Efficient inhibition of bursts by bursts in the auditory system of crickets

In crickets, auditory information about ultrasound is carried bilaterally to the brain by the AN2 neurons. The ON1 neuron provides contralateral inhibitory input to AN2, thereby enhancing bilateral contrast between the left and right AN2s, an important cue for sound localization. We examine how the structures of the spike trains of these neurons affect this inhibitory interaction. As previously shown for AN2, ON1 responds to salient peaks in stimulus amplitude with bursts of spikes. Spike bursts, but not isolated spikes, reliably signal the occurrence of specific features of the stimulus. ON1 and AN2 burst at similar times relative to the amplitude envelope of the stimulus, and bursts are more tightly time-locked to stimulus feature than the isolated spikes. As a consequence, spikes that, in the absence of contralateral inhibition, would occur within AN2 bursts are more likely to be preceded by spikes in ON1 (mainly also in bursts) than are isolated AN2 spikes. This leads to a large decrease in the burst rate of the inhibited AN2. We conclude that the match in coding properties of ON1 and AN2 allows contralateral inhibition to be most efficient for those portions of the response that carry the behaviourally relevant information, i.e. for bursts.

[1]  R. Hoy,et al.  Initiation of behavior by single neurons: the role of behavioral context. , 1984, Science.

[2]  B. Grothe,et al.  New roles for synaptic inhibition in sound localization , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Henry J. Alitto,et al.  Distinct Properties of Stimulus-Evoked Bursts in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Fabrizio Gabbiani,et al.  Burst firing in sensory systems , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  D. Irvine,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the sensitivity of neurons in the lateral superior olive to interaural intensity differences. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Parallel Processing of Sensory Input by Bursts and Isolated Spikes , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Axel Michelsen,et al.  Tuned directionality in cricket ears , 1995, Nature.

[8]  Gerald S. Pollack,et al.  Neural Processing of Acoustic Signals , 1998 .

[9]  Philip H Smith,et al.  Coincidence Detection in the Auditory System 50 Years after Jeffress , 1998, Neuron.

[10]  J. Lisman Bursts as a unit of neural information: making unreliable synapses reliable , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  D. Oertel The role of timing in the brain stem auditory nuclei of vertebrates. , 1999, Annual review of physiology.

[12]  D. M. Green,et al.  Sound localization by human listeners. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  Ronald R. Hoy,et al.  Comparative Hearing: Insects , 1998, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[14]  Nicholas J. Strausfeld,et al.  Lucifer Yellow Histology , 1983 .

[15]  Gary Marsat,et al.  A Behavioral Role for Feature Detection by Sensory Bursts , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  N. Lesica,et al.  Encoding of Natural Scene Movies by Tonic and Burst Spikes in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  S. Sherman,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of neurons in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus during tonic and burst response mode , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[18]  F Gabbiani,et al.  Feature Extraction by Burst-Like Spike Patterns in Multiple Sensory Maps , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  P. Brodfuehrer,et al.  The neuroethology of acoustic startle and escape in flying insects. , 1989, The Journal of experimental biology.

[20]  B. Grothe,et al.  Neural Delays Shape Selectivity to Interaural Intensity Differences in the Lateral Superior Olive , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  G. Pollack,et al.  Effect of the Temporal Pattern of Contralateral Inhibition on Sound Localization Cues , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  A. Selverston,et al.  Synaptic connectivity between cricket auditory interneurons as studied by selective photoinactivation , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  F. Huber,et al.  Sound localisation in crickets , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[24]  T. Park,et al.  Interaural Intensity Difference Processing in Auditory Midbrain Neurons: Effects of a Transient Early Inhibitory Input , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  B. Grothe,et al.  Precise inhibition is essential for microsecond interaural time difference coding , 2002, Nature.

[26]  Effects of inhibitory timing on contrast enhancement in auditory circuits in crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus). , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  C E Carr,et al.  Processing of temporal information in the brain. , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.