Treatment switching in oncology trials and the acceptability of adjustment methods

Treatment switching has become an important issue in the development and approval of new drugs, particularly in oncology. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represent the gold standard for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions, but often patients randomized to the control group are permitted to switch onto the experimental treatment at some point during the trial. This is important, because standard statistical approaches used to analyze RCTs compare groups as randomized, based upon an intention-to-treat principle. When patients in both groups receive the new drug, such analyses do not provide an accurate estimate of the comparative effectiveness of the two treatments. This may lead to inappropriate decision-making – cost-effective drugs may not be approved. Limited healthcare finances may be used inefficiently. Health-related quality-of-life and lives may be lost.

[1]  M. Drummond,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness Research/Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Analyzing Overall Survival in Randomized Controlled Trials with Crossover and Implications for Economic Evaluation , 2014 .

[2]  Keith R Abrams,et al.  Adjusting Survival Time Estimates to Account for Treatment Switching in Randomized Controlled Trials—an Economic Evaluation Context , 2014, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  Ian R. White,et al.  Randomization-based methods for correcting for treatment changes: examples from the Concorde trial. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  István Láng,et al.  Analyses adjusting for selective crossover show improved overall survival with adjuvant letrozole compared with tamoxifen in the BIG 1-98 study. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  G. Morgan,et al.  Overall survival of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients after adjusting for crossover in the MM‐003 trial for pomalidomide plus low‐dose dexamethasone , 2015, British journal of haematology.

[6]  Keith R. Abrams,et al.  Adjusting Survival Time Estimates in the Presence of Treatment Switching , 2014 .

[7]  J. Robins,et al.  Correcting for Noncompliance and Dependent Censoring in an AIDS Clinical Trial with Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighted (IPCW) Log‐Rank Tests , 2000, Biometrics.

[8]  J. Robins,et al.  Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using rank preserving structural failure time models , 1991 .

[9]  Xin Huang,et al.  Adjusting overall survival for treatment switches: commonly used methods and practical application , 2013, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[10]  R. Motzer,et al.  Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[11]  K. Abrams,et al.  Assessing methods for dealing with treatment switching in randomised controlled trials: a simulation study , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[12]  S. Faivre,et al.  Methods for Adjusting for Bias Due to Crossover in Oncology Trials , 2014, PharmacoEconomics.

[13]  Christiane,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2004, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.

[14]  M. Branson,et al.  Correcting Overall Survival for the Impact of Crossover Via a Rank-Preserving Structural Failure Time (RPSFT) Model in the RECORD-1 Trial of Everolimus in Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma , 2012, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[15]  World Medical Association (WMA),et al.  Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects , 2009, Journal of the Indian Medical Association.

[16]  Mark Sculpher,et al.  REPORT BY THE DECISION SUPPORT UNIT , 2010 .

[17]  P C Lambert,et al.  Adjusting for treatment switching in randomised controlled trials – A simulation study and a simplified two-stage method , 2017, Statistical methods in medical research.

[18]  David Goldstein,et al.  Complete Longitudinal Analyses of the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial of Sunitinib in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor following Imatinib Failure , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.