Coping with ex-ante regulations for planting Bt maize: the Portuguese experience

This article investigates the attitude and practices of Bt and non-Bt maize farmers in Portugal. Thirty-seven Bt maize farmers were interviewed, representing 22.5% of the total number of Bt maize notifications in the country and 31.5% of the total area planted with Bt maize in 2007. Additionally, 66 non-Bt maize farmers were surveyed in an attempt to investigate their opinion on the Bt technology, its viability, and its future. The most interesting finding is that almost half of all the surveyed maize farmers stated that the ex-ante regulations are rigid and difficult to apply.

[1]  Emilio Rodríguez-Cerezo,et al.  Bt corn in Spain—the performance of the EU's first GM crop , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  Fangbin Qiao,et al.  Impact of Bt Cotton in China , 2001 .

[3]  Justus Wesseler,et al.  Biodiversity versus Transgenic Sugar Beet: The One Euro Question , 2004 .

[4]  R. McDonald,et al.  The Value of Waiting to Invest , 1982 .

[5]  Jon M. Conrad,et al.  Wilderness: Options to Preserve, Extract or Develop , 2000 .

[6]  G. Frisvold,et al.  Genetic improvements in major US crops: the size and distribution of benefits , 2003 .

[7]  Kyrre Rickertsen,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Vegetable Oil and Salmon: A Multiple-Country Assessment , 2003 .

[8]  J. Wesseler,et al.  A Critical Assessment of Methods for Analysis of Social Welfare Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops: a Literature Survey , 2006 .

[9]  Justus Wesseler Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops , 2005 .

[10]  Leonard P. Gianessi,et al.  Herbicide tolerant soybeans: why growers are adopting Roundup Ready varieties , 1999 .

[11]  Harvey E. Lapan,et al.  Roundup ready® soybeans and welfare effects in the soybean complex , 2000 .

[12]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[13]  Robert D. Weaver,et al.  Monopolistic pricing power for transgenic crops when technology adopters face irreversible benefits and costs , 2004 .

[14]  Nathan Reigner,et al.  Plant Biotechnology: Potential Impact for Improving Pest Management in European Agriculture Wheat – Herbicide-Tolerant Case Study December 2003 , 2003 .

[15]  Harry A. Kuiper,et al.  Risks of the release of transgenic herbicide-resistant plants with respect to humans, animals, and the environment. , 2000 .

[16]  Justus Wesseler,et al.  The Maximum Incremental Social Tolerable Irreversible Costs (MISTICs) and other benefits and costs of introducing transgenic maize in the EU-15 , 2007 .

[17]  R. K. Peterson,et al.  Genetically Engineered Plants, Endangered Species, and Risk: A Temporal and Spatial Exposure Assessment for Karner Blue Butterfly Larvae and Bt Maize Pollen , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  S. Krimsky Agricultural biotechnology and the environment , 1993 .

[19]  Justus Wesseler,et al.  SPATIAL DIMENSION OF EXTERNALITIES AND THE COASE THEOREM: IMPLICATIONS FOR CO-EXISTENCE OF TRANSGENIC CROPS , 2005 .

[20]  J. Morison,et al.  An assessment of the total external costs of UK agriculture , 2000 .

[21]  S. Caul,et al.  Agricultural studies of GM maize and the field experimental infrastructure of ECOGEN , 2007 .

[22]  Robert S. Pindyck,et al.  Irreversibilities and the Timing of Environmental Policy , 2000 .

[23]  Paul M. Patterson,et al.  Hysteresis and the Shortage of Agricultural Labor , 1998 .

[24]  Nicholas G. Kalaitzandonakes A farm level perspective on agrobiotechnology: how much value and for whom? , 1999 .

[25]  Jim Leitzel,et al.  Investing in Policy Reform , 1999 .

[26]  Uwe Latacz-Lohmann,et al.  Forecasting the Adoption of GM Oilseed Rape: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment , 2008 .

[27]  P. Pingali,et al.  Pesticides, Productivity, and Farmer Health: A Philippine Case Study , 1994 .

[28]  Eric Tollens,et al.  First impact of biotechnology in the EU: Bt maize adoption in Spain , 2004 .

[29]  Eric Tollens,et al.  Regulating coexistence in Europe: Beware of the domino-effect! , 2008 .

[30]  H. Kendall Bioengineering of Crops , 2000 .

[31]  Justus Wesseler,et al.  Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and the Adoption of Transgenic Crops: Experiences from Applications to HT Sugar Beets, HT Corn, and Bt Corn , 2006 .

[32]  J. Wesseler,et al.  Irreversible costs and benefits of transgenic crops: what are they? , 2005 .

[33]  J. Fernandez-Cornejo,et al.  FARM-LEVEL EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GENETICALLY ENGINEERED CROPS IN THE U.S.A , 2000 .

[34]  J. Fernandez-Cornejo,et al.  Farm-level production effects related to the adoption of genetically modified cotton for pest management , 1999 .

[35]  Timothy J. Richards,et al.  Economic Hysteresis in Variety Selection , 2003, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[36]  Bernhard Streit,et al.  Definition and feasibility of isolation distances for transgenic maize cultivation , 2008, Transgenic Research.

[37]  Justus Wesseler,et al.  Coexistence Rules and Regulations in the European Union , 2006 .

[38]  International Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology Research (ICABR) , 2005 .

[39]  Olivier Sanvido,et al.  Coexistence in the EU—return of the moratorium on GM crops? , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[40]  Greg Traxler,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF BENEFITS FROM THE INTRODUCTION OF TRANSGENIC COTTON VARIETIES , 1999 .

[41]  A. Winter-Nelson,et al.  Option Values to Conservation and Agricultural Price Policy: Application to Terrace Construction in Kenya , 1998 .

[42]  Nikolaos Georgiopoulos Real Options , 2006 .

[43]  Murray Fulton,et al.  THE PRODUCER BENEFITS OF HERBICIDE-RESISTANT CANOLA , 1999 .

[44]  J. Wesseler,et al.  Governing the Co-Existence of GM Crops: Ex-Ante Regulation and Ex-Post Liability Under Uncertainty and Irreversibility , 2006 .

[45]  D. Reheul,et al.  Feasibility of isolation perimeters for genetically modified maize , 2008, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[46]  Clive James,et al.  Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2006. , 2006 .