Accuracy of direct genomic values for functional traits in Brown Swiss cattle.

In this study, direct genomic values for the functional traits general temperament, milking temperament, aggressiveness, rank order in herd, milking speed, udder depth, position of labia, and days to first heat in Brown Swiss dairy cattle were estimated based on ~777,000 (777 K) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) information from 1,126 animals. Accuracy of direct genomic values was assessed by a 5-fold cross-validation with 10 replicates. Correlations between deregressed proofs and direct genomic values were 0.63 for general temperament, 0.73 for milking temperament, 0.69 for aggressiveness, 0.65 for rank order in herd, 0.69 for milking speed, 0.71 for udder depth, 0.66 for position of labia, and 0.74 for days to first heat. Using the information of ~54,000 (54K) SNP led to only marginal deviations in the observed accuracy. Trying to predict the 20% youngest bulls led to correlations of 0.55, 0.77, 0.73, 0.55, 0.64, 0.59, 0.67, and 0.77, respectively, for the traits listed above. Using a novel method to estimate the accuracy of a direct genomic value (defined as correlation between direct genomic value and true breeding value and accounting for the correlation between direct genomic values and conventional breeding values) revealed accuracies of 0.37, 0.20, 0.19, 0.27, 0.48, 0.45, 0.36, and 0.12, respectively, for the traits listed above. These values are much smaller but probably also more realistic than accuracies based on correlations, given the heritabilities and samples sizes in this study. Annotation of the largest estimated SNP effects revealed 2 candidate genes affecting the traits general temperament and days to first heat.

[1]  H. Simianer,et al.  Estimation of genetic parameters for novel functional traits in Brown Swiss cattle. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  K. Wimmers,et al.  Genomic selection using low density marker panels with application to a sire line in pigs , 2013, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[3]  H. Simianer,et al.  Accuracy of 54K to HD gebotype imputation in Brown Swiss cattle , 2013 .

[4]  Jiazhong Guo,et al.  A genome-wide association study using international breeding-evaluation data identifies major loci affecting production traits and stature in the Brown Swiss cattle breed , 2012, BMC Genetics.

[5]  G. Thaller,et al.  Reliability of genomic prediction for German Holsteins using imputed genotypes from low-density chips. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  P. Ma,et al.  Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  M Erbe,et al.  Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  Daniel Gianola,et al.  Using Whole-Genome Sequence Data to Predict Quantitative Trait Phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[9]  W. Liao,et al.  Features of the retinal environment which affect the activities and product profile of cholesterol-metabolizing cytochromes P450 CYP27A1 and CYP11A1. , 2012, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[10]  R. Fernando,et al.  Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[11]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  W. Schulze,et al.  Tachykinin (substance-P) gene expression in Leydig cells of the human and mouse testis. , 1991, Endocrinology.

[13]  P M VanRaden,et al.  Genomic imputation and evaluation using high-density Holstein genotypes. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  R. Fernando,et al.  Genetics Selection Evolution BioMed Central , 2009 .

[15]  Robin Thompson,et al.  ASREML user guide release 1.0 , 2002 .

[16]  P. Amer,et al.  Implications of avoiding overlap between training and testing data sets when evaluating genomic predictions of genetic merit. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.