Cockroaches traverse crevices, crawl rapidly in confined spaces, and inspire a soft, legged robot

Significance Cockroaches intrude everywhere by exploiting their soft-bodied, shape-changing ability. We discovered that cockroaches traversed horizontal crevices smaller than a quarter of their height in less than a second by compressing their bodies’ compliant exoskeletons in half. Once inside vertically confined spaces, cockroaches still locomoted rapidly at 20 body lengths per second using an unexplored mode of locomotion—body-friction legged crawling. Using materials tests, we found that the compressive forces cockroaches experience when traversing the smallest crevices were 300 times body weight. Cockroaches withstood forces nearly 900 times body weight without injury, explaining their robustness to compression. Cockroach exoskeletons provided inspiration for a soft, legged search-and-rescue robot that may penetrate rubble generated by tornados, earthquakes, or explosions. Jointed exoskeletons permit rapid appendage-driven locomotion but retain the soft-bodied, shape-changing ability to explore confined environments. We challenged cockroaches with horizontal crevices smaller than a quarter of their standing body height. Cockroaches rapidly traversed crevices in 300–800 ms by compressing their body 40–60%. High-speed videography revealed crevice negotiation to be a complex, discontinuous maneuver. After traversing horizontal crevices to enter a vertically confined space, cockroaches crawled at velocities approaching 60 cm⋅s−1, despite body compression and postural changes. Running velocity, stride length, and stride period only decreased at the smallest crevice height (4 mm), whereas slipping and the probability of zigzag paths increased. To explain confined-space running performance limits, we altered ceiling and ground friction. Increased ceiling friction decreased velocity by decreasing stride length and increasing slipping. Increased ground friction resulted in velocity and stride length attaining a maximum at intermediate friction levels. These data support a model of an unexplored mode of locomotion—“body-friction legged crawling” with body drag, friction-dominated leg thrust, but no media flow as in air, water, or sand. To define the limits of body compression in confined spaces, we conducted dynamic compressive cycle tests on living animals. Exoskeletal strength allowed cockroaches to withstand forces 300 times body weight when traversing the smallest crevices and up to nearly 900 times body weight without injury. Cockroach exoskeletons provided biological inspiration for the manufacture of an origami-style, soft, legged robot that can locomote rapidly in both open and confined spaces.

[1]  The elements of physics , 1896 .

[2]  F. Delcomyn The Locomotion of the Cockroach Periplaneta Americana , 1971 .

[3]  S. C. Smith,et al.  Burrows and burrowing behavior by mammals , 1990 .

[4]  R. Full,et al.  Energetics of ascent: insects on inclines. , 1990, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  R. Full,et al.  Mechanics of a rapid running insect: two-, four- and six-legged locomotion. , 1991, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  Full,et al.  Static forces and moments generated in the insect leg: comparison of a three-dimensional musculo-skeletal computer model with experimental measurements , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  Full,et al.  Maximum single leg force production: cockroaches righting on photoelastic gelatin , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  R. Wootton Invertebrate paraxial locomotory appendages: design, deformation and control. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  K. Quillin,et al.  Ontogenetic scaling of burrowing forces in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  R J Full,et al.  How animals move: an integrative view. , 2000, Science.

[11]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Biomechanics of the movable pretarsal adhesive organ in ants and bees , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Julian F. V. Vincent,et al.  Arthropod cuticle: A natural composite shell system , 2002 .

[13]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R. Full,et al.  An Integrative Study of Insect Adhesion: Mechanics and Wet Adhesion of Pretarsal Pads in Ants1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[15]  S. Gorb,et al.  Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  Alfred A. Rizzi,et al.  Legless locomotion for legged robots , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[17]  S. Gorb,et al.  From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  J. Vincent,et al.  Design and mechanical properties of insect cuticle. , 2004, Arthropod structure & development.

[19]  S. Zill,et al.  Effects of load inversion in cockroach walking , 1995, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  Peter A. Jumars,et al.  Burrowing mechanics: Burrow extension by crack propagation , 2005, Nature.

[21]  R. Full,et al.  Dynamics of rapid vertical climbing in cockroaches reveals a template , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[22]  M. Cutkosky,et al.  Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  R J Full,et al.  Distributed mechanical feedback in arthropods and robots simplifies control of rapid running on challenging terrain , 2007, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[24]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Microrobot Design Using Fiber Reinforced Composites , 2008 .

[25]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research , 2008 .

[26]  R J Full,et al.  Neuromechanical response of musculo-skeletal structures in cockroaches during rapid running on rough terrain , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[27]  R E Ritzmann,et al.  Characterization of obstacle negotiation behaviors in the cockroach, Blaberus discoidalis , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  Paolo Dario,et al.  A New Mechanism for Mesoscale Legged Locomotion in Compliant Tubular Environments , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[29]  Huai-Ti Lin,et al.  Soft-cuticle biomechanics: a constitutive model of anisotropy for caterpillar integument. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  Chen Li,et al.  Undulatory Swimming in Sand: Subsurface Locomotion of the Sandfish Lizard , 2009, Science.

[31]  M. Evans,et al.  Locomotion in the Coleoptera Adephaga, especially Carabidae , 2009 .

[32]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  DASH: A dynamic 16g hexapedal robot , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[33]  Ullrich Steiner,et al.  Friction ridges in cockroach climbing pads: anisotropy of shear stress measured on transparent, microstructured substrates , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[34]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Peristaltic locomotion with antagonistic actuators in soft robotics , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[35]  Chris H. Mullens,et al.  Insects running on elastic surfaces , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[36]  Samuel Burden,et al.  Bio-inspired design and dynamic maneuverability of a minimally actuated six-legged robot , 2010, 2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[37]  A. R. Biknevicius,et al.  A comparison of epigean and subterranean locomotion in the domestic ferret (Mustela putorius furo: Mustelidae: Carnivora). , 2010, Zoology.

[38]  Yang Ding,et al.  Undulatory swimming in sand: experimental and simulation studies of a robotic sandfish , 2011, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[39]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  B Mazzolai,et al.  An octopus-bioinspired solution to movement and manipulation for soft robots , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[41]  S. Nikolov,et al.  Chitin in the Exoskeletons of Arthropoda: From Ancient Design to Novel Materials Science , 2011 .

[42]  M. Bobbert Why is the force-velocity relationship in leg press tasks quasi-linear rather than hyperbolic? , 2012, Journal of applied physiology.

[43]  David Taylor,et al.  Fracture toughness of locust cuticle , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[44]  Chen Li,et al.  Multi-functional foot use during running in the zebra-tailed lizard (Callisaurus draconoides) , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[45]  Yang Ding,et al.  Mechanics of Undulatory Swimming in a Frictional Fluid , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[46]  Aaron M. Hoover,et al.  Rapid Inversion: Running Animals and Robots Swing like a Pendulum under Ledges , 2012, PloS one.

[47]  Daniel I. Goldman,et al.  Climbing, falling, and jamming during ant locomotion in confined environments , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Daniel I Goldman,et al.  Flipper-driven terrestrial locomotion of a sea turtle-inspired robot , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[49]  Chen Li,et al.  A Terradynamics of Legged Locomotion on Granular Media , 2013, Science.

[50]  Jusuk Lee,et al.  Locomotion- and mechanics-mediated tactile sensing: antenna reconfiguration simplifies control during high-speed navigation in cockroaches , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[51]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[52]  Takuya Umedachi,et al.  Highly deformable 3-D printed soft robot generating inching and crawling locomotions with variable friction legs , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[53]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A Resilient, Untethered Soft Robot , 2014 .

[54]  D S Dorsch,et al.  Razor clam to RoboClam: burrowing drag reduction mechanisms and their robotic adaptation , 2014, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[55]  D. Goldman,et al.  Sidewinding with minimal slip: Snake and robot ascent of sandy slopes , 2014, Science.

[56]  J. Triblehorn,et al.  Mechanical properties of the cuticles of three cockroach species that differ in their wind-evoked escape behavior , 2014, PeerJ.

[57]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Soft Robotics: New Perspectives for Robot Bodyware and Control , 2014, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[58]  Carmel Majidi,et al.  Energy efficiency in friction-based locomotion mechanisms for soft and hard robots: slower can be faster , 2014 .

[59]  B A Trimmer,et al.  Bone-free: soft mechanics for adaptive locomotion. , 2014, Integrative and comparative biology.

[60]  LipsonHod,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for Design, Simulation, and Fabrication of Soft Robots , 2014 .

[61]  Takuya Umedachi,et al.  Design of a 3D-printed soft robot with posture and steering control , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[62]  Duncan W. Haldane,et al.  Running beyond the bio-inspired regime , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[63]  K. Dorgan The biomechanics of burrowing and boring , 2015, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[64]  Chen Li,et al.  Terradynamically streamlined shapes in animals and robots enhance traversability through densely cluttered terrain , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[65]  R. Full,et al.  Principles of appendage design in robots and animals determining terradynamic performance on flowable ground , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[66]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[67]  D. Goldman,et al.  Beneath Our Feet: Strategies for Locomotion in Granular Media , 2015 .

[68]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion , 2015, Science.

[69]  Sarah S. Sharpe,et al.  Controlled preparation of wet granular media reveals limits to lizard burial ability , 2015, Physical biology.

[70]  Ute Dreher,et al.  The Locomotion Of Soft Bodied Animals , 2016 .

[71]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  SOFT ROBOTICS A 3 D-printed , functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion , 2022 .