Monitoring Cortical Excitability during Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Children with ADHD: A Single-Blind, Sham-Controlled TMS-EEG Study

Background Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) allows non-invasive stimulation of the human brain. However, no suitable marker has yet been established to monitor the immediate rTMS effects on cortical areas in children. Objective TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) could present a well-suited marker for real-time monitoring. Monitoring is particularly important in children where only few data about rTMS effects and safety are currently available. Methods In a single-blind sham-controlled study, twenty-five school-aged children with ADHD received subthreshold 1 Hz-rTMS to the primary motor cortex. The TMS-evoked N100 was measured by 64-channel-EEG pre, during and post rTMS, and compared to sham stimulation as an intraindividual control condition. Results TMS-evoked N100 amplitude decreased during 1 Hz-rTMS and, at the group level, reached a stable plateau after approximately 500 pulses. N100 amplitude to supra-threshold single pulses post rTMS confirmed the amplitude reduction in comparison to the pre-rTMS level while sham stimulation had no influence. EEG source analysis indicated that the TMS-evoked N100 change reflected rTMS effects in the stimulated motor cortex. Amplitude changes in TMS-evoked N100 and MEPs (pre versus post 1 Hz-rTMS) correlated significantly, but this correlation was also found for pre versus post sham stimulation. Conclusion The TMS-evoked N100 represents a promising candidate marker to monitor rTMS effects on cortical excitability in children with ADHD. TMS-evoked N100 can be employed to monitor real-time effects of TMS for subthreshold intensities. Though TMS-evoked N100 was a more sensitive parameter for rTMS-specific changes than MEPs in our sample, further studies are necessary to demonstrate whether clinical rTMS effects can be predicted from rTMS-induced changes in TMS-evoked N100 amplitude and to clarify the relationship between rTMS-induced changes in TMS-evoked N100 and MEP amplitudes. The TMS-evoked N100 amplitude reduction after 1 Hz-rTMS could either reflect a globally decreased cortical response to the TMS pulse or a specific decrease in inhibition.

[1]  Hans L. Hamburger,et al.  Global Field Power measurement versus classical method in the determination of the latency of evoked potential components , 2005, Brain Topography.

[2]  M. Ansseau,et al.  Impact of low frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on event-related brain potentials , 2004, Biological Psychology.

[3]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC , 1997, Conference Record of the Thirty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.97CB36136).

[5]  E. Merrin,et al.  The Wisconsin Card Sort Test and P300 responses to novel auditory stimuli in schizophrenic patients. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[6]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  C. Marsden,et al.  Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  M. Massimini,et al.  Natural Frequencies of Human Corticothalamic Circuits , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  S. Mostofsky,et al.  Motor cortex inhibition , 2011, Neurology.

[10]  R. J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation produces intensity-dependent EEG responses in humans , 2005, NeuroImage.

[11]  Risto J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Methodology for Combined TMS and EEG , 2009, Brain Topography.

[12]  Stephan Bender,et al.  Frontal lobe involvement in the processing of meaningful auditory stimuli develops during childhood and adolescence , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  J Zhang,et al.  Should transcranial magnetic stimulation research in children be considered minimal risk? , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Preconditioning of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence for Homeostatic Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Modulation of electroencephalographic responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation: evidence for changes in cortical excitability related to movement , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[16]  R. Benecke,et al.  Restoration of Disturbed Intracortical Motor Inhibition and Facilitation in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Children by Methylphenidate , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[17]  H. Niederhofer.  Effectiveness of the repetitive Transcranical Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) of 1 Hz for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). , 2008, Psychiatria Danubina.

[18]  Seppo Kähkönen,et al.  Effects of alcohol on TMS-evoked N100 responses , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  C. Freitag,et al.  Impaired cortical inhibition in adult ADHD patients: a study with transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2007, Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum.

[20]  S. Rossi,et al.  Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on movement-related cortical activity in humans. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  H. Heinrich,et al.  Children with comorbid attention‐deficit‐hyperactivity disorder and tic disorder: Evidence for additive inhibitory deficits within the motor system , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[22]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The effect of continuous theta burst stimulation over premotor cortex on circuits in primary motor cortex and spinal cord , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  Thomas Kammer,et al.  Electroencephalographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation in children: Evidence for giant inhibitory potentials , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[24]  J J Bartko,et al.  Subjective Reactions of Children to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2001, Journal of child neurology.

[25]  C. Pecoraro,et al.  Modulatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS over the cerebellum on motor cortex excitability , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Risto J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Projecting out muscle artifacts from TMS-evoked EEG , 2011, NeuroImage.

[27]  Paul B. Fitzgerald,et al.  GABA and cortical inhibition in motor and non-motor regions using combined TMS–EEG: A time analysis , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  M. Bonnard,et al.  Prior intention can locally tune inhibitory processes in the primary motor cortex: direct evidence from combined TMS‐EEG , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[30]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Interaction between intracortical inhibition and facilitation in human motor cortex. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Paired MEG data set source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC , 1998 .

[32]  David Becker,et al.  Cortical motor areas are activated early in a characteristic sequence during post-movement processing , 2006, NeuroImage.

[33]  Humberto Quintana,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Persons Younger Than the Age of 18 , 2005, The journal of ECT.

[34]  Emanuele Lo Gerfo,et al.  Changes in intracortical circuits of the human motor cortex following theta burst stimulation of the lateral cerebellum , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  H. Heinrich,et al.  [Transcranial magnetic stimulation in child and adolescent psychiatry: excitability of the motor system in tic disorders and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorders]. , 2001, Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie.

[36]  Wolfgang Skrandies,et al.  Data reduction of multichannel fields: Global field power and Principal Component Analysis , 2005, Brain Topography.

[37]  Synnöve Carlson,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of short-latency afferent inhibition: a combined EEG and TMS study , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  N. Rinehart,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves movement-related cortical potentials in autism spectrum disorders , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[39]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The neural signature of phosphene perception , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[40]  R. J. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Bilateral changes in excitability of sensorimotor cortices during unilateral movement: Combined electroencephalographic and transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2008, Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Bonnard,et al.  Cortical mechanisms underlying stretch reflex adaptation to intention: A combined EEG–TMS study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[42]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[43]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Homeostatic effects of plasma valproate levels on corticospinal excitability changes induced by 1Hz rTMS in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[45]  Aribert Rothenberger,et al.  Cortical inhibition in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: new insights from the electroencephalographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  H. Heinrich,et al.  Deficient intracortical inhibition in drug-naive children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder is enhanced by methylphenidate , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[47]  Seppo Kähkönen,et al.  The effect of stimulus intensity on brain responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[48]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  Potentiation of short-latency cortical responses by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Comparison of the Inhibitory and Excitatory Effects of ADHD Medications Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Motor Cortex , 2006, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[50]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Consensus: Motor cortex plasticity protocols , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[51]  Y. Levkovitz,et al.  Positive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on attention in ADHD Subjects: A randomized controlled pilot study , 2010, The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry.

[52]  E. Wassermann.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.