the reconstruction of vegetation canopies. Our examples showcase developments and applications of photogrammetry which go beyond what was considered feasible 20 years ago and indicate future directions that applications may take. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that, in-line with Chandler’s recommendations, the pre-calibration of consumer-grade cameras, instead of relying entirely on self-calibration by software, can yield palpable benefits in micro-scale applications and that measurements of sufficient control points are still central to generating reproducible, high-accuracy products. With the unprecedented ease of use and wide areas of application, scientists applying photogrammetric methods would do well to remember basic considerations and seek methods for the validation of generated products.

[1]  James P. McNamara,et al.  An approach to understanding hydrologic connectivity on the hillslope and the implications for nutrient transport , 2003 .

[2]  M. Jadamec,et al.  The role of rheology and slab shape on rapid mantle flow: Three‐dimensional numerical models of the Alaska slab edge , 2012 .

[3]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Remote Sensing of Vegetation Structure Using Computer Vision , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[4]  A. Kaiser,et al.  Feasibility of High-Resolution Soil Erosion Measurements by Means of Rainfall Simulations and SfM Photogrammetry , 2016 .

[5]  S. Lane,et al.  Structure from motion (SFM) photogrammetry , 2015 .

[6]  L. Wallace,et al.  Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2016 .

[7]  Marc Olano,et al.  Optimal Altitude, Overlap, and Weather Conditions for Computer Vision UAV Estimates of Forest Structure , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[8]  S. Robson,et al.  Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground‐based image networks , 2014 .

[9]  Toby N. Tonkin,et al.  Ground-Control Networks for Image Based Surface Reconstruction: An Investigation of Optimum Survey Designs Using UAV Derived Imagery and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[10]  Luis Alonso,et al.  Angular Dependency of Hyperspectral Measurements over Wheat Characterized by a Novel UAV Based Goniometer , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Mark W. Smith,et al.  Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography , 2016 .

[12]  Dimitri Lague,et al.  3D Terrestrial LiDAR data classification of complex natural scenes using a multi-scale dimensionality criterion: applications in geomorphology , 2011, ArXiv.

[13]  A. Klik,et al.  Soil surface roughness measurement—methods, applicability, and surface representation , 2005 .

[14]  Anette Eltner,et al.  Time lapse structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry for continuous geomorphic monitoring , 2017 .

[15]  Marco Diani,et al.  Real-time 3D reconstruction from images taken from an UAV , 2015 .

[16]  Massimiliano Favalli,et al.  Rapid Updating and Improvement of Airborne LIDAR DEMs Through Ground-Based SfM 3-D Modeling of Volcanic Features , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Mozhdeh Shahbazi,et al.  Uav-Based Point Cloud Generation for Open-Pit Mine Modelling , 2015 .

[18]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  High spatial resolution three-dimensional mapping of vegetation spectral dynamics using computer vision , 2013 .

[19]  Mike J. Smith,et al.  Cameras and settings for aerial surveys in the geosciences , 2017 .

[20]  Wim Klaassen,et al.  The contribution of ocean‐leaving DMS to the global atmospheric burdens of DMS, MSA, SO2, and NSS SO4= , 2003 .

[21]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Issues in Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Data Collection of Complex Forest Environments , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[22]  J. Chandler,et al.  Variability of interrill erosion at low slopes , 2011 .

[23]  Rob Jamieson,et al.  Sensitivity of DEM, slope, aspect and watershed attributes to LiDAR measurement uncertainty. , 2016 .

[24]  S. Robson,et al.  Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application , 2012 .

[25]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Direct Georeferencing of Ultrahigh-Resolution UAV Imagery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  Andrew M. Cunliffe,et al.  Ultra-fine grain landscape-scale quantification of dryland vegetation structure with drone-acquired structure-from-motion photogrammetry , 2016 .

[27]  J. Chandler Effective application of automated digital photogrammetry for geomorphological research: Earth Surf , 1999 .

[28]  D. Rieke-Zapp,et al.  Rill development and soil erosion: a laboratory study of slope and rainfall intensity , 2010 .

[29]  S. Robson,et al.  Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: Ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment , 2016 .

[30]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[31]  Tetsuji Ota,et al.  Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Structure from Motion Approach with Aerial Photographs in a Seasonal Tropical Forest , 2015 .

[32]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models , 2006 .

[33]  S. Robson,et al.  3‐D uncertainty‐based topographic change detection with structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry: precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys , 2017 .

[34]  C. Ginzler,et al.  Snow depth mapping in high-alpine catchments using digital photogrammetry , 2015 .

[35]  Adam J. Mathews,et al.  Visualizing and Quantifying Vineyard Canopy LAI Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Collected High Density Structure from Motion Point Cloud , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[36]  Danilo Schneider,et al.  Analysis of Different Methods for 3D Reconstruction of Natural Surfaces from Parallel‐Axes UAV Images , 2015 .

[37]  K. McGwire,et al.  Assessing the performance of structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry and terrestrial LiDAR for reconstructing soil surface microtopography of naturally vegetated plots , 2016 .

[38]  J. Fryer,et al.  Metric capabilities of low‐cost digital cameras for close range surface measurement , 2005 .

[39]  Heiner Kuhlmann,et al.  Accuracy Analysis of a Multi-View Stereo Approach for Phenotyping of Tomato Plants at the Organ Level , 2015, Sensors.

[40]  David J. Selkowitz,et al.  An Automated Approach for Mapping Persistent Ice and Snow Cover over High Latitude Regions , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[41]  Serge A. Wich,et al.  Location, location, location: considerations when using lightweight drones in challenging environments , 2018 .

[42]  Gerhard Krieger,et al.  The global TanDEM-X DEM — A unique data set , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[43]  S. M. Jong,et al.  Mapping landslide displacements using Structure from Motion (SfM) and image correlation of multi-temporal UAV photography , 2014 .

[44]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[45]  Farhad Samadzadegan,et al.  EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL OF RTK-UAV FOR AUTOMATIC POINT CLOUD GENERATION IN 3D RAPID MAPPING , 2016 .

[46]  P. Benaud Exploring the multiple techniques available for developing an understanding of soil erosion in the UK , 2017 .