The Resource Identification Initiative: A cultural shift in publishing

A central tenet in support of research reproducibility is the ability to uniquely identify research resources, i.e., reagents, tools, and materials that are used to perform experiments. However, current reporting practices for research resources are insufficient to allow humans and algorithms to identify the exact resources that are reported or answer basic questions such as “What other studies used resource X?” To address this issue, the Resource Identification Initiative was launched as a pilot project to improve the reporting standards for research resources in the methods sections of papers and thereby improve identifiability and reproducibility. The pilot engaged over 25 biomedical journal editors from most major publishers, as well as scientists and funding officials. Authors were asked to include Research Resource Identifiers (RRIDs) in their manuscripts prior to publication for three resource types: antibodies, model organisms, and tools (including software and databases). RRIDs represent accession numbers assigned by an authoritative database, e.g., the model organism databases, for each type of resource. To make it easier for authors to obtain RRIDs, resources were aggregated from the appropriate databases and their RRIDs made available in a central web portal ( ). RRIDs meet three key criteria: they are www.scicrunch.org/resources machine readable, free to generate and access, and are consistent across publishers and journals. The pilot was launched in February of 2014 and 1 2 1 2

[1]  Jean-Michel Hupé,et al.  Statistical inferences under the Null hypothesis: common mistakes and pitfalls in neuroimaging studies , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[2]  Amanda Capes-Davis,et al.  Cell line cross-contamination: WSU-CLL is a known derivative of REH and is unsuitable as a model for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. , 2014, Leukemia research.

[3]  Perry L. Miller,et al.  Extending the NIF DISCO framework to automate complex workflow: coordinating the harvest and integration of data from diverse neuroscience information resources , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[4]  Nicole A. Vasilevsky,et al.  On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature , 2013, PeerJ.

[5]  Ron Mengelers,et al.  The Effects of FreeSurfer Version, Workstation Type, and Macintosh Operating System Version on Anatomical Volume and Cortical Thickness Measurements , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Christian Kaltschmidt,et al.  An Investigation of the Specificity of Research Antibodies against NF-κB-subunit p65 , 2014, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[7]  Anita Bandrowski,et al.  Promoting research resource identification at JCN , 2014, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  D. Daniels,et al.  Enhanced consumption of salient solutions following pedunculopontine tegmental lesions , 2015, Neuroscience.

[9]  Priyanka Rathore,et al.  Cautionary notes on the use of NF-κB p65 and p50 antibodies for CNS studies , 2011, Journal of Neuroinflammation.

[10]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Maryann E. Martone,et al.  A Comparative Antibody Analysis of Pannexin1 Expression in Four Rat Brain Regions Reveals Varying Subcellular Localizations , 2012, Front. Pharmacol..

[12]  M. Herkenham,et al.  Minimal NF-κB activity in neurons , 2013, Neuroscience.

[13]  Hans-Michael Müller,et al.  The Neuroscience Information Framework: A Data and Knowledge Environment for Neuroscience , 2008, Neuroinformatics.

[14]  R. Fluck,et al.  Treatment needs and diagnosis awareness in primary care patients with chronic kidney disease. , 2012, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.