Fresnel volume migration of single-component seismic data

Standard implementations of Kirchhoff prestack depth migration (PSDM) distribute the recorded wavefield along two-way-traveltime isochrons and an image is generated by constructive interference of these isochrons along the actual reflector elements. Beside the recent developments of wave-equation-based approaches, Kirchhoff PSDM is still considered widely as a state-of-the-art technique in obtaining high-quality images of the subsurface, particularly for highly irregular survey layouts and target-oriented imaging tasks. However, for sparse sampling or limited aperture, the resulting image is affected by significant migration noise as a result of limited constructive interference of the back-propagated wavefield. Some modifications have been proposed to reduce these artifacts. These modifications include constructing a specular path of wave propagation, derived from estimates of the emergent angle of coherent phases in the seismogram section, and the mainly heuristic restriction of the imaging operator to the neighborhood of that wavepath. Our approach uses Fresnel volumes to restrict the migration operator in a physically frequency-dependent way. Using the emergent angle at the receiver, determined by a local slowness analysis, a ray is propagated into the subsurface; the back-propagation of the wavefield is restricted to the vicinity of this ray according to its approximated Fresnel volume. This so-called Fresnel volume migration approach enhances image quality significantly compared with standard Kirchhoff PSDM because of the inherent focusing and the restriction of the back-propagation to the region around the actual reflection point.

[1]  Samuel H. Gray,et al.  From the Hagedoorn imaging technique to Kirchhoff migration and inversion , 2001 .

[2]  Stefan Buske,et al.  FRESNEL-VOLUME MULTICOMPONENT MIGRATION , 2003 .

[3]  I. Cockshott Specular Beam Migration - a Low Cost 3-D Pre-stack Depth Migration , 2006 .

[4]  George A. McMechan,et al.  Parsimonious Kirchhoff Depth Migration , 1999 .

[5]  Leiv-J. Gelius,et al.  Fresnel aperture prestack depth migration , 2004 .

[6]  G. McMechan,et al.  Parsimonious 3D post‐stack Kirchhoff depth migration , 2005 .

[7]  P. Podvin,et al.  Finite difference computation of traveltimes in very contrasted velocity models: a massively parallel approach and its associated tools , 1991 .

[8]  B. Gelchinsky,et al.  Multifocusing homeomorphic imaging. Part 1. Basic concepts and formulas , 1999 .

[9]  Stefan Buske,et al.  Fresnel volume migration of multicomponent data , 2005 .

[10]  R. Stolt MIGRATION BY FOURIER TRANSFORM , 1978 .

[11]  Gerard T. Schuster,et al.  3D wavepath migration , 2003 .

[12]  J. Claerbout Toward a unified theory of reflector mapping , 1971 .

[13]  Samuel H. Gray,et al.  Gaussian beam migration of common-shot records , 2005 .

[14]  G. McMechan,et al.  Parsimonious migration of 3-C 3D VSP data , 2007 .

[15]  C. Chapman Generalized Ray Theory for an Inhomogeneous Medium , 1974 .

[16]  Y. Kravtsov,et al.  Geometrical optics of inhomogeneous media , 2019, Geometrical Optics of Weakly Anisotropic Media.

[17]  Samuel H. Gray,et al.  Prestack Gaussian-beam depth migration in anisotropic media , 2007 .

[18]  Imaging salt with turning seismic waves , 1992 .

[19]  H. Gebrande,et al.  Focusing in Prestack Isochrone Migration Using Instantaneous Slowness Information , 1999 .

[20]  Gerard T. Schuster,et al.  2-D wavepath migration , 2001 .

[21]  Thomas Bohlen,et al.  Paralel 3-D viscoelastic finite difference seismic modelling , 2002 .

[22]  William A. Schneider,et al.  INTEGRAL FORMULATION FOR MIGRATION IN TWO AND THREE DIMENSIONS , 1978 .

[23]  Sergey Fomel,et al.  Applications of plane-wave destruction filters , 2002 .

[24]  Vlastislav Cerveny,et al.  Fresnel volume ray tracing , 1992 .

[25]  Toru Takahashi Prestack migration using arrival angle information , 1995 .

[26]  Martin Tygel,et al.  3-D true‐amplitude finite‐offset migration , 1993 .