Understanding the risk factors of BIM technology implementation in the construction industry: an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach

The purpose of this paper is to identify risk factors in building information modeling (BIM) technology application, analyze the correlation between risk factors, and find the most influential risk factors using interpretative structural model (ISM), put forward a response to targeted suggestions, and provide a reference for widespread BIM technology application.,Literature reviews, ISM, a questionnaire survey and expert interviews were used in this paper. First, the risk factors of BIM technology application and their relationships were determined by consulting the relevant BIM literature. Second, to more intuitively reflect the relationships between risk factors, an ISM model based on expert interviews was established to structure the explanatory relationships and hierarchical relationships between factors. Finally, a questionnaire survey was conducted for relevant practitioners, and a scale was designed to evaluate the risk factors of BIM technology application to determine the risk factors that have a greater impact on implementing BIM technology.,The root risk factors of BIM technology consist of unclear data ownership, incomplete standard BIM systems, lack of industry insurance, lack of BIM technicians, lack of BIM project practice experience, BIM infrastructure preparation, inconsistent thinking about BIM from project participants, changes in delivery mode and software function problems.,The risk-sharing of BIM technology and the analysis of responsibilities, rights and benefits of all parties in a BIM project can be used as future research directions to solve higher management problems.,This paper describes the risks of BIM technology application for related researchers and provides another research train of thought for the follow-up studies.

[1]  Wei Zhang,et al.  The hindrance to using prefabrication in Hong Kong's building industry , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[2]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors , 2008 .

[3]  B. Hwang,et al.  Key constraints and mitigation strategies for prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction , 2018 .

[4]  Xianbo Zhao,et al.  Modelling paths of risks associated with BIM implementation in architectural, engineering and construction projects , 2017 .

[5]  Ruoyu Jin,et al.  Investigation of BIM Investment, Returns, and Risks in China's AEC Industries , 2017 .

[6]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Developing Subsystem Matrices in Structural Modeling , 1974, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  B. B. Das,et al.  Ultra High Performance Concrete-Sustainable Solution for the Next Generation Infrastructure , 2017 .

[8]  Margaret K.Y. Mok,et al.  Schedule risks in prefabrication housing production in Hong Kong: a social network analysis , 2016 .

[9]  Jian Zuo,et al.  Key factors for the BIM adoption by architects: a China study , 2015 .

[10]  John Tookey,et al.  Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges , 2017 .

[11]  Safeer Abbas,et al.  Ultra-High Performance Concrete: Mechanical Performance, Durability, Sustainability and Implementation Challenges , 2016, International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials.

[12]  Nan Li,et al.  Application Areas and Data Requirements for BIM-Enabled Facilities Management , 2012 .

[13]  Sandeep Langar,et al.  Building Information Modeling (BIM) outsourcing among general contractors , 2018, Automation in Construction.

[14]  Salman Azhar,et al.  Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry , 2011 .

[15]  M. Skibniewski,et al.  A literature review of the factors limiting the application of BIM in the construction industry , 2015 .

[16]  Longhui Liao,et al.  Critical Success Factors for enhancing the Building Information Modelling implementation in building projects in Singapore , 2017 .

[17]  Kirti Ruikar,et al.  BIM application to building energy performance visualisation and management: Challenges and potential , 2017 .

[18]  Bimal Kumar,et al.  BIM Capability Audit of Contracting-Based Organisations , 2016, Int. J. 3 D Inf. Model..

[19]  Yujie Lu,et al.  Building Information Modeling (BIM) for green buildings: A critical review and future directions , 2017 .

[20]  Robert Eadie,et al.  BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: An analysis , 2013 .

[21]  Salman Azhar,et al.  Building information modelling (BIM): now and beyond , 2012 .

[22]  Shang-Hsien Hsieh,et al.  Empirical Approach to Identify Operational Critical Success Factors for BIM Projects , 2019, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.

[23]  Zong-Han Wu,et al.  Identifying and assessing critical risk factors for BIM projects: Empirical study , 2014 .

[24]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: An Indian perspective , 2011 .

[25]  Bon-Gang Hwang,et al.  Integrated Digital Delivery: Implementation status and project performance in the Singapore construction industry , 2020 .

[26]  J. Swan,et al.  Embedding New Management Knowledge in Project-Based Organizations , 2004 .

[27]  Sushil Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model , 2012, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.

[28]  Darius Migilinskas,et al.  The Benefits, Obstacles and Problems of Practical Bim Implementation , 2013 .

[29]  Marcel Hertogh,et al.  Understanding effects of BIM on collaborative design and construction: An empirical study in China , 2017 .

[30]  Bimal Kumar,et al.  Implementation of level 2 Building Information Modelling strategy for asset procurement , 2017 .

[31]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  The Mechanism and Challenges of Validating a Building Information Model regarding data exchange standards , 2019, Automation in Construction.

[32]  Yulong Li,et al.  Developing interpretive structural modeling based on factor analysis for the water-energy-food nexus conundrum. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  Vishal Singh,et al.  Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Facilities Management - Literature Review and Future Needs , 2014, PLM.