Rethinking the four dimensions of power: domination and empowerment

In the literature, there have been two essentially contrasting views of power: one of power as domination, largely characterized as power over, and the other of power as empowerment, frequently theorized as power to. To date, the four (Lukes and Foucault) dimensions of power have been considered forms of domination. In this article it is argued that the processes of four-dimensional power also constitute the process of normatively desirable power, as emancipation. Key is the realization that structured power over has the potential to be positive-sum, rather than zero-sum; furthermore, that the exclusions of two-dimensional power also constitute the conditions of possibility for justice. The fact that normatively desirable power and domination are constituted through the same processes is not chance: the effectiveness of power as domination is parasitic upon power as emancipation.

[1]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Frameworks of power , 1989 .

[2]  Nicola Walker,et al.  The Civilizing Process , 2021, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[3]  John Rawls,et al.  政治自由主义 = Political liberalism , 2000 .

[4]  M. Engelmann.  The Philosophical Investigations , 2013 .

[5]  Rondo Cameron,et al.  Plough, Sword, and Book: The Structure of Human History. By Ernest Gellner. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Pp. 288. $24.95 , 1989 .

[6]  Arend Lijphart,et al.  Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration , 1979 .

[7]  A. T. Parsons,et al.  On the Concept of Political Power , 2008 .

[8]  M. Haugaard.  Power: A ‘family resemblance’ concept , 2010 .

[9]  G. M. Gallarotti,et al.  Smart Power: what it is, why it’s important, and the conditions for its effective use , 2013 .

[10]  Bruce Hunter,et al.  Power: A Philosophical Analysis , 1991 .

[11]  M. Haugaard.  Reflections on Seven Ways of Creating Power , 2003 .

[12]  C. Wright Mills,et al.  Power Elite , 1956, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[13]  P. Morriss.  Steven Lukes on the Concept of Power , 2006 .

[14]  Creston Davis,et al.  The Constitution of Power , 2009 .

[15]  S. Lukes,et al.  Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: A dialogue , 2008 .

[16]  M. Weber.  From Max Weber: Essays in sociology , 1946 .

[17]  E. Shils.  The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[18]  Joseph S. Nye,et al.  Power and foreign policy , 2011 .

[19]  L. Lunsky.  Childhood and Society. , 1965 .

[20]  E. Erikson.  Childhood and Society , 1965 .

[21]  Jules Townshend,et al.  Power, A Radical View , 2007 .

[22]  R. Dahl.  The concept of power , 2007 .

[23]  C. Coglianese.  Democracy and Its Critics , 1990 .

[24]  C. Mills,et al.  Power Elite , 1956, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[25]  Gerhard Göhler,et al.  ‘Power to’ and ‘Power over’ , 2009 .

[26]  T. G.,et al.  Logic in Practice , 1934, Nature.

[27]  James Tansey,et al.  The Constitution of Power: Review of Mark Haugaard, Manchester University Press, 1997, pp. 234, ISBN 0-7190-3851-0 (Hardback) , 1998 .

[28]  E. Gellner.  Nations and Nationalism , 1983 .

[29]  H. Morgenthau.  The Concept of the Political , 2012 .

[30]  Alan Chong,et al.  Soft Power in Foreign Policy , 2007 .

[31]  Jane J. Mansbridge.  Using Power/Fighting Power* , 1994 .

[32]  M. Foucault.  The Subject and Power , 1982, Critical Inquiry.

[33]  Nancy Fraser.  Michel Foucault: A "Young Conservative"? , 1985, Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy.

[34]  M. Mann.  The sources of social power , 2012 .

[35]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[36]  Jean Anderson.  Power of knowledge. , 2006, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[37]  Leon J. Goldstein.  The End of History and the Last Man , 1993 .

[38]  A. Allen.  The power of feminist theory , 1998 .

[39]  Csr Young,et al.  How to Do Things With Words , 2009 .

[40]  J. Rawls,et al.  A Theory of Justice , 1971, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[41]  O. Sigurdson.  Political Theology , 2013 .

[42]  D. A. Thomas,et al.  Liberalism and the Limits of Justice , 1983 .

[43]  P. Bachrach,et al.  Two Faces of Power , 1962, American Political Science Review.

[44]  S. Hewa.  Medical technology: A pandora's box? , 1994, The Journal of medical humanities.

[45]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[46]  F. C. P. Motta.  The theory of communicative action , 1991 .

[47]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[48]  A. Schutz.  The phenomenology of the social world , 1967 .

[49]  David Beetham,et al.  The Legitimation of Power , 1991 .

[50]  B. Barnes.  The nature of power , 1988 .

[51]  C. Mouffe.  The Democratic Paradox , 2000 .

[52]  Keith Dowding,et al.  Power: A Philosophical Analysis, 2nd edition , 2003 .

[53]  Alan D. Schrift,et al.  Discipline and Punish , 2013 .

[54]  M. Mann.  The sources of social power, Vol. 1 , 2013 .

[55]  P. Digeser.  The Fourth Face of Power , 1992, The Journal of Politics.

[56]  Dennis Hume Wrong.  Power: Its Forms, Bases and Uses , 1979 .

[57]  M. Dean,et al.  Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society , 1999 .

[58]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[59]  Norbert Elias,et al.  The Civilizing Process , 1939 .

[60]  Re-structuring Power , 2010, Polity.

[61]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[62]  Navin Kumar Singh,et al.  The Future of Power , 2012 .

[63]  Michel Foucault,et al.  The Order of Things , 2010 .

[64]  Hanna Fenichel Pitkin,et al.  WITTGENSTEIN AND JUSTICE , 1973, Wittgenstein and the Social Sciences.

[65]  J. Habermas,et al.  The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[66]  TopperKeith.  De-Facing Power , 2014 .