Rough sets to help medical diagnosis - Evidence from a Taiwan's clinic

Medical data usually contain high degree of uncertainty that leads to problems such as diagnosis disparity. With the continually rising expenditures of health care, controlling the level of the expenditures by improving the diagnosis process is an emergent task and poses a greater challenge. Rough sets have been shown to be a useful technique to deal with data with uncertainty. This paper applies rough sets to identify the set of significant symptoms causing diseases and to induce decision rules using the data of a Taiwan's otolaryngology clinic. The data are limited to rhinology and throat logy and contain 657 records with each record including 12 condition attributes and one decision attribute. The clinic's physician agrees with the set of significant symptoms identified and favors the reduct containing one critical symptom. To generate decision rules, we use LEM2 and Explore algorithms and discuss these rules in terms of numbers of rules and implications of certain rules. Our results show that LEM2 generates fewer numbers of certain rules and LEM2's proportions of approximate rules are higher. We also observe that LEM2's certain rules form a more sensible pattern that Explore lacks. Discovery of the pattern is considered to be potentially helpful in improving the medical diagnosis.

[1]  Jerzy Stefanowski,et al.  Application of Rule Induction and Rough Sets to Verification of Magnetic Resonance Diagnosis , 2002, Fundam. Informaticae.

[2]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  LERS-A System for Learning from Examples Based on Rough Sets , 1992, Intelligent Decision Support.

[3]  Roman Słowiński,et al.  Intelligent Decision Support , 1992, Theory and Decision Library.

[4]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence , 1999 .

[5]  Z. Pawlak Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data , 1991 .

[6]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough Sets: A Tutorial , 1998 .

[7]  T. K. Das,et al.  LEAD: a methodology for learning efficient approaches to medical diagnosis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[8]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough-Fuzzy Hybridization: A New Trend in Decision Making , 1999 .

[9]  Xiangyang Wang,et al.  Rough set feature selection and rule induction for prediction of malignancy degree in brain glioma , 2006, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[10]  Shusaku Tsumoto,et al.  Foundations of Intelligent Systems, 15th International Symposium, ISMIS 2005, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA, May 25-28, 2005, Proceedings , 2005, ISMIS.

[11]  Szymon Wilk,et al.  Rough Set Based Data Exploration Using ROSE System , 1999, ISMIS.

[12]  Daniel Vanderpooten,et al.  Induction of decision rules in classification and discovery-oriented perspectives , 2001, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[13]  Jerzy Stefanowski,et al.  Rough Set Theory and Decision Rules in Data Analysis of Breast Cancer Patients , 2004, Trans. Rough Sets.

[14]  Z. Bo Variable precision rough sets model based on(α,τ) limited similarity relation , 2009 .

[15]  Wojtek Michalowski,et al.  Supporting triage of children with abdominal pain in the emergency room , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Wojciech Ziarko,et al.  Variable Precision Rough Set Model , 1993, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[17]  Alicja Wakulicz-Deja,et al.  Rough Sets Approach to Medical Diagnosis System , 2005, AWIC.

[18]  Zdzislaw Pawlak,et al.  Some Issues on Rough Sets , 2004, Trans. Rough Sets.