Implementation of integrated information systems: a comparison of field studies with IS literatures

Integrated information systems (IISs) enable electronic access to design and engineering data throughout a system's life cycle, but companies have been slow to develop the systems. A field study in 1992 of five organizations that were judged to be successful in implementing IISs examined the management perspective on the goals, motives, and factors critical to successful implementation. The results are compared with the results of a similar study in 1984 and with the MIS implementation and strategic IS (SIS) literatures. The comparison suggests that managers' views have shifted and neither the MIS implementation nor the SIS research paradigm adequately encompasses the findings. The paper concludes with suggestions for MIS implementation research to enlarge the boundaries of the systems being studied and for SIS research to explicitly state the underlying assumptions and models.<<ETX>>

[1]  Randall L. Schultz,et al.  A Structural Model of Implementation , 1983 .

[2]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Revisiting DSS Implementation Research: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature and Suggestions for Researchers , 1992, MIS Q..

[3]  Robert M. Mason,et al.  The Role of Metaphors in Strategic Information Systems Planning , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[5]  Harold G. Levine,et al.  Understanding barriers to IT implementation: a case study of 'rationality,' human error, and undiscussable issues , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Linda Duxbury The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation , 1993 .

[7]  Ananth Srinivasan,et al.  Alternative Measures of Systems Effectiveness: Associations and Implications , 1985, MIS Q..

[8]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions , 1981 .

[9]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  The measurement of learning from executive information systems , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Creating competitive weapons from information systems. , 1984, The Journal of business strategy.

[11]  Blake Ives,et al.  Information Technology and Corporate Strategy: A View from the Top , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  C. Argyris Double Loop Learning in Organizations , 1996 .

[13]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[14]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing the Success of Customer-Oriented Strategic Systems , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Gustavo Stubrich The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[16]  K. Gergen Toward Generative Theory , 1978 .

[17]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  The Impact of Data Integration on the Costs and Benefits of Information Systems , 1992, MIS Q..

[18]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Of strategies, deliberate and emergent , 1985, Strategic Management Journal.

[19]  Robert M. Mason,et al.  Strategic information systems: use of information technology in a learning organization , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Competition and cooperation in information systems innovation , 1988, Inf. Manag..

[21]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.