Optimization Under Uncertainty for Wake Steering Strategies

Wind turbines in a wind power plant experience significant power losses because of aerodynamic interactions between turbines. One control strategy to reduce these losses is known as “wake steering,” in which upstream turbines are yawed to direct wakes away from downstream turbines. Previous wake steering research has assumed perfect information, however, there can be significant uncertainty in many aspects of the problem, including wind inflow and various turbine measurements. Uncertainty has significant implications for performance of wake steering strategies. Consequently, the authors formulate and solve an optimization under uncertainty (OUU) problem for finding optimal wake steering strategies in the presence of yaw angle uncertainty. The OUU wake steering strategy is demonstrated on a two-turbine test case and on the utility-scale, offshore Princess Amalia Wind Farm. When we accounted for yaw angle uncertainty in the Princess Amalia Wind Farm case, inflow-direction-specific OUU solutions produced between 0% and 1.4% more power than the deterministically optimized steering strategies, resulting in an overall annual average improvement of 0.2%. More importantly, the deterministic optimization is expected to perform worse and with more downside risk than the OUU result when realistic uncertainty is taken into account. Additionally, the OUU solution produces fewer extreme yaw situations than the deterministic solution.

[1]  E. Migoya,et al.  Application of a LES technique to characterize the wake deflection of a wind turbine in yaw , 2009 .

[2]  J. Højstrup,et al.  A Simple Model for Cluster Efficiency , 1987 .

[3]  Nikolaos V. Sahinidis,et al.  Optimization under uncertainty: state-of-the-art and opportunities , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[4]  Manuel Burgos Payán,et al.  Optimization of Wind Farm Turbine Layout Including Decision Making Under Risk , 2012, IEEE Systems Journal.

[5]  Michael S. Eldred,et al.  DAKOTA : a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis. Version 5.0, user's reference manual. , 2010 .

[6]  Peter Graf,et al.  Optimization Under Uncertainty of Site-Specific Turbine Configurations , 2016 .

[7]  Jason R. Marden,et al.  Wind plant power optimization through yaw control using a parametric model for wake effects—a CFD simulation study , 2016 .

[8]  John R. Birge,et al.  Introduction to Stochastic Programming , 1997 .

[9]  Sophia Lefantzi,et al.  DAKOTA : a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis. , 2011 .

[10]  Jason R. Marden,et al.  A Model-Free Approach to Wind Farm Control Using Game Theoretic Methods , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[11]  Kathryn E. Johnson,et al.  Wind farm control: Addressing the aerodynamic interaction among wind turbines , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[12]  Po-Wen Cheng,et al.  Wake redirecting using feedback control to improve the power output of wind farms , 2016, 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

[13]  Andreas Bechmann,et al.  Evaluation of the wind direction uncertainty and its impact on wake modeling at the Horns Rev offshore wind farm , 2014 .

[14]  Bossanyi Ervin,et al.  Optimisation of wind plant sector management for energy and loads , 2016 .

[15]  Andrew Ning,et al.  Wind plant system engineering through optimization of layout and yaw control , 2016 .

[16]  M. Powell A Direct Search Optimization Method That Models the Objective and Constraint Functions by Linear Interpolation , 1994 .