Projection matrix optimization for block-sparse compressive sensing

Traditionally, the projection matrix in compressive sensing (CS) is chosen as a random matrix. In recent years, we have seen that the performance of CS systems can be improved by using a carefully designed projection matrix rather than a random one. In particular, we can reduce the coherence between the columns of the equivalent dictionary thanks to a well-designed projection matrix. Then, we can get a lower reconstruction error and a higher successful reconstruction rate. In some applications, the signals of interest have nonzero entries occurring in clusters - i.e., block-sparse signals. In this paper, we use the equiangular tight frame (ETF) to approach the Gram matrix of equivalent dictionary rather than the identity matrix used in [1]. Then, we minimize a weighted sum of the subblock coherence and the interblock coherence of the equivalent dictionary. The simulation results show that our novel method for projection matrix optimization significantly improves the ability of block-sparse approximation techniques to reconstruct and classify signals than the method proposed by Lihi Zelnik-Manor (LZM) [1].

[1]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Blind Multiband Signal Reconstruction: Compressed Sensing for Analog Signals , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Sensing Matrix Optimization for Block-Sparse Decoding , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[4]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Robust Recovery of Signals From a Structured Union of Subspaces , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Mike E. Davies,et al.  Parametric Dictionary Design for Sparse Coding , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Learning to Sense Sparse Signals: Simultaneous Sensing Matrix and Sparsifying Dictionary Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Thomas Strohmer,et al.  GRASSMANNIAN FRAMES WITH APPLICATIONS TO CODING AND COMMUNICATION , 2003, math/0301135.

[8]  Babak Hassibi,et al.  Recovering Sparse Signals Using Sparse Measurement Matrices in Compressed DNA Microarrays , 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[9]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Block-Sparse Signals: Uncertainty Relations and Efficient Recovery , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.