Compatibility and Investment in the U . S . Electric Vehicle Market

Competing standards often proliferate in the early years of product markets, potentially leading to socially inefficient investment. This paper studies the effect of compatibility in the U.S. electric vehicle market, which has grown ten-fold in its first five years but has three incompatible standards for charging stations. I develop and estimate a structural model of consumer vehicle choice and car manufacturer investment that demonstrates the ambiguous impact of mandating compatibility standards on market outcomes and welfare. Compatibility may benefit consumers by providing access to all existing charging stations. However, firms may cut back on their investments because the benefits from one firm’s investments spill over to rivals. Firm response in investment may erode consumer gains from compatibility. I estimate my model using U.S. data from 2011 to 2015 on vehicle registrations and charging station investment and identify demand elasticities with variation in federal and state subsidy policies. Counterfactual simulations show that mandating compatibility in charging standards would decrease duplicative investment in charging stations by car manufacturers and increase the size of the electric vehicle market. ∗I am deeply grateful to my PhD advisors Ariel Pakes, Elie Tamer, Robin Lee, James Stock, and Christopher Knittel for their continual guidance and support. I thank Evan Herrnstadt, Gaston Illanes, Divya Kirti, Shanjun Li, Daniel Pollmann, Frank Schilbach, Robert Stavins, Che-Lin Su, Richard Sweeney, Thomas Wollmann, Matthew Zaragoza-Watkins, Yufei Zhao, Fanyin Zheng and participants in the Harvard Industrial Organization, Labor/PF, and Environmental workshop and lunches for helpful conversations, comments, and suggestions. Data purchased for this research is generously supported by the Lab for Economic Applications and Policy. I thank John Smart and Sera White at the Idaho National Laboratory for generously sharing knowledge of the U.S. federal programs that deployed electric vehicle charging infrastructure. †MIT Sloan School of Management, lijing@mit.edu

[1]  D. Steinberg,et al.  Providing the Spark: Impact of financial incentives on battery electric vehicle adoption , 2019, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.

[2]  Thomas G. Wollmann Trucks without Bailouts: Equilibrium Product Characteristics for Commercial Vehicles , 2018, American Economic Review.

[3]  S. Borenstein,et al.  Designing policy incentives for cleaner technologies: Lessons from California's plug-in electric vehicle rebate program , 2017 .

[4]  Nicholas Z. Muller,et al.  Are There Environmental Benefits from Driving Electric Vehicles? The Importance of Local Factors , 2016 .

[5]  Kevin R. Williams,et al.  Product Variety, Across-Market Demand Heterogeneity, and the Value of Online Retail , 2016, The RAND Journal of Economics.

[6]  Nicholas Z. Muller,et al.  Distributional Effects of Air Pollution from Electric Vehicle Adoption , 2016, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.

[7]  M. Greaker,et al.  Network effects and environmental externalities: Do clean technologies suffer from excess inertia? , 2016 .

[8]  D. Gross The Ties that Bind: Railroad Gauge Standards and Internal Trade in the 19th Century U.S. , 2016 .

[9]  Lang Tong,et al.  The Market for Electric Vehicles: Indirect Network Effects and Policy Design , 2016, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.

[10]  Ali Hortaçsu,et al.  Semiparametric Estimation of a CES Demand System with Observed and Unobserved Product Characteristics , 2015, 1511.05600.

[11]  Giulia Pavan Green Cars Adoption and the Supply of Alternative Fuels , 2015 .

[12]  Gregory S. Crawford,et al.  The Welfare Effects of Endogenous Quality Choice in Cable Television Markets , 2015 .

[13]  D. Acemoglu,et al.  Transition to Clean Technology , 2014, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  A. Skonhoft,et al.  The Norwegian support and subsidy policy of electric cars. Should it be adopted by other countries , 2014 .

[15]  Robin S. Lee Vertical Integration and Exclusivity in Platform and Two-Sided Markets , 2013 .

[16]  Ying Fan Ownership Consolidation and Product Characteristics: A Study of the US Daily Newspaper Market , 2013 .

[17]  Christopher R. Knittel,et al.  Keeping it Fresh: Strategic Product Redesigns and Welfare , 2013 .

[18]  Xiaoxia Shi,et al.  Estimating demand for differentiated products with error in market shares , 2013 .

[19]  P. Aghion,et al.  Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry , 2012, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity of Marginal Emissions: Implications for Electric Cars and Other Electricity-Shifting Policies , 2012 .

[21]  Timothy Simcoe,et al.  Four Paths to Compatibility , 2012 .

[22]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Andrew Sweeting,et al.  Dynamic Product Positioning in Differentiated Product Markets: The Effect of Fees for Musical Performance Rights on the Commercial Radio Industry , 2011 .

[24]  J. Sallee The Surprising Incidence of Tax Credits for the Toyota Prius , 2011 .

[25]  Alon Eizenberg Upstream Innovation and Product Variety in the U.S. Home PC Market , 2011 .

[26]  Michaela Draganska,et al.  Beyond plain vanilla: Modeling joint product assortment and pricing decisions , 2008 .

[27]  Tom-Reiel Heggedal,et al.  Lock-In and the Transition to Hydrogen Cars: Should Governments Intervene? , 2007 .

[28]  Marc Rysman,et al.  Dynamics of Consumer Demand for New Durable Goods , 2007, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  Christopher R. Knittel,et al.  Strategic Incompatibility in ATM Markets , 2006 .

[30]  Kate Ho,et al.  The Welfare Effects of Restricted Hospital Choice in the Us Medical Care Market , 2005 .

[31]  A. Jaffe,et al.  A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy , 2005 .

[32]  Christopher R. Knittel,et al.  Incompatibility, Product Attributes and Consumer Welfare: Evidence from ATMs , 2004 .

[33]  Marc Rysman,et al.  Unobserved Product Differentiation in Discrete Choice Models: Estimating Price Elasticities and Welfare Effects , 2002 .

[34]  Amil Petrin Quantifying the Benefits of New Products: The Case of the Minivan , 2001, Journal of Political Economy.

[35]  Steven Berry,et al.  Limit Theorems for Estimating the Parameters of Differentiated Product Demand Systems , 2000 .

[36]  Kenneth A. Reinert,et al.  The Distributional Effects of U.S. Textile and Apparel Protection , 1997 .

[37]  Steven T. Berry Estimating Discrete-Choice Models of Product Differentiation , 1994 .

[38]  Michael L. Katz,et al.  Product Compatibility Choice in a Market with Technological Progress , 1986 .

[39]  K. Small,et al.  Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models , 1979 .

[40]  H. Williams On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit , 1977 .

[41]  Christopher R. Knittel Reducing Petroleum Consumption from Transportation , 2012 .

[42]  Chris Nosko Competition and Quality Choice in the CPU Market ∗ , 2011 .

[43]  Joy L. Ishii Compatibility , Competition , and Investment in Network Industries : ATM Networks in the Banking Industry , 2005 .

[44]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[45]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .