The Propagation of Technology Management Taxonomies for Evaluating Investments in Information Systems

The management of Information Technology (IT) and Information Systems (IS) is considered a complex exercise by academics and practitioners alike. The reason for this is that there are ubiquitous portfolios of tangible and intangible benefits that are offered to an organization following the adoption of IT/IS that, in turn, all need managing to ensure realization. Organizations also have to take into account the direct and often larger indirect costs that are typically associated with IT/IS deployments. To provide managers with a critical insight into the management of new technology, this paper uses a case study research strategy to examine the technology management experiences of a leading U.K. manufacturing organization during its adoption of a vendor-supplied Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRPII) information system. Following the lack of attention given to human and organizational technology management factors while implementing MRPII, the vendor-based information system was later abandoned and deemed a failure. In addressing those technology management factors that were later identified as important, it was found that key employees were able to overcome a number of organizational barriers and develop and implement a bespoke MRPII system that significantly improved the organization's competitive position. Technology management taxonomies that contributed to the failure and later successful implementation of MRPII are identified and discussed. The organization's experiences in solving the problems associated with the implementation of their IS offers a learning opportunity for those companies that are seeking a competitive advantage through technology management.

[1]  D. Remenyi,et al.  Effective Measurement and Management of It Costs and Benefits: Key Issues , 1995 .

[2]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Investment Evaluation of New Technology: Integrating IT/IS Cost Management into Model , 2000 .

[3]  Zahir Irani,et al.  IT Evaluation Methods: Drivers and Consequences , 2000 .

[4]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Managing Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 1986 .

[5]  Edward E. Jones Field research: A manual for logistics and management of scientific studies in natural settings. , 1979 .

[6]  Peter Wheeler,et al.  Communication and Information Systems. , 1982 .

[7]  Tom Renkema Boekbespreking Farbey, B.; Land, F.; Targett, D.: how to assess your IT investment, a study of methods and practice (Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 1993) , 1994 .

[8]  Z. Irani,et al.  Assessing the value and cost implications of manufacturing information and data systems: an empirical study , 1998 .

[9]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[10]  Z. Irani,et al.  Integrating the costs of a manufacturing IT/IS infrastructure into the investment decision-making process , 1997 .

[11]  Catherine Hakim,et al.  Research Design: Strategies and Choices in the Design of Social Research , 1987 .

[12]  Andy Hyde,et al.  Failure? Who says? , 2000 .

[13]  Sherry D. Ryan,et al.  Considering Social Subsystem Costs and Benefits in Information Technology Investment Decisions: A View from the Field on Anticipated Payoffs , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Mustafa O. Attir,et al.  Field Research: A Manual for Logistics and Management of Scientific Studies in Natural Settings. , 1979 .

[15]  James F. Cox,et al.  Problems in Implementing and Operating a Manufacturing Resource Planning Information System , 1984, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Steve Smithson,et al.  Information systems evaluation in practice: a case study of organizational change , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[17]  T. Bonoma Case Research in Marketing: Opportunities, Problems, and a Process , 1985 .